| Literature DB >> 35966713 |
Xiaoge Hou1, Ming Hui1, Zhongke Sun1, Xuesi Li2, Xin Shi1, Ran Xiao1, Junfei Wang3, Chunmei Pan2, Ruifang Li1,4.
Abstract
Medium-temperature Daqu (MT-Daqu), a saccharification-fermentation agent and aroma-producing agent, is used to produce Chinese strong-flavor Baijiu. Many related studies have been published; however, less is known about microbial community and quality properties inside and outside the MT-Daqu from fermentation to storage. Here, along with determining the physicochemical index, the microbial community of MT-Daqu was investigated using both culture-dependent and culture-independent methods during 31 days of fermentation and 4 months of storage. Volatile compounds of mature MT-Daqu were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results indicated obvious variation in the microbial community due to the changes in environmental conditions, and the physicochemical indices shifted from fluctuations in the fermentation period to relative stability after storage for 3 months. Moreover, the microbial counts and physicochemical indices of the inner layers of MT-Daqu differed from those of the outer layers. The dominant communities, including the bacterial phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria and the fungal phyla Ascomycota and Mucoromycota, showed different abundances in the two parts of the mature MT-Daqu, and different microbial communities were enriched in both parts. Additionally, pyrazines and alcohols were the most abundant volatile aroma compounds in the mature MT-Daqu.Entities:
Keywords: MT-Daqu; fermentation; mature; microbial community; physicochemical indices; volatile compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35966713 PMCID: PMC9363831 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.934696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Differences in physicochemical indices of samples during MT-Daqu production.
| MT- | Phase | Time (days) | Moisture (%) | Acidity (mmol/10 g) | Liquifying activity (g/g⋅h) | Saccharifying activity (mg/g⋅h) | Esterifying activity (mg/g⋅100h) | Fermenting activity (gCO2/g⋅72 h) |
| MDI | Fermentation | 1 | 33.85 ± 1.41a | 0.40 ± 0.08h | 0.25 ± 0.15cde | 722.50 ± 10.61a | 5.71 ± 0.22e | 1.79 ± 0.49ab |
| 5 | 34.40 ± 0.00a | 2.10 ± 0.07a | 0.29 ± 0.03cde | 22.50 ± 10.61f | 5.49 ± 1.46e | 2.02 ± 0.11a | ||
| 9 | 34.20 ± 1.13a | 1.90 ± 0.03a | 0.18 ± 0.10de | 52.50 ± 3.54f | 8.61 ± 0.98cd | 1.75 ± 0.08abc | ||
| 13 | 29.65 ± 1.06b | 1.40 ± 0.00b | 0.18 ± 0.06e | 95.00 ± 7.07f | 8.14 ± 0.79cd | 1.64 ± 0.19abc | ||
| 17 | 23.70 ± 1.97c | 1.30 ± 0.14bc | 0.45 ± 0.15b | 260.00 ± 14.14de | 6.78 ± 1.00de | 1.31 ± 0.03cd | ||
| 21 | 17.98 ± 0.45d | 1.1 ± 0.07de | 0.50 ± 0.09b | 335.00 ± 91.92cd | 8.930 ± 0.80c | 0.95 ± 0.01d | ||
| 26 | 16.45 ± 0.14de | 1.00 ± 0.00ef | 0.55 ± 0.03b | 222.50 ± 53.03e | 8.67 ± 1.00cd | 0.98 ± 0.01d | ||
| 31 | 18.17 ± 0.88d | 1.20 ± 0.00cd | 1.33 ± 0.06a | 440.00 ± 84.85bc | 13.95 ± 0.50ab | 0.95 ± 0.02d | ||
| Storage | 45 | 15.5 ± 0.50ef | 0.90 ± 0.14ef | 0.37 ± 0.02bc | 287.50 ± 60.10de | 12.45 ± 0.80b | 1.79 ± 0.31ab | |
| 60 | 12.68 ± 0.32f | 1.00 ± 0.07ef | 0.38 ± 0.07bc | 284.00 ± 36.77de | 13.15 ± 0.80ab | 1.45 ± 0.10bc | ||
| 75 | 13.295 ± 0.12f | 1.00 ± 0.07ef | 0.20 ± 0.11bc | 317.50 ± 24.75de | 13.65 ± 0.06ab | 1.62 ± 0.09bc | ||
| 90 | 12.09 ± 0.30f | 0.90 ± 0.07f | 0.40 ± 0.05bc | 351.13 ± 15.73bcd | 12.09 ± 0.04b | 1.49 ± 0.12bc | ||
| 120 | 12.12 ± 1.24f | 1.00 ± 0.03ef | 0.45 ± 0.10bc | 450.00 ± 42.43b | 13.88 ± 0.49ab | 1.31 ± 0.10cd | ||
| 150 | 12.13 ± 0.78f | 0.70 ± 0.05f | 0.50 ± 0.08bc | 424.00 ± 50.91bc | 14.86 ± 0.40a | 1.54 ± 0.06bc | ||
| MDO | Fermentation | 1 | 34.80 ± 0.28a | 0.63 ± 0.09cd | 0.20 ± 0.00d | 725.00 ± 7.07a | 5.91 ± 0.90g | 2.00 ± 0.24bc |
| 5 | 22.50 ± 0.35b | 0.80 ± 0.00b | 3.10 ± 0.14c | 855.00 ± 7.07b | 4.82 ± 0.59g | 2.29 ± 0.15a | ||
| 9 | 14.18 ± 2.01c | 0.70 ± 0.00bcd | 3.64 ± 0.06ab | 852.50 ± 3.53b | 12.27 ± 1.94abc | 2.22 ± 0.10ab | ||
| 13 | 12.38 ± 0.25d | 0.70 ± 0.00bcd | 3.92 ± 0.11a | 852.50 ± 17.67b | 8.01 ± 0.40e | 1.84 ± 0.12cd | ||
| 17 | 11.23 ± 0.67d | 0.75 ± 0.07bc | 3.33 ± 0.32bc | 855.00 ± 35.35b | 7.76 ± 1.21ef | 1.43 ± 0.15e | ||
| 21 | 12.43 ± 0.18d | 0.70 ± 0.00bc | 3.64 ± 0.29ab | 925.00 ± 14.14b | 9.78 ± 0.35de | 1.14 ± 0.08h | ||
| 26 | 13.95 ± 0.49cde | 0.65 ± 0.06c | 3.32 ± 0.16bc | 920.00 ± 21.21b | 8.56 ± 0.57e | 1.15 ± 0.02h | ||
| 31 | 14.08 ± 0.74c | 0.75 ± 0.07bc | 3.44 ± 0.18bc | 887.50 ± 67.17b | 11.92 ± 0.81bc | 1.26 ± 0.08gh | ||
| Storage | 45 | 13.50 ± 0.49ef | 0.60 ± 0.00d | 3.37 ± 0.08bc | 882.50 ± 17.68b | 11.22 ± 1.15cd | 1.50 ± 0.12efg | |
| 60 | 11.32 ± 0.40f | 0.75 ± 0700bc | 3.25 ± 0.21bc | 875.00 ± 7.07b | 11.16 ± 1.03cd | 1.32 ± 0.05gh | ||
| 75 | 12.40 ± 0.69f | 0.80 ± 0.00b | 3.44 ± 0.19bc | 888.50 ± 44.54b | 12.57 ± 0.01abc | 1.59 ± 0.09def | ||
| 90 | 12.05 ± 0.43f | 0.75 ± 0.07bc | 3.32 ± 0.14bc | 901.00 ± 41.01b | 12.79 ± 0.32abc | 1.67 ± 0.08cde | ||
| 120 | 12.05 ± 0.00f | 0.95 ± 0.07a | 3.30 ± 0.13bc | 850.00 ± 42.43b | 13.52 ± 0.70ab | 1.72 ± 0.04cde | ||
| 150 | 12.55 ± 0.57f | 1.00 ± 0.00a | 3.21 ± 0.06c | 915.00 ± 21.20b | 14.24 ± 0.58a | 1.57 ± 0.18defg |
Values are means of quadruplicates ± SD. The different letters (a–g) after value are significantly different (p < 0.05). MDI, the inner layers of MT-Daqu; MDO, the outer layers of MT-Daqu.
FIGURE 1Dynamics of culture-dependent bacteria (A) and fungi (B) in MT-Daqu during entire production, including 31-day fermentation period and 4 months storage. The upper and lower y-axis indicate the microbial counts in MDI (the inner layers of MT-Daqu) and MDO (the outer layers of MT-Daqu), respectively.
FIGURE 2Comparison of the bacteria (A) and fungi (B) in the MDI and MDO samples during storage. Significant differences are noted by * (p < 0.05) and ** (p < 0.01).
FIGURE 3Microbial composition in different parts of the mature MT-Daqu. (A) Bacterial and fungal composition at the phylum level (more than 0.5%); (B) bacterial and fungal composition at the genus level (more than 0.5%). MDI, inner layers of MT-Daqu; MDO, outer layers of MT-Daqu.
FIGURE 4Principal coordinates analysis score plots of microbial β-diversity based on Bray–Curtis distance (p < 0.05) and LEfSe analysis of the MDI and MDO samples (LDA > 3.5, p < 0.05). Bacterial (A,C) and fungal (B,D) taxa showed significantly different abundances.
FIGURE 5Relative abundance of six categories of volatile compounds in MDI and MDO samples of the mature MT-Daqu. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).