Literature DB >> 31040511

Promoting Professional Behaviours in Physical Therapy Students Using Standardized Patient Feedback.

Mary Anne Riopel1, Bini Litwin2, Nicki Silberman3, Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Physical therapy (PT) students receive feedback on their professional behaviours from academic and clinical faculty. Another avenue for providing feedback to PT students is by using standardized patients (SPs). Very little research is available on the impact of SPs' specific feedback on whether, and how, PT students learn professional behaviour, and what research is available has focused on clinical competencies, communities of practice, and broad assessments of professional behaviours. The purpose of this study was to record PT students' perspectives on how combined verbal and written SP feedback affected their professional behaviours. Method: The sample of convenience consisted of seven students enrolled in a PT professional education programme in the northeastern United States before starting their first full-time clinical experience. The students agreed to participate in an SP experience focused on professional behaviours. This study used a phenomenological approach to understand the students' perspectives on receiving a combination of verbal and written SP feedback.
Results: The students' perspectives on receiving SP feedback were categorized into four themes: seeing through the patient's eyes; SPs offer unique contributions to student learning; timely, verbal feedback adds a deeper understanding of professional behaviours in preparation for the clinic; and verbal feedback promotes student self-efficacy of professional behaviours. Conclusions: Using SPs' written and verbal feedback in the curriculum can be a valuable tool for enhancing the development of PT students' professional behaviour.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allied health occupations; education; professionalism; simulation training

Year:  2019        PMID: 31040511      PMCID: PMC6484960          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2018-04.e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  18 in total

Review 1.  Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings.

Authors:  William T Branch; Anuradha Paranjape
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  How clinical instructors can enhance the learning experience of physical therapy students in an introductory clinical placement.

Authors:  Beverley Cole; Jean Wessel
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.853

3.  Teaching professionalism: a survey of physical therapy educators.

Authors:  D Scott Davis
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2009

4.  Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians.

Authors:  Christopher Watling; Erik Driessen; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Dimensions of feedback in clinical teaching: a descriptive study.

Authors:  A W Frye; M A Hollingsworth; A Wymer; M A Hinds
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Simulation can contribute a part of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy clinical education: two randomized trials.

Authors:  Felicity C Blackstock; Kathryn M Watson; Norman R Morris; Anne Jones; Anthony Wright; Joan M McMeeken; Darren A Rivett; Vivienne O'Connor; Raymond F Peterson; Terry P Haines; Geoffrey Watson; Gwendolen Anne Jull
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.929

7.  Profiling physiotherapy student preferred learning styles within a clinical education context.

Authors:  Steve Milanese; Susan Gordon; Aya Pellatt
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 8.  Simulated Patients in Physical Therapy Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shane A Pritchard; Felicity C Blackstock; Debra Nestel; Jenny L Keating
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2016-03-03

9.  Assessing students' communication and interpersonal skills across evaluation settings.

Authors:  Alexander W Chessman; Amy V Blue; Gregory E Gilbert; Maura Carey; Arch G Mainous
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students?

Authors:  Renée E Stalmeijer; Diana H J M Dolmans; Ineke H A P Wolfhagen; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.