Literature DB >> 31018183

Parameterizing and validating existing algorithms for identifying out-of-bed time using hip-worn accelerometer data from older women.

John Bellettiere1, Yiliang Zhang, Vincent Berardi, Kelsie M Full, Jacqueline Kerr, Michael J LaMonte, Kelly R Evenson, Melbourne Hovell, Andrea Z LaCroix, Chongzhi Di.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To parameterize and validate two existing algorithms for identifying out-of-bed time using 24 h hip-worn accelerometer data from older women. APPROACH: Overall, 628 women (80  ±  6 years old) wore ActiGraph GT3X+  accelerometers 24 h d-1 for up to 7 d and concurrently completed sleep-logs. Trained staff used a validated visual analysis protocol to measure in-bed periods on accelerometer tracings (criterion). The Tracy and McVeigh algorithms were adapted for optimal use in older adults. A training set of 314 women was used to choose two key thresholds by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity for each algorithm and data (vertical axis, VA, and vector magnitude [VM]) combination. Data from the remaining 314 women were then used to test agreement in waking wear time (i.e. out-of-bed time while wearing the accelerometer) by computing sensitivity, specificity, and kappa comparing the algorithm output with the criterion. Waking wear time-adjusted means of sedentary time, light-intensity physical activity (light PA) and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) were then estimated and compared. MAIN
RESULTS: Waking wear time agreement with the criterion was high for Tracy_VA, Tracy_VM, McVeigh_VA, and highest for McVeigh_VM. Compared to the criterion, McVeigh_VM had mean sensitivity  =  0.92, specificity  =  0.87, kappa  =  0.80, and overall mean difference (±SD) of  -0.04  ±  2.5 h d-1. Minutes of sedentary time, light PA, and MVPA adjusted for waking wear time using the criterion measure and McVeigh_VM were not statistically different (p   >  0.43|all). SIGNIFICANCE: The McVeigh algorithm with optimal parameters using VM performed best compared to criterion sleep-log assisted visual analysis and is suitable for automated identification of waking wear time in older women when visual analysis is not feasible.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31018183      PMCID: PMC6667297          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab1c04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  28 in total

Review 1.  Regression analysis of multiple source and multiple informant data from complex survey samples.

Authors:  Nicholas J Horton; Garrett M Fitzmaurice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer.

Authors:  P S Freedson; E Melanson; J Sirard
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; E M Simonsick; L Ferrucci; R J Glynn; L F Berkman; D G Blazer; P A Scherr; R B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1994-03

Review 4.  Redefining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring.

Authors:  Kong Y Chen; Kathleen F Janz; Weimo Zhu; Robert J Brychta
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer.

Authors:  Leena Choi; Suzanne Capen Ward; John F Schnelle; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults.

Authors:  Joanne A McVeigh; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Genevieve N Healy; James Slater; Peter R Eastwood; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 8.  The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Roger Cole; Cathy Alessi; Mark Chambers; William Moorcroft; Charles P Pollak
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Development and application of an automated algorithm to identify a window of consecutive days of accelerometer wear for large-scale studies.

Authors:  Eileen Rillamas-Sun; David