Literature DB >> 3102782

Impact of nutritional status on DRG length of stay.

G Robinson, M Goldstein, G M Levine.   

Abstract

A prospective audit of 100 admissions to a general medical unit was performed to determine the relationship of the initial nutritional status of the patients to the actual length of stay and hospital charges. These data then were compared with the allowed length of stay and estimated reimbursement under the prospective payment system of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Forty-five percent of the malnourished patients were hospitalized longer than that allowed under DRGs, compared to 30% for normal patients and 37% in the borderline group. The average length of stay was 15.6 +/- 2.2 days in the malnourished group compared to approximately 10 days in the other two groups (p less than 0.01). Although the estimated base DRG reimbursement was similar in all three groups ($4352-$5124), the actual hospital charges were significantly greater in the malnourished ($16,691 +/- 4389) and borderline ($14,118 +/- 4962) groups compared to normals ($7692 +/- 687), (p less than 0.01). The DRG system will have an adverse financial impact in the care of malnourished patients. It is suggested that early recognition of malnutrition and aggressive treatment may lead to a decrease in the length of stay and cost deficit incurred by malnourished patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3102782     DOI: 10.1177/014860718701100149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  21 in total

1.  Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients.

Authors:  A M Keele; M J Bray; P W Emery; H D Duncan; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients.

Authors:  M Stroud; H Duncan; J Nightingale
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Additional costs of inpatient malnutrition, Victoria, Australia, 2003-2004.

Authors:  D S Rowell; T J Jackson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-04-18

4.  Survey of clinical nutrition practices of Canadian gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Donald R Duerksen
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature.

Authors:  Takero Mazaki; Kiyoko Ebisawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment.

Authors:  Adam Deane; Marianne J Chapman; Robert J Fraser; Laura K Bryant; Carly Burgstad; Nam Q Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Hospital inpatients' experiences of access to food: a qualitative interview and observational study.

Authors:  Smriti Naithani; Kevin Whelan; Jane Thomas; Martin C Gulliford; Myfanwy Morgan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Implementation of a computerized system in pediatric wards to improve nutritional care: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  A Duclos; S Touzet; L Restier; P Occelli; F Cour-Andlauer; A Denis; S Polazzi; C Colin; A Lachaux; N Peretti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of enteral nutritional supplements postoperatively in malnourished surgical patients.

Authors:  A H Beattie; A T Prach; J P Baxter; C R Pennington
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Malnutrition and ageing.

Authors:  M Hickson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.