| Literature DB >> 31031717 |
Qiuxiang Tang1,2, Guiqiang He1,2, Jun Huang1, Chongde Wu1,2, Yao Jin1,2, Rongqing Zhou1,2,3.
Abstract
Xiaoqu is a fermentation starter used in the production of Xiaoqu jiu, which is also a traditional Chinese liquor. The quality and microbial community characteristics of Xiaoqu is closely related with the yield and flavor feature of fresh Xiaoqu jiu. The present study aims to explore the mystery behind microbial diversity and volatiles of Xiaoqu through polyphasic detection methods such as the Illumina MiSeq platform and the metabolite analyzing method. Results showed that differences in microbial community diversity among samples were significant. The hydrolytic ability was positively correlated with α- and β-diversity of bacteria, but negatively correlated with that of fungi. Staphylococcus and Weissella were the dominant bacteria, while Rhizopus and Candida were the dominant fungi. The abundance of bacteria in sample No3 ranged from 33.66 to 91.53%, while sample No4 the abundance of fungi ranged from 58.51 to 48.72%. The difference of microbial community diversity resulted in a discrepancy of volatile profiles and interaction relationship among the genus. Twenty-four dominant bacteria and seven dominant fungi were correlated with 20 different volatiles. This study provides a scientific perspective of the uniformity and stability of Xiaoqu jiu and might aid in controlling its manufacturing process.Entities:
Keywords: MiSeq high-throughput sequencing; Xiaoqu; correlation; fermentation characteristics; microbial diversity; volatiles
Year: 2019 PMID: 31031717 PMCID: PMC6473189 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1(A) Microbial community structure in each sample (bacteria). (B) Microbial community structure in each sample (fungi). Stacked bar graphs illustrate the abundance of genera.
FIGURE 2Heat map of genera level community composition in combination with cluster analysis. (A) Bacteria heat map. (B) Fungi heat map.
FIGURE 3Results of NMDS sequencing of Xiaoqu. No1, No2, No3, No4 are represented by red, green, sky blue, dark blue, respectively. The stress value of NMDS for microbial are all 0.0000.
Differences in physicochemical properties of four Xiaoqu samples.
| Sample | Moisture(%) | fermenting power(g/0.5 g ⋅ 72 h) | esterifying power (mg/50 g ⋅ 7 d) | saccharifying power (mg/g ⋅ h) | liquefying power (g/g ⋅ h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No1 | 4.67 ± 0.00 | 7.90 ± 0.22 | 1.95 ± 0.08 | 1771.50 ± 0.00 | 1.05 ± 0.08 |
| No2 | 6.18 ± 0.00 | 7.50 ± 0.35 | 54.01 ± 6.98 | 964.50 ± 22.63 | 0.56 ± 0.03 |
| No3 | 6.33 ± 0.00 | 7.80 ± 0.79 | 25.12 ± 12.67 | 274.88 ± 17.50 | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
| No4 | 7.61 ± 0.00 | 7.43 ± 0.55 | 123.56 ± 35.13 | 1071.38 ± 121.45 | 1.07 ± 0.10 |
FIGURE 4(A) Proportions of volatile substances in the sample. Bar graph (B), and Plot cladogram (C) results on the abundance of volatiles. Volatiles differentiality are represented by a linear discriminant analysis, coupled with effect size (LEfSe) (LDA > 2, P < 0.05). No1, No2, No3, No4 are represented by red, green, blue, purple, respectively. 1: hexanol 2: 2-heptenal 3: 3-methyl-1-pentanol 4: 1-octen-3-ol 5: 2,3-butanediol 6: benzenemethanol 7: benzeneethanol 8: trans-nerolidol 9: 3-octen-2-one 10: 3-nonen-2-one 11: 3,5-octadien-2-one 12: 6-dodecanone 13: 6,10-dimethyl-2-undecanone 14: cis-geranylacetone 15: 1-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-ethanone 16: 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-pentadecanone 17: dodecalactone 18: 5-ethyl-1-cyclopentene-1-carbaldehyde 19: 2-octen-1-al 20: 3-furaldehyde 21: decanal 22: benzaldehyde 23: 2-nonenal 24: 2-decenal 25: 2-butyl-2-octenal 26: 2,4-nonadienal 27: 2-undecenal 28: acetic acid 29: pentanoic acid 30: hexanoic acid 31: octanoic acid 32: sorbic acid 33: nonanoic acid 34: 2-pentylfuran 35: 2-methoxyphenol 36: phenol 37: 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol 38: dibenzofuran 39: 2,3-dihydro-benzofuran 40: methyl hexanoate 41: methyl 4-hexanoate 42: methyl heptanoate 43: methyl nonanoate 44: octyl formate 45: methyl decanoate 46: methyl benzate 47: methyl dodecanoate 48: methyl tridecanoate 49: methyl 8-oxooctanoate 50: methyl isomyristate 51: methyl tetradecanoate 52: methyl Z-11-tetradecenoate 53: nonanoic acid, 9-oxo-, methyl ester 54: methyl pentadecanoate 55: nonanedioic acid, dimethyl ester 56: methyl hexadecanoate 57: methyl palmitoleate 58: 7,10-hexadecadienoic acid, methyl ester 59: methyl heptadecanoate 60: methyl octadecanoate 61: elaidic acid, methyl ester 62: linoleic acid, methyl ester 63: 6,9,12-octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester 64: linolenic acid, methyl ester 65: tetradecane 66: caryophyllene 67: heptadecane 68: naphthalene 69: 2-methylnaphthalene 70: 1,7-dimethylnaphthalene 71: 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1,1-biphenyl 72: 1-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-benzene.
FIGURE 5RDA of dominant genera (OTU > 1%) and dominant volatiles (The volatiles were consistent with Figure 4): (A) Correlation between volatiles and bacteria genera. (B) Correlation between volatiles and fungi genera.
FIGURE 6(A) Association network diagram of dominant genera. (B) Metabolic map of dominant genera in Xiaoqu.