Literature DB >> 3101865

Economic consequences of postinfarction prophylaxis with beta blockers: cost effectiveness of metoprolol.

G Olsson, L A Levin, N Rehnqvist.   

Abstract

Treatment with certain beta adrenoceptor blocking agents after myocardial infarction reduces mortality and the incidence of reinfarction. Data from a randomised placebo controlled study of the beta 1 selective blocker metoprolol given as secondary prophylaxis were therefore analysed for the possible cost effectiveness of extending this treatment to the general population of patients with myocardial infarction. Metoprolol 100 mg twice daily and matching placebo were given to 154 and 147 patients, respectively, for three years. During this period drug costs for the beta blocker, digitalis, and diuretics were analysed as well as costs of readmission for cardiac problems and indirect costs arising from sick leave or early retirement. Active treatment with metoprolol significantly reduced costs of readmission as well as indirect costs. The net effect per patient over the three years was a reduction of roughly kr 19,000 (1930 pounds). These results suggest that beta blocker treatment given as secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction is highly cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3101865      PMCID: PMC1245351          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6568.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  8 in total

1.  Quality of life after myocardial infarction: effect of long term metoprolol on mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  G Olsson; J Lubsen; G A van Es; N Rehnqvist
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-06-07

2.  Evaluation of antiarrhythmic effect of metoprolol treatment after acute myocardial infarction: relationship between treatment responses and survival during a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  G Olsson; N Rehnqvist
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Should every survivor of a heart attack be given a beta blocker? Part II. Evidence from a clinical pharmacological standpoint.

Authors:  A Breckenridge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-07-03

Review 4.  Secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: a review of long-term trials.

Authors:  G S May; K A Eberlein; C D Furberg; E R Passamani; D L DeMets
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.194

5.  Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind randomised trial.

Authors:  A Hjalmarson; D Elmfeldt; J Herlitz; S Holmberg; I Málek; G Nyberg; L Rydén; K Swedberg; A Vedin; F Waagstein; A Waldenström; J Waldenström; H Wedel; L Wilhelmsen; C Wilhelmsson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-10-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pitfalls in the serial assessment of cardiac functional status. How a reduction in "ordinary" activity may reduce the apparent degree of cardiac compromise and give a misleading impression of improvement.

Authors:  L Goldman; E F Cook; N Mitchell; M Flatley; H Sherman; P F Cohn
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

7.  Smoking and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C Wilhelmsson; J A Vedin; D Elmfeldt; G Tibblin; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Long-term treatment with metoprolol after myocardial infarction: effect on 3 year mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  G Olsson; N Rehnqvist; A Sjögren; L Erhardt; T Lundman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 24.094

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Indirect costs in economic studies: confronting the confusion.

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap; F F Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  An economic analysis of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Study. Application to the United Kingdom.

Authors:  S Hummel; J Piercy; R Wright; A Davie; A Bagust; J McMurray
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Risk factors, interventions and therapeutic agents in the prevention of atherosclerosis-related ischaemic diseases.

Authors:  M Verstraete
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D H Peters; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment: metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics.

Authors:  M Johannesson; J Wikstrand; B Jönsson; G Berglund; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The cost effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden.

Authors:  M Johannesson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost effectiveness and equity of a community based cardiovascular disease prevention programme in Norsjö, Sweden.

Authors:  L Lindholm; M Rosén; L Weinehall; K Asplund
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  The cost of treating dyslipidaemia using National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines.

Authors:  J M McKenney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sanam Safi; Naqash J Sethi; Steven Kwasi Korang; Emil Eik Nielsen; Joshua Feinberg; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-05

10.  Economic aspects of beta-blocker therapy following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Olsson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 18.000

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.