Literature DB >> 11274894

Progress in predicting human ADME parameters in silico.

S Ekins1, C L Waller, P W Swaan, G Cruciani, S A Wrighton, J H Wikel.   

Abstract

Understanding the development of a scientific approach is a valuable exercise in gauging the potential directions the process could take in the future. The relatively short history of applying computational methods to absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) can be split into defined periods. The first began in the 1960s and continued through the 1970s with the work of Corwin Hansch et al. Their models utilized small sets of in vivo ADME data. The second era from the 1980s through 1990s witnessed the widespread incorporation of in vitro approaches as surrogates of in vivo ADME studies. These approaches fostered the initiation and increase in interpretable computational ADME models available in the literature. The third era is the present were there are many literature data sets derived from in vitro data for absorption, drug-drug interactions (DDI), drug transporters and efflux pumps [P-glycoprotein (P-gp), MRP], intrinsic clearance and brain penetration, which can theoretically be used to predict the situation in vivo in humans. Combinatorial synthesis, high throughput screening and computational approaches have emerged as a result of continual pressure on pharmaceutical companies to accelerate drug discovery while decreasing drug development costs. The goal has become to reduce the drop-out rate of drug candidates in the latter, most expensive stages of drug development. This is accomplished by increasing the failure rate of candidate compounds in the preclinical stages and increasing the speed of nomination of likely clinical candidates. The industry now understands the reasons for clinical failure other than efficacy are mainly related to pharmacokinetics and toxicity. The late 1990s saw significant company investment in ADME and drug safety departments to assess properties such as metabolic stability, cytochrome P-450 inhibition, absorption and genotoxicity earlier in the drug discovery paradigm. The next logical step in this process is the evaluation of higher throughput data to determine if computational (in silico) models can be constructed and validated from it. Such models would allow an exponential increase in the number of compounds screened virtually for ADME parameters. A number of researchers have started to utilize in silico, in vitro and in vivo approaches in parallel to address intestinal permeability and cytochrome P-450-mediated DDI. This review will assess how computational approaches for ADME parameters have evolved and how they are likely to progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11274894     DOI: 10.1016/s1056-8719(00)00109-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  42 in total

Review 1.  A ligand-based approach to understanding selectivity of nuclear hormone receptors PXR, CAR, FXR, LXRalpha, and LXRbeta.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Leonid Mirny; Erin G Schuetz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Chemical space: missing pieces in cheminformatics.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Rishi R Gupta; Eric Gifford; Barry A Bunin; Chris L Waller
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Comparative QSAR studies on PAMPA/modified PAMPA for high throughput profiling of drug absorption potential with respect to Caco-2 cells and human intestinal absorption.

Authors:  Rajeshwar P Verma; Corwin Hansch; Cynthia D Selassie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  An atomistic model of passive membrane permeability: application to a series of FDA approved drugs.

Authors:  Chakrapani Kalyanaraman; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Evaluation of descriptors and classification schemes to predict cytochrome substrates in terms of chemical information.

Authors:  John H Block; Douglas R Henry
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  New predictive models for blood-brain barrier permeability of drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Dmitriy Chekmarev; William J Welsh; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Computational models to assign biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification from molecular structure.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Praveen M Bahadduri; Cheng Chang; James E Polli; Peter W Swaan; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  In vitro inhibitory profile of NDGA against AChE and its in silico structural modifications based on ADME profile.

Authors:  Chandran Remya; Kalarickal Vijayan Dileep; Ignatius Tintu; Elessery Jayadevi Variyar; Chittalakkottu Sadasivan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 10.  Back to the future: can physical models of passive membrane permeability help reduce drug candidate attrition and move us beyond QSPR?

Authors:  Robert V Swift; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.