Literature DB >> 24639193

Gastric stump cancer after distal gastrectomy for benign disease: clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes.

Alberto Di Leo1, Corrado Pedrazzani, Maria Bencivenga, Arianna Coniglio, Fausto Rosa, Paolo Morgani, Daniele Marrelli, Alberto Marchet, Luca Cozzaglio, Simone Giacopuzzi, Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio, Giovanni Battista Doglietto, Giovanni Vittimberga, Franco Roviello, Francesco Ricci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to analyze clinicopathologic features and long-term prognosis of gastric stump cancer (GSC) arising in the remnant stomach 5 years or later after partial gastrectomy for benign disease.
METHODS: We reviewed the results of 176 patients resected with curative intent for GSC at 8 Italian centers belonging to the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG). The median (range) follow-up time for surviving patients was 71.2 (6-207) months.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-six patients were men, the mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69.2 years, and the great majority (167 cases) underwent Billroth II reconstruction. R0 resection was achieved in 158 (90 %) patients, and in 94 (53 %) lymph node dissection was ≥D2. Postoperative mortality and complication rates were 6.2 and 43.2 %, respectively. T1 tumor was diagnosed in 45 (25 %) cases. Lymph node metastases were evident in 86 patients (49 %). Thirteen patients had involvement of the jejunal mesentery nodes (pJN+); five cases were T2-T3 and eight cases were T4. Overall 5-year survival rate was 53.1 %. Five-year survival rates were 68.1, 37.8, and 33.1 % for pT1, pT2-3, and pT4 tumors, respectively (P = 0.001). Five-year survival rate was 56.5 % for node-negative tumors (pN0), 32.3 % for tumors with nodal metastases without involvement of jejunal mesentery nodes (pN+), and 17.1 % for tumors with involvement of jejunal mesentery nodes (pJN+) (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an aggressive surgical approach can achieve a satisfactory outcome in GSC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24639193     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3633-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Effects of initial disease status on lymph flow following gastrectomy in cases of carcinoma in the remnant stomach.

Authors:  Shinsaku Honda; Etsuro Bando; Rie Makuuchi; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Taiichi Kawamura; Teiichi Sugiura; Yusuke Kinugasa; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Clinicopathologic features of remnant gastric cancer over time following distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  De-Wei Zhang; Biao Dong; Zhen Li; Dong-Qiu Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Outcomes after completion total gastrectomy for gastric remnant cancer: experience from a Canadian tertiary centre.

Authors:  Etienne St-Louis; Stephen Donald Gowing; Pedram Mossallanejad; Mara Laura Leimanis; Carmen Mueller; Lorenzo Edwin Ferri
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  [Gastric stump carcinoma: frequency, treatment, complications and prognosis].

Authors:  H Nienhüser; S Blank; L Sisic; R Kunzmann; U Heger; K Ott; M W Büchler; T Schmidt; A Ulrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaichi Ohira; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Naoshi Kubo; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kazuya Muguruma; Masakazu Yashiro; Naoyoshi Onoda; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical resection of gastric remnant cancer: a clinical comparison.

Authors:  Guo-De Luo; Bao-Hua Chen; Yong-Kuan Cao; Jia-Qing Gong; Shan-Hong Tang; Yun-Ming Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 7.  Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Takeo Fukagawa; Yoshio Haga; Koji Oba
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Is there difference between anastomotic site and remnant stump carcinoma in gastric stump cancers?-a single institute analysis of 90 patients.

Authors:  Ramachandra Chowdappa; Ajeet Ramamani Tiwari; Namrata Ranganath; Rekha V Kumar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-04

9.  Prognostic value of tumor size in patients with remnant gastric cancer: is the seventh UICC stage sufficient for predicting prognosis?

Authors:  Jun Lu; Chang-ming Huang; Chao-hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-wei Xie; Jia-bin Wang; Jian-xian Lin; Qi-yue Chen; Long-long Cao; Mi Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastric stump: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Fu-Hai Ma; Li-Yan Xue; Ying-Tai Chen; Yi-Bin Xie; Yu-Xin Zhong; Quan Xu; Yan-Tao Tian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.