Literature DB >> 31030570

Extensive phenotype data and machine learning in prediction of mortality in acute coronary syndrome - the MADDEC study.

Jussi A Hernesniemi1,2, Shadi Mahdiani1,3, Juho A Tynkkynen1,4, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen1,2,5, Pashupati P Mishra5, Terho Lehtimäki1,5, Markku Eskola2, Kjell Nikus1,2, Kari Antila3, Niku Oksala1,5,6.   

Abstract

Objective: Investigation of the clinical potential of extensive phenotype data and machine learning (ML) in the prediction of mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Methods: The value of ML and extensive clinical data was analyzed in a retrospective registry study of 9066 consecutive ACS patients (January 2007 to October 2017). Main outcome was six-month mortality. Prediction models were developed using two ML methods, logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (xgboost). The models were fitted in training set of patients treated in 2007-2014 and 2017 (81%, n = 7344) and validated in a separate validation set of patients treated in 2015-2016 with full GRACE score data available for comparison of model accuracy (19%, n = 1722).
Results: Overall, six-month mortality was 7.3% (n = 660). Several variables were found to be significantly associated with six-month mortality by both ML methods. The xgboost scored the best performance: AUC 0.890 (0.864-0.916). The AUC values for logistic regression and GRACE score were 0.867(0.837-0.897) and 0.822 (0.785-0.859), respectively. The AUC value of xgboost was better when compared to logistic regression (p = .012) and GRACE score (p < .00001). Conclusions: The use of extensive phenotype data and novel machine learning improves prediction of mortality in ACS over traditional GRACE score. KEY MESSAGES The collection of extensive cardiovascular phenotype data from electronic health records as well as from data recorded by physicians can be used highly effectively in prediction of mortality after acute coronary syndrome. Supervised machine learning methods such as logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting using extensive phenotype data significantly outperform conventional risk assessment by the current golden standard GRACE score. Integration of electronic health records and the use of supervised machine learning methods can be easily applied in a single centre level to model the risk of mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Machine learning; acute coronary syndrome; mortality; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31030570      PMCID: PMC7857486          DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1596302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med        ISSN: 0785-3890            Impact factor:   4.709


  22 in total

1.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  David C Goff; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Glen Bennett; Sean Coady; Ralph B D'Agostino; Raymond Gibbons; Philip Greenland; Daniel T Lackland; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Jennifer G Robinson; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Paul Sorlie; Neil J Stone; Peter W F Wilson; Harmon S Jordan; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Christian W Hamm; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Stefan Agewall; Jeroen Bax; Eric Boersma; Hector Bueno; Pio Caso; Dariusz Dudek; Stephan Gielen; Kurt Huber; Magnus Ohman; Mark C Petrie; Frank Sonntag; Miguel Sousa Uva; Robert F Storey; William Wijns; Doron Zahger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Finding the missing link for big biomedical data.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber; Kenneth D Mandl; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Deep EHR: A Survey of Recent Advances in Deep Learning Techniques for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin Shickel; Patrick James Tighe; Azra Bihorac; Parisa Rashidi
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE).

Authors:  Keith A A Fox; Omar H Dabbous; Robert J Goldberg; Karen S Pieper; Kim A Eagle; Frans Van de Werf; Alvaro Avezum; Shaun G Goodman; Marcus D Flather; Frederick A Anderson; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-10

6.  Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events.

Authors:  Christopher B Granger; Robert J Goldberg; Omar Dabbous; Karen S Pieper; Kim A Eagle; Christopher P Cannon; Frans Van De Werf; Alvaro Avezum; Shaun G Goodman; Marcus D Flather; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-27

8.  Deep Patient: An Unsupervised Representation to Predict the Future of Patients from the Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Riccardo Miotto; Li Li; Brian A Kidd; Joel T Dudley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?

Authors:  Stephen F Weng; Jenna Reps; Joe Kai; Jonathan M Garibaldi; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential.

Authors:  Harry Hemingway; Folkert W Asselbergs; John Danesh; Richard Dobson; Nikolaos Maniadakis; Aldo Maggioni; Ghislaine J M van Thiel; Maureen Cronin; Gunnar Brobert; Panos Vardas; Stefan D Anker; Diederick E Grobbee; Spiros Denaxas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Sara Chopannejad; Farahnaz Sadoughi; Rafat Bagherzadeh; Sakineh Shekarchi
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Current Insights and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ikram U Haq; Karanjot Chhatwal; Krishna Sanaka; Bo Xu
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2022-07-12

3.  Improving 1-year mortality prediction in ACS patients using machine learning.

Authors:  Sebastian Weichwald; Alessandro Candreva; Rebekka Burkholz; Roland Klingenberg; Lorenz Räber; Dik Heg; Robert Manka; Baris Gencer; François Mach; David Nanchen; Nicolas Rodondi; Stephan Windecker; Reijo Laaksonen; Stanley L Hazen; Arnold von Eckardstein; Frank Ruschitzka; Thomas F Lüscher; Joachim M Buhmann; Christian M Matter
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Prehospital Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Blocker Use, Culprit Artery Flow, and Mortality in STEMI: The MADDEC Study.

Authors:  Markus Hautamäki; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Markku Eskola; Terho Lehtimäki; Kjell Nikus; Niku Oksala; Juho Tynkkynen; Jussi Hernesniemi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Prediction of Genotype Positivity in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Lusha W Liang; Michael A Fifer; Kohei Hasegawa; Mathew S Maurer; Muredach P Reilly; Yuichi J Shimada
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2021-04-23

6.  A Machine Learning-Based Model to Predict Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy in Trauma Patients Upon Emergency Hospitalization.

Authors:  Kaiyuan Li; Huitao Wu; Fei Pan; Li Chen; Cong Feng; Yihao Liu; Hui Hui; Xiaoyu Cai; Hebin Che; Yulong Ma; Tanshi Li
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  Machine learning for subtype definition and risk prediction in heart failure, acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation: systematic review of validity and clinical utility.

Authors:  Amitava Banerjee; Suliang Chen; Ghazaleh Fatemifar; Mohamad Zeina; R Thomas Lumbers; Johanna Mielke; Simrat Gill; Dipak Kotecha; Daniel F Freitag; Spiros Denaxas; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.150

8.  Combining machine learning and conventional statistical approaches for risk factor discovery in a large cohort study.

Authors:  Iqbal Madakkatel; Ang Zhou; Mark D McDonnell; Elina Hyppönen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Identification of Variable Importance for Predictions of Mortality From COVID-19 Using AI Models for Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Brett Snider; Edward A McBean; John Yawney; S Andrew Gadsden; Bhumi Patel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-21

Review 10.  Comparison of Conventional Statistical Methods with Machine Learning in Medicine: Diagnosis, Drug Development, and Treatment.

Authors:  Hema Sekhar Reddy Rajula; Giuseppe Verlato; Mirko Manchia; Nadia Antonucci; Vassilios Fanos
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.