| Literature DB >> 31031019 |
Yan Wang1, Chuanhua Zhao1, Lianpeng Chang2, Ru Jia1, Rongrui Liu1, Yun Zhang1, Xuan Gao2, Jin Li2, Rongrong Chen2, Xuefeng Xia2, Ajaz Bulbul3, Hatim Husain3, Yanfang Guan2, Xin Yi4, Jianming Xu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) isolated from plasma contains genetic mutations that can be representative of those found in primary tumor tissue DNA. These samples can provide insights into tumoral heterogeneity in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Although trastuzumab has been shown to be effective in first-line therapy for patients with metastatic gastric cancer with overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), the mechanism of AGC resistance is incompletely understood.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced gastric cancer; Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); Monitoring; Resistance mechanism; Trastuzumab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31031019 PMCID: PMC6562020 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EBioMedicine ISSN: 2352-3964 Impact factor: 8.143
Clinical characteristics of patients with AGC.
| Characteristic | Patients ( |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Median (range) | 58 (35–61) |
| Sex, no. (%) | |
| Male | 17 (81) |
| Female | 4 (19) |
| ECOG performance status | |
| Median (range) | 1 (0–2) |
| Stage, no. (%) | |
| IIIA | 2 (10) |
| IIIC | 2 (10) |
| IV | 17 (80) |
| Tumor differentiation, no. (%) | |
| Well/Moderate | 8 (38) |
| Poor | 13 (62) |
| Lauren type, no. (%) | |
| Diffuse | 4 (19) |
| Intestinal | 7 (33) |
| Mixed | 10 (48) |
| Gastroesophageal junction involvement, no. (%) | |
| Yes | 10 (48) |
| No | 11 (52) |
| Liver involvement, no. (%) | |
| Yes | 15 (71) |
| No | 6 (28) |
| Lung involvement, no. (%) | |
| Yes | 10 (48) |
| No | 11 (52) |
| Prior chemotherapy regimens, no. | |
| Median (range) | 0 (0–3) |
Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Fig. 1Clonal mutations detected in paired samples and used to monitor serial ctDNA from patients who received chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. (A) Relationship between clonal mutations in baseline ctDNA and matched tissues. (B) Patient counts and fractions of detected TP53 mutation in different studies. (C) The mTBI of ctDNA before treatment and during progressive disease. Top: Tumor burden changed based on baseline status. The gray line indicates CT imaging results. The red line indicates ΔmTBI results. Progressive metastases are marked in red font at PD. Bottom: serial changes of CNV detected in ctDNA. Patient P07 received palliative surgery with continuous evaluation of PR. BL, baseline; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; NA, no available CT result; PS, palliative surgery; mTBI, molecular tumor burden index; CT, computed tomography. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Changes in ctDNA, imaging, and serum biomarker during progressive disease in patient P19. (A) CT: Imaging shows new metastasis in lung and liver. Therapy: treatment strategies and procedures. Sampling date: ctDNA sampled at baseline, the second treatment cycle, and when disease progressed. Characteristics of molecular clones: The diagram illustrates clone structure and selection in serial ctDNA. CEA: The levels of CEA increased during treatment. (B) Mutations identified in serial ctDNA. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; XP, capecitabine (xeloda)/cis‑platinum; T, trastuzumab; P, cis‑platinum; VAF, variated allele frequency.
Fig. 3Expanding mutations and trastuzumab resistance mechanism in AGC. (A) Levels of evidence of expanding mutations related to resistance mechanism, based on clinical or biological evidence reported and on predicted function. (B) Distribution of levels of expanding mutations. (C) Clonal temporal evolution in ctDNA of patient P07 during treatment. TP53 mutation (Clone 3) and EGFR CNV (Clone 5) expanded at progressive disease. (D) Clonal temporal evolution in ctDNA of patient P14 during treatment. KRAS CNV (Clone 1) and IGF1R mutations (Clone 8) expanded at progressive disease.
Fig. 4Validation of mTBI in relation to progressive disease and treatment outcome. (A) Increasing mTBI predicts progressive disease during the period (x-axis) in 16 patients receiving chemotherapy only. Red triangles indicate an increase in mTBI exceeding the cutoff (≥0.6%). Gray triangles indicate an increase in mTBI below the cutoff (≥0.6%), or no increase. Purple vertical lines indicate clinical progressive disease.
(B) Chemo validation group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival in patients with high pretreatment mTBI (≥1%) compared with patients with low pretreatment mTBI (<1%) in AGC. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis.
| Variable | PFS | OS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (≥65 years versus <65 years) | 0.79(0.28–2.25) | 0.658 | 0.16(0.03–0.76) | 0.021 |
| Gastroesophageal junction involvement (yes versus no) | 0.52(0.15–1.73) | 0.283 | 1.39(0.34–5.69) | 0.647 |
| Differentiation (poor versus well/moderate) | 0.45(0.12–1.66) | 0.231 | 1.69(0.29–9.7) | 0.556 |
| Lauren (diffuse versus intestinal/mixed) | 0.91(0.21–3.98) | 0.9 | 4.49(0.74–27.31) | 0.103 |
| HER2 status (positive versus negative) | 0.26(0.07–0.92) | 0.037 | 0.58(0.09–3.64) | 0.561 |
| Liver or lung involvement (yes versus no) | 0.72(0.2–2.57) | 0.617 | 2.34(0.45–12.07) | 0.311 |
| Baseline mTBI (≥1% versus <1%) | 13.75(2.69–70.24) | 0.002 | 8.19(0.83–80.95) | 0.072 |
Abbreviations: HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; mTBI, molecular tumor burden index; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
p ≤ 0.05