Literature DB >> 31037245

Boundary determination of foot ulcer images by applying the associative hierarchical random field framework.

Lei Wang1, Peder C Pedersen1, Emmanuel Agu2, Diane Strong3, Bengisu Tulu3.   

Abstract

As traditional visual-examination-based methods provide neither reliable nor consistent wound assessment, several computer-based approaches for quantitative wound image analysis have been proposed in recent years. However, these methods require either some level of human interaction for proper image processing or that images be captured under controlled conditions. However, to become a practical tool of diabetic patients for wound management, the wound image algorithm needs to be able to correctly locate and detect the wound boundary of images acquired under less-constrained conditions, where the illumination and camera angle can vary within reasonable bounds. We present a wound boundary determination method that is robust to lighting and camera orientation perturbations by applying the associative hierarchical random field (AHRF) framework, which is an improved conditional random field (CRF) model originally applied to natural image multiscale analysis. To validate the robustness of the AHRF framework for wound boundary recognition tasks, we have tested the method on two image datasets: (1) foot and leg ulcer images (for the patients we have tracked for 2 years) that were captured under one of the two conditions, such that 70% of the entire dataset are captured with image capture box to ensure consistent lighting and range and the remaining 30% of the images are captured by a handheld camera under varied conditions of lighting, incident angle, and range and (2) moulage wound images that were captured under similarly varied conditions. Compared to other CRF-based machine learning strategies, our new method provides a determination accuracy with the best global performance rates (specificity: > 95 % and sensitivity: > 77 % .

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditional random field; diabetic foot ulcer; wound boundary determination; wound image analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31037245      PMCID: PMC6475526          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.024002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  9 in total

1.  An active contour model for measuring the area of leg ulcers.

Authors:  T D Jones; P Plassmann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

3.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods.

Authors:  Radhakrishna Achanta; Appu Shaji; Kevin Smith; Aurelien Lucchi; Pascal Fua; Sabine Süsstrunk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Enhanced assessment of the wound-healing process by accurate multiview tissue classification.

Authors:  Hazem Wannous; Yves Lucas; Sylvie Treuillet
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Associative Hierarchical Random Fields.

Authors:  L'ubor Ladický; Chris Russell; Pushmeet Kohli; Philip H S Torr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Area Determination of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Images Using a Cascaded Two-Stage SVM-Based Classification.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Peder C Pedersen; Emmanuel Agu; Diane M Strong; Bengisu Tulu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Binary tissue classification on wound images with neural networks and bayesian classifiers.

Authors:  Francisco Veredas; Héctor Mesa; Laura Morente
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Smartphone-based wound assessment system for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Peder C Pedersen; Diane M Strong; Bengisu Tulu; Emmanuel Agu; Ronald Ignotz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.538

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Wound assessment, imaging and monitoring systems in diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kai Siang Chan; Zhiwen Joseph Lo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Comprehensive Assessment of Fine-Grained Wound Images Using a Patch-Based CNN With Context-Preserving Attention.

Authors:  Ziyang Liu; Emmanuel Agu; Peder Pedersen; Clifford Lindsay; Bengisu Tulu; Diane Strong
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.