| Literature DB >> 31019721 |
Amare Alemu1, Mekuanint Geta1, Selomon Taye2, Setegn Eshetie1, Tigist Engda1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diarrhea caused by Shigella species remains a major public health threat especially in the pediatric population. A regular surveillance system needs to be in place, in order to explore the burden, antimicrobial resistance patterns and associated risk factors for Shigella infections. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and associated risk factors of Shigella infections among diarrheic pediatric population attending at selected healthcare institutions in Gondar town.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Diarrhea; Pediatric population; Prevalence; Risk factors; Shigella
Year: 2019 PMID: 31019721 PMCID: PMC6471950 DOI: 10.1186/s40794-019-0079-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines ISSN: 2055-0936
Distributions of socio-demographic characteristics of children and parents attended at selected Gondar town healthcare institutions, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018, n = 272
| Variables | Categories | Frequency | Percent(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 151 | 55.5 |
| Female | 121 | 44.5 | |
| Age | ≤5 | 181 | 66.5 |
| > 5 years | 91 | 33.5 | |
| Residence | Urban | 251 | 92.3 |
| Rural | 21 | 7.7 | |
| Income (family) | < 500 birr | 19 | 7 |
| 500–1000 birr | 69 | 25.4 | |
| > 1000 birr | 184 | 67.6 | |
| Educational status | Illiterate | 59 | 21.7 |
| Only read and write | 32 | 11.8 | |
| Primary school | 54 | 19.9 | |
| Secondary school | 47 | 17.3 | |
| College and university | 80 | 29.4 |
Prevalence and associated risk factors of Shigella species in diarrheic pediatric population attended at selected Gondar town healthcare institutions, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018, n = 272
| Variables | Categories | Results of | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive (%) | Negative (%) | COR(95%CI) | AOR (95%Cl) | P-value | ||
| Sex | Male | 18(11.9%) | 133(88.1%) | 1.35(0.61–2.98) | – | |
| Female | 11(9.1%) | 110(90.9%) | 1 | – | ||
| Age | ≤5 years | 22(12.2%) | 159(87.8%) | 1.66(0.68–4.04) | – | |
| > 5 years | 7(7.7%) | 84(92.3%) | 1 | – | ||
| Breast feeding | Yes | 14(12.4%) | 99(87.6%) | 1 | – | |
| No | 15(9.4%) | 144(90.6%) | 0.74(0.3401.59) | – | ||
| Residence | Urban | 25(10.0%) | 226(90.0%) | 1 | – | |
| Rural | 4(19.0%) | 17(81.0%) | 2.13(0.66–6.82) | 1.43 (0.35–5.89) | 0.622 | |
| Income (family) | < 500 | 4(19.0%) | 17(81.0%) | 2.80(0.83–9.45) | 2.69 (0.62–11.63) | 0.186 |
| 500–1000 | 9(13.4%) | 58(86.6%) | 1.56(0.66–3.75) | – | ||
| > 1000 | 16(8.7%) | 168(91.3%) | 1 | – | ||
| Educational (family) | Illiterate | 15(25.4%) | 44(74.6%) | 5.11 (1.74–15.03) | 3.49 (1.01–12.04) | 0.047 |
| Only read and write | 1(3.1%) | 31(96.9%) | 0.48 (0.05–4.31) | – | ||
| Primary school | 6(11.1%) | 48(88.9%) | 1.87 (0.54–6.48) | – | ||
| Secondary school | 2(4.3%) | 45(95.7%) | 0.67(0.12–3.58) | – | ||
| College and university | 5(6.2%) | 75(93.8%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Water source | Unprotected well water | 2 (18.2%) | 9 (81.8%) | 1.94 (0.40–9.47) | – | |
| Surface water | 2(11.1%) | 16(88.9%) | 1.09 (0.24–5.02) | – | ||
| Piped tap water | 25(10.3%) | 218(89.7%) | 1 | – | ||
| Domestic animals | Yes | 8(14.3%) | 48 (85.7%) | 1.55(0.65–3.71) | – | |
