Literature DB >> 11288006

Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs: A comparison of bioabsorbable tacks with metal suture anchors and transosseous sutures.

V K Goradia1, D J Mullen, H R Boucher, B G Parks, J B O'Donnell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of the study were (1) to compare rotator cuff repair strengths after cyclic loading of 2 bioabsorbable nonsuture-based tack-type anchors, transosseous sutures, and a metal suture-based anchor, and (2) to correlate bone mineral density with mode of failure and cycles to failure. We hypothesized that specimens with a lower bone density would fail through bone at a lower number of cycles independent of the method of cuff fixation. TYPE OF STUDY: Ex vivo biomechanical study.
METHODS: Standardized full-thickness rotator cuff defects were created in 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders that were randomized to 1 of 4 repair groups: transosseous sutures; Mitek Super suture anchors (Mitek Surgical Products, Westwood, MA); smooth bioabsorbable 8-mm Suretacs (Acufex, Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Mansfield, MA); or spiked bioabsorbable 8-mm Suretacs (Acufex). All repairs were cyclically loaded from 10 to 180 N; the numbers of cycles to 50% (gap, 5 mm) and 100% (gap, 10 mm) failure were recorded.
RESULTS: In comparing the repair groups, we found only 1 significant difference: the number of cycles to 100% failure was significantly higher (P <.05) for the smooth bioabsorbable tack than for the transosseous suture group. There were no statistically significant (P </=.05) differences in bone mineral densities with regard to each specimen's mode of failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that immediate postoperative fixation provided by bioabsorbable tacks was similar to that provided by Mitek anchors and more stable than that provided by transosseous sutures. Therefore, the immediate postoperative biomechanical strength of bioabsorbable tacks seems comparatively adequate for fixation of selected small rotator cuff tears. However, additional evaluation in an animal model to examine degradation characteristics and sustained strength of repair is recommended before clinical use.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11288006     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.21243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of three techniques for fixation of tibial avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Yong In; Dai-Soon Kwak; Chan-Woong Moon; Seung-Ho Han; Nam-Yong Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Arthroscopic suturing of the rotator cuff. Placing of anchor, suturing and tying techniques].

Authors:  M Kettler; E Kurtoglu; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study.

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Rocco Papalia; Massimo Paganelli; Enzo Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The rotator cuff tear repair with a new arthroscopic transosseous system: the Sharc-FT(®).

Authors:  P Baudi; E Rasia Dani; G Campochiaro; M Rebuzzi; F Serafini; F Catani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

6.  Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques.

Authors:  Ahmet Fırat; Mustafa Aydın; Osman Tecimel; Ali Öçgüder; Yavuz Sanisoğlu; Mahmut Uğurlu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Foreign-Body Reaction and Osteolysis in Dorsal Lunate Dislocation Repair With Bioabsorbable Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Ezequiel Ernesto Zaidenberg; Pablo Roitman; Gerardo Luis Gallucci; Jorge Guillermo Boretto; Pablo De Carli
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-10

8.  Rotator cuff repair with periosteum for enhancing tendon-bone healing: a biomechanical and histological study in rabbits.

Authors:  Chih-Hsiang Chang; Chih-Hwa Chen; Chun-Yi Su; Hsien-Tao Liu; Chung-Ming Yu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Intraosseous foreign body granuloma in rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable suture anchor.

Authors:  T Nusselt; S Freche; H-M Klinger; M H Baums
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Current biomechanical concepts for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.