BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred route for long-term enteral feeding. Our aims were to prospectively evaluate the outcome ("PEG status") and complications of PEG and to determine whether these can be predicted by patients' baseline characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in two tertiary hospitals between August 2003 and January 2005, enrolling all patients who were undergoing PEG placement. We completed a questionnaire with details of demographic data, diagnosis, indication for PEG, Charlson's co-morbidity index, Barthel's index, laboratory tests, complications, and date and cause of death. Patients were followed at scheduled appointments. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 168 patients (48% male, 52% female; mean age +/- standard deviation 74 +/- 16 years) underwent PEG using the pull technique. The main indication was neurogenic dysphagia (156 patients, 92.9%). Although most indications were appropriate, in half the cases these were established too late. There were no procedure-related deaths. Major complications occurred in four patients (2.4%); minor complications occurred in 52 patients (31%). No single variable could predict complications. Fifteen patients (9%) had the PEG removed. No single variable was independently associated with PEG removal. The mortality was 6.5% at 30 days, 17.3% at 90 days and 33.9% at 1 year. The C-reactive protein was the only predictive factor of early mortality (< or = 30 days), and Charlson's co-morbidity index was the only predictive factor of late mortality (> 30 days). CONCLUSIONS: PEG placement is an easy and safe procedure, although it is often requested too late. No single variable could predict complications or PEG removal. C-reactive protein was found to be predictive of early mortality and Charlson's index was predictive of late mortality.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred route for long-term enteral feeding. Our aims were to prospectively evaluate the outcome ("PEG status") and complications of PEG and to determine whether these can be predicted by patients' baseline characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in two tertiary hospitals between August 2003 and January 2005, enrolling all patients who were undergoing PEG placement. We completed a questionnaire with details of demographic data, diagnosis, indication for PEG, Charlson's co-morbidity index, Barthel's index, laboratory tests, complications, and date and cause of death. Patients were followed at scheduled appointments. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: 168 patients (48% male, 52% female; mean age +/- standard deviation 74 +/- 16 years) underwent PEG using the pull technique. The main indication was neurogenic dysphagia (156 patients, 92.9%). Although most indications were appropriate, in half the cases these were established too late. There were no procedure-related deaths. Major complications occurred in four patients (2.4%); minor complications occurred in 52 patients (31%). No single variable could predict complications. Fifteen patients (9%) had the PEG removed. No single variable was independently associated with PEG removal. The mortality was 6.5% at 30 days, 17.3% at 90 days and 33.9% at 1 year. The C-reactive protein was the only predictive factor of early mortality (< or = 30 days), and Charlson's co-morbidity index was the only predictive factor of late mortality (> 30 days). CONCLUSIONS:PEG placement is an easy and safe procedure, although it is often requested too late. No single variable could predict complications or PEG removal. C-reactive protein was found to be predictive of early mortality and Charlson's index was predictive of late mortality.
Authors: Julian Cheron; Jacques Deviere; Frederic Supiot; Asuncion Ballarin; Pierre Eisendrath; Emmanuel Toussaint; Vincent Huberty; Carmen Musala; Daniel Blero; Arnaud Lemmers; André Van Gossum; Marianna Arvanitakis Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Jared P Beller; Daniel Phadke; Elizabeth D Krebs; William Z Chancellor; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert B Hawkins; Robert G Sawyer; Gorav Ailawadi; Leora T Yarboro Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Hans Juergen Richter-Schrag; Sabine Richter; Olaf Ruthmann; Manfred Olschewski; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Andreas Fischer Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: O Ruthmann; A Seitz; S Richter; G Marjanovic; M Olschewski; U T Hopt; A Fischer; H-J Schrag Journal: Chirurg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: Perry H Dubin; Amelia K Boehme; James E Siegler; Amir Shaban; Jenifer Juengling; Karen C Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sang Pyo Lee; Kang Nyeong Lee; Oh Young Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Dae Won Jun; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi; Seung Hyun Kim Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 3.199