Literature DB >> 19825516

Binary tissue classification on wound images with neural networks and bayesian classifiers.

Francisco Veredas1, Héctor Mesa, Laura Morente.   

Abstract

A pressure ulcer is a clinical pathology of localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by pressure, shear, or friction. Diagnosis, treatment, and care of pressure ulcers are costly for health services. Accurate wound evaluation is a critical task for optimizing the efficacy of treatment and care. Clinicians usually evaluate each pressure ulcer by visual inspection of the damaged tissues, which is an imprecise manner of assessing the wound state. Current computer vision approaches do not offer a global solution to this particular problem. In this paper, a hybrid approach based on neural networks and Bayesian classifiers is used in the design of a computational system for automatic tissue identification in wound images. A mean shift procedure and a region-growing strategy are implemented for effective region segmentation. Color and texture features are extracted from these segmented regions. A set of k multilayer perceptrons is trained with inputs consisting of color and texture patterns, and outputs consisting of categorical tissue classes which are determined by clinical experts. This training procedure is driven by a k-fold cross-validation method. Finally, a Bayesian committee machine is formed by training a Bayesian classifier to combine the classifications of the k neural networks. Specific heuristics based on the wound topology are designed to significantly improve the results of the classification. We obtain high efficiency rates from a binary cascade approach for tissue identification. Results are compared with other similar machine-learning approaches, including multiclass Bayesian committee machine classifiers and support vector machines. The different techniques analyzed in this paper show high global classification accuracy rates. Our binary cascade approach gives high global performance rates (average sensitivity =78.7% , specificity =94.7% , and accuracy =91.5% ) and shows the highest average sensitivity score ( =86.3%) when detecting necrotic tissue in the wound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19825516     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2033595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  15 in total

1.  Efficient detection of wound-bed and peripheral skin with statistical colour models.

Authors:  Francisco J Veredas; Héctor Mesa; Laura Morente
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Non-Invasive Multimodal Imaging in Chronic Wound Monitoring: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rashmi Mukherjee; Suman Tewary; Aurobinda Routray
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Classification of pressure ulcer tissues with 3D convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Begoña García-Zapirain; Mohammed Elmogy; Ayman El-Baz; Adel S Elmaghraby
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Boundary determination of foot ulcer images by applying the associative hierarchical random field framework.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Peder C Pedersen; Emmanuel Agu; Diane Strong; Bengisu Tulu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-04-21

5.  An Automatic Assessment System of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Wound Area Determination, Color Segmentation, and Healing Score Evaluation.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Peder C Pedersen; Diane M Strong; Bengisu Tulu; Emmanuel Agu; Ron Ignotz; Qian He
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-07

6.  Diabetic Foot Surveillance Using Mobile Phones and Automated Software Messaging, a Randomized Observational Trial.

Authors:  Chris A Anthony; John E Femino; Aaron C Miller; Linnea A Polgreen; Edward O Rojas; Shelby L Francis; Alberto M Segre; Philip M Polgreen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

7.  Wound Size Imaging: Ready for Smart Assessment and Monitoring.

Authors:  Yves Lucas; Rania Niri; Sylvie Treuillet; Hassan Douzi; Benjamin Castaneda
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A Composite Model of Wound Segmentation Based on Traditional Methods and Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Fangzhao Li; Changjian Wang; Xiaohui Liu; Yuxing Peng; Shiyao Jin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-31

9.  Chronic wound assessment and infection detection method.

Authors:  Jui-Tse Hsu; Yung-Wei Chen; Te-Wei Ho; Hao-Chih Tai; Jin-Ming Wu; Hsin-Yun Sun; Chi-Sheng Hung; Yi-Chong Zeng; Sy-Yen Kuo; Feipei Lai
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  A novel expert system for objective masticatory efficiency assessment.

Authors:  Gustavo Vaccaro; José Ignacio Peláez; José Antonio Gil-Montoya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.