Literature DB >> 32195493

Impact of electronic polarizability on protein-functional group interactions.

Himanshu Goel1, Wenbo Yu1, Vincent D Ustach1, Asaminew H Aytenfisu1, Delin Sun1, Alexander D MacKerell1.   

Abstract

Interactions of proteins with functional groups are key to their biological functions, making it essential that they be accurately modeled. To investigate the impact of the inclusion of explicit treatment of electronic polarizability in force fields on protein-functional group interactions, the additive CHARMM and Drude polarizable force field are compared in the context of the Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulation methodology from which functional group interaction patterns with five proteins for which experimental binding affinities of multiple ligands are available, were obtained. The explicit treatment of polarizability produces significant differences in the functional group interactions in the ligand binding sites including overall enhanced binding of functional groups to the proteins. This is associated with variations of the dipole moments of solutes representative of functional groups in the binding sites relative to aqueous solution with higher dipole moments systematically occurring in the latter, though exceptions occur with positively charged methylammonium. Such variation indicates the complex, heterogeneous nature of the electronic environments of ligand binding sites and emphasizes the inherent limitation of fixed charged, additive force fields for modeling ligand-protein interactions. These effects yield more defined orientation of the functional groups in the binding pockets and a small, but systematic improvement in the ability of the SILCS method to predict the binding orientation and relative affinities of ligands to their target proteins. Overall, these results indicate that the physical model associated with the explicit treatment of polarizability along with the presence of lone pairs in a force field leads to changes in the nature of the interactions of functional groups with proteins versus that occurring with additive force fields, suggesting the utility of polarizable force fields in obtaining a more realistic understanding of protein-ligand interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32195493      PMCID: PMC7194236          DOI: 10.1039/d0cp00088d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys        ISSN: 1463-9076            Impact factor:   3.676


  83 in total

1.  GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free.

Authors:  David Van Der Spoel; Erik Lindahl; Berk Hess; Gerrit Groenhof; Alan E Mark; Herman J C Berendsen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 2.  Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Drude polarizable force field for aliphatic ketones and aldehydes, and their associated acyclic carbohydrates.

Authors:  Meagan C Small; Asaminew H Aytenfisu; Fang-Yu Lin; Xibing He; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential.

Authors:  Dian Jiao; Pavel A Golubkov; Thomas A Darden; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ranking Reversible Covalent Drugs: From Free Energy Perturbation to Fragment Docking.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Wenjuan Jiang; Payal Chatterjee; Yun Luo
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations.

Authors:  E Prabhu Raman; Wenbo Yu; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Molecular dynamics simulations using the drude polarizable force field on GPUs with OpenMM: Implementation, validation, and benchmarks.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Justin A Lemkul; Peter K Eastman; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  OpenMM 4: A Reusable, Extensible, Hardware Independent Library for High Performance Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Peter Eastman; Mark S Friedrichs; John D Chodera; Randall J Radmer; Christopher M Bruns; Joy P Ku; Kyle A Beauchamp; Thomas J Lane; Lee-Ping Wang; Diwakar Shukla; Tony Tye; Mike Houston; Timo Stich; Christoph Klein; Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Representation of Ion-Protein Interactions Using the Drude Polarizable Force-Field.

Authors:  Hui Li; Van Ngo; Mauricio Chagas Da Silva; Dennis R Salahub; Karen Callahan; Benoît Roux; Sergei Yu Noskov
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Polarizable Force Fields for Macromolecules: Microsecond Simulations of Proteins Using the Classical Drude Oscillator Model.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Pedro E M Lopes; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.

Authors:  Xibing He; Viet H Man; Wei Yang; Tai-Sung Lee; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Application of Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation in Computer-Aided Drug Design.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Wenbo Yu; Sunhwan Jo; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  New J Chem       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.591

3.  Rapid and accurate estimation of protein-ligand relative binding affinities using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Vincent D Ustach; Sunhwan Jo; Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 9.825

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.