Eduardo Balsa1, Meghan S Soustek1, Ajith Thomas1, Sara Cogliati2, Carolina García-Poyatos2, Elena Martín-García2, Mark Jedrychowski3, Steve P Gygi3, José Antonio Enriquez4, Pere Puigserver5. 1. Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 2. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain. 3. Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 4. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBERFES, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid 28029, Spain. 5. Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: pere_puigserver@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein response are energetically challenging under nutrient stress conditions. However, the regulatory mechanisms that control the energetic demand under nutrient and ER stress are largely unknown. Here we show that ER stress and glucose deprivation stimulate mitochondrial bioenergetics and formation of respiratory supercomplexes (SCs) through protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK). Genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of PERK suppresses nutrient and ER stress-mediated increases in SC levels and reduces oxidative phosphorylation-dependent ATP production. Conversely, PERK activation augments respiratory SCs. The PERK-eIF2α-ATF4 axis increases supercomplex assembly factor 1 (SCAF1 or COX7A2L), promoting SCs and enhanced mitochondrial respiration. PERK activation is sufficient to rescue bioenergetic defects caused by complex I missense mutations derived from mitochondrial disease patients. These studies have identified an energetic communication between ER and mitochondria, with implications in cell survival and diseases associated with mitochondrial failures. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein respn>onse are energetically challenging under nutrient n>an class="Disease">stress conditions. However, the regulatory mechanisms that control the energetic demand under nutrient and ER stress are largely unknown. Here we show that ER stress and glucose deprivation stimulate mitochondrial bioenergetics and formation of respiratory supercomplexes (SCs) through protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK). Genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of PERK suppresses nutrient and ER stress-mediated increases in SC levels and reduces oxidative phosphorylation-dependent ATP production. Conversely, PERKactivation augments respiratory SCs. The PERK-eIF2α-ATF4 axis increases supercomplex assembly factor 1 (SCAF1 or COX7A2L), promoting SCs and enhanced mitochondrial respiration. PERKactivation is sufficient to rescue bioenergetic defects caused by complex I missense mutations derived from mitochondrial diseasepatients. These studies have identified an energetic communication between ER and mitochondria, with implications in cell survival and diseases associated with mitochondrial failures. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
ATF4; ER stress; PERK; hexosamine pathway; mitochondria; mitochondrial cristae; mitochondrial diseases; nutrient stress; protein glycosylation; respiratory chain supercomplexes
Authors: Jonathan G Van Vranken; Sara M Nowinski; Katie J Clowers; Mi-Young Jeong; Yeyun Ouyang; Jordan A Berg; Jeremy P Gygi; Steven P Gygi; Dennis R Winge; Jared Rutter Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Joeva J Barrow; Eduardo Balsa; Francisco Verdeguer; Clint D J Tavares; Meghan S Soustek; Louis R Hollingsworth; Mark Jedrychowski; Rutger Vogel; Joao A Paulo; Jan Smeitink; Steve P Gygi; John Doench; David E Root; Pere Puigserver Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Vishal M Gohil; Sunil A Sheth; Roland Nilsson; Andrew P Wojtovich; Jeong Hyun Lee; Fabiana Perocchi; William Chen; Clary B Clish; Cenk Ayata; Paul S Brookes; Vamsi K Mootha Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-02-14 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Kıvanç Birsoy; Richard Possemato; Franziska K Lorbeer; Erol C Bayraktar; Prathapan Thiru; Burcu Yucel; Tim Wang; Walter W Chen; Clary B Clish; David M Sabatini Journal: Nature Date: 2014-03-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Justine Lebeau; Jaclyn M Saunders; Vivian W R Moraes; Aparajita Madhavan; Nicole Madrazo; Mary C Anthony; R Luke Wiseman Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Thomas Pfannschmidt; Matthew J Terry; Olivier Van Aken; Pedro M Quiros Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Zhangsen Zhou; Mauricio Torres; Haibo Sha; Christopher J Halbrook; Françoise Van den Bergh; Rachel B Reinert; Tatsuya Yamada; Siwen Wang; Yingying Luo; Allen H Hunter; Chunqing Wang; Thomas H Sanderson; Meilian Liu; Aaron Taylor; Hiromi Sesaki; Costas A Lyssiotis; Jun Wu; Sander Kersten; Daniel A Beard; Ling Qi Journal: Science Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Willian A da Silveira; Hossein Fazelinia; Sara Brin Rosenthal; Evagelia C Laiakis; Man S Kim; Cem Meydan; Yared Kidane; Komal S Rathi; Scott M Smith; Benjamin Stear; Yue Ying; Yuanchao Zhang; Jonathan Foox; Susana Zanello; Brian Crucian; Dong Wang; Adrienne Nugent; Helio A Costa; Sara R Zwart; Sonja Schrepfer; R A Leo Elworth; Nicolae Sapoval; Todd Treangen; Matthew MacKay; Nandan S Gokhale; Stacy M Horner; Larry N Singh; Douglas C Wallace; Jeffrey S Willey; Jonathan C Schisler; Robert Meller; J Tyson McDonald; Kathleen M Fisch; Gary Hardiman; Deanne Taylor; Christopher E Mason; Sylvain V Costes; Afshin Beheshti Journal: Cell Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 41.582