Literature DB >> 3087488

Quality of life after myocardial infarction: effect of long term metoprolol on mortality and morbidity.

G Olsson, J Lubsen, G A van Es, N Rehnqvist.   

Abstract

A double blind randomised study of 154 patients with myocardial infarction assigned to metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) and 147 assigned to placebo compared the effects of treatment in relation to health state over three years. Health state was evaluated by a new method based on the average number of days spent in each of seven mutually exclusive categories of health. The scale took into account death, history of serious complications, functional state, and side effects of treatment. Of the maximum attainable 1095 days alive during the three years patients given metoprolol attained 992 days and those given placebo 964 days. During the period alive the metoprolol treated group spent an average of 278 days in an optimal functional state as compared with 176 days for the placebo treated group. This included 221 and 156 days respectively in a completely asymptomatic state (that is, without either cardiac symptoms or side effects of treatment). The time spent with a serious non-fatal complication was shortened by 56 days in the metoprolol group. The overall differences between the groups were statistically significant (p = 0.03). Aside from bringing an improved quality of life after myocardial infarction, metoprolol may add up to one month to life expectancy for three years of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3087488      PMCID: PMC1340495          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6534.1491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  4 in total

1.  Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind randomised trial.

Authors:  A Hjalmarson; D Elmfeldt; J Herlitz; S Holmberg; I Málek; G Nyberg; L Rydén; K Swedberg; A Vedin; F Waagstein; A Waldenström; J Waldenström; H Wedel; L Wilhelmsen; C Wilhelmsson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-10-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pitfalls in the serial assessment of cardiac functional status. How a reduction in "ordinary" activity may reduce the apparent degree of cardiac compromise and give a misleading impression of improvement.

Authors:  L Goldman; E F Cook; N Mitchell; M Flatley; H Sherman; P F Cohn
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

3.  Rebound phenomena following gradual withdrawal of chronic metoprolol treatment in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  G Olsson; P Hjemdahl; N Rehnqvist
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Long-term treatment with metoprolol after myocardial infarction: effect on 3 year mortality and morbidity.

Authors:  G Olsson; N Rehnqvist; A Sjögren; L Erhardt; T Lundman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 24.094

  4 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; S J Veldhuyzen Van Zanten; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Heart failure treatments: issues of safety versus issues of quality of life.

Authors:  J Feenstra; J Lubsen; D E Grobbee; B H Stricker
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Measurement of the quality of life in congestive heart failure-Influence of drug therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Bulpitt; Astrid E Fletcher
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  Quality of life instruments in the evaluation of new drugs.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D Cook
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D H Peters; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Assessing quality of life in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  A Jacoby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Cost benefit analysis of early thrombolytic treatment with intracoronary streptokinase. Twelve month follow up report of the randomised multicentre trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands.

Authors:  F Vermeer; M L Simoons; C de Zwaan; G A van Es; F W Verheugt; A van der Laarse; D C van Hoogenhuyze; A J Azar; F J van Dalen; J Lubsen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-05

Review 9.  Goals of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  G E McVeigh; J Flack; R Grimm
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Quality of life and care in leukemia, myeloma and non-malignant disease. Opinions of patients and relatives, and effects of geography and time.

Authors:  E Osby; P Reizenstein
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1989
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.