| No | 21(9.7%) | 195 (90.3%) | 1 | – | ||
| Raw food | Yes | 21 (18.4%) | 93 (81.6%) | 4.23 (1.80–9.95) | 3.66 (1.45–9.24) | 0.006 |
| No | 8(5.1%) | 150(94.9%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Toilet | Open defecation | 14 (20.9%) | 53 (79.1%) | 3.35 (1.52–7.37) | 1.88 (0.73–4.84) | 0.192 |
| Latrine usage | 15(7.3%) | 190 (92.7%) | 1 | – | ||
| Hand Washing | Before preparing food | 13 (12.3%) | 93 (87.7%) | 1.94 (0.66–5.68) | 1.45 (0.44–4.73) | 0.541 |
| After defecating child | 6 (12.2%) | 43 (87.8%) | 1.95 (0.56–6.79) | 1.50 (0.36–6.19) | 0.579 | |
| After toilet use | 5 (11.9%) | 37 (88.1%) | 1.94 (0.53–7.16) | – | ||
| After cleaning anything | 5 (6.7%) | 70 (93.3%) | 1 | – | ||
| Nutritional status | Normal | 24(9.3%) | 235 (90.7%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Malnourished | 5(38.5%) | 8 (61.5%) | 6.12 (1.85–20.19) | 5.56 (1.42–21.76) | 0.014 | |
COR Crude Odds Ratio, AOR Adjusted Odds Ratio
The distribution of Shigella species in relation to different study sites in diarrheic pediatric population attended at selected Gondar town healthcare institutions, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018, n = 272
| Bacterial Species | Results | Hospital and Health Centers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUCRH ( | Gondar Health Center ( | Maraki Health Center ( | Dr. Mihretie Pediatric Specialty Clinic | ||
| Shigella species | Positive | 7 (5.9%) | 5 (16.7%) | 6 (24.0%) | 11 (11.2%) |
| Negative | 112 (94.1%) | 25 (83.3%) | 19 (76.0%) | 87 (88.8%) | |
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Shigella isolates among diarrheic pediatric population attended at selected Gondar town Healthcare institutions, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018
| Antibiotic Disc | Shigella species ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| S (%) | I (%) | R (%) | |
| Amoxicillin (AMX) | 1(3.4%) | 1 (3.4%) | 27 (93.1%) |
| Norfloxacin (NOR) | 22 (75.9%) | 5 (17.2%) | 2 (6.9%) |
| Cotrimoxazole (SXT) | 5 (17.2%) | 12 (41.4%) | 12 (41.4%) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) | 14 (48.3%) | 12 (41.4%) | 3 (10.3%) |
| Chloramphenicol (CAF) | 5 (17.2%) | 11 (37.9%) | 13 (44.8%) |
| Tetracycline (TE) | 2 (6.9%) | 1 (3.4%) | 26 (89.7%) |
| Nitrofurantoin (NIT) | 27(93.1%) | 2 (6.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Azithromycin (AZM) | 13 (44.8%) | 6 (20.7%) | 10 (34.5%) |
S Susceptible, I Intermediate, R Resistance
Multi-Drug Resistance patterns (MDR) of Shigella species isolated from diarrheic pediatric population attended at selected Gondar town Healthcare institutions, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018, n = 272
| Species | Resistance Antibiotics | Number of organisms | group |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| AMX | 1 | R1 |
| CAF | 1 | ||
| TE | |||
| AZM | 1 | ||
| AMC | |||
|
| SXT, AMX | 1 | R2 |
| AMC, CAF | 1 | ||
| TE, AZM | 1 | ||
| AZM, NIT | 1 | ||
| TE, CAF | 1 | ||
| NOR, AMX | 1 | ||
|
| AMX, TE, CAF, AZM | 1 | R3 |
| TE, AMC, AZM | 1 | ||
| TE, CAF, AZM | 1 | ||
| AMX, SXT, AMC, CAF | 1 | ||
| TE, AZM, SXT | 1 | ||
| AMX, SXT, CAF | 1 | ||
| AMX, SXT, AMC | 1 | ||
| TE, AZM, SXT | 1 | ||
| AMX, TE, AZM, SXT | 1 | ||
| TE, AMC, SXT | 1 | ||
| AMX, SXT, CAF, TE | 1 |
R1 Resistance for one drug, R2 Resistance for two drugs, ≥R3 Resistance for three or more drug