Literature DB >> 31019566

Biomechanical testing of trans-humeral all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.

Mikel Aramberri-Gutiérrez1, Amaia Martínez-Menduiña2, Simon Boyle3, Maria Valencia4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. All-suture anchors are increasingly being used in the arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this experimental study is to evaluate the biomechanical properties of all-suture anchors at different insertion sites in the proximal humerus relevant to rotator cuff repairs and the remplissage procedure.
METHODS: Sixteen cadaveric shoulders were used for the study. Four all-suture anchors were inserted in each proximal humerus at common anchor insertion sites on the rotator cuff footprint and a simulated Hill-Sachs defect. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure tests were undertaken. The number of cycles, load to failure and nature of failure were recorded.
RESULTS: The all-suture anchors placed in the cuff footprint using a transosseous technique displayed superior biomechanical properties. Sutures sited in this way demonstrated a maximum tensile load to failure of 542 N as well as a highest mean load to failure and the maximum number of cycles before anchor failure. In descending order, all-suture anchors placed in the lateral footprint were significantly superior to those located in the medial row and in a simulated Hill-Sachs defect. DISCUSSION: Anchors placed in the rotator cuff footprint exceeded the physiological isometric abduction forces for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Data obtained from our study suggest that all-suture anchors are strong enough to be used for the repair of rotator cuff tears.

Entities:  

Keywords:  all-suture anchors; biomechanical testing; rotator cuff repair

Year:  2018        PMID: 31019566      PMCID: PMC6463375          DOI: 10.1177/1758573218779078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  27 in total

1.  Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: A comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures.

Authors:  V K Goradia; D J Mullen; H R Boucher; B G Parks; J B O'Donnell
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Alberto G Schneeberger; Andreas von Roll; Fabian Kalberer; Hilaire A C Jacob; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Pullout strength of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; David Zurakowski; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of classic solid and novel all-soft suture anchors for glenoid labral repair.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; David Chowaniec; Mark P Cote; Joel Fierra; John Apostolakos; Michael Nowak; Robert A Arciero; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Biomechanical testing of a new knotless suture anchor compared with established anchors for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Matthias F Pietschmann; Valerie Froehlich; Andreas Ficklscherer; Bernd Wegener; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update.

Authors:  F Alan Barber; Morley A Herbert; Onur Hapa; Jay H Rapley; Cameron A K Barber; James A Bynum; Scott A Hrnack
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Shoulder muscle activity and function in common shoulder rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  Rafael F Escamilla; Kyle Yamashiro; Lonnie Paulos; James R Andrews
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Hill-sachs "remplissage": an arthroscopic solution for the engaging hill-sachs lesion.

Authors:  Robert J Purchase; Eugene M Wolf; E Rhett Hobgood; Michael E Pollock; Chad C Smalley
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Christopher R Adams; Sarah S Burkhart; John D Schoolfield
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Hill-Sachs defects and repair using osteoarticular allograft transplantation: biomechanical analysis using a joint compression model.

Authors:  Jon K Sekiya; Alexis C Wickwire; Jens H Stehle; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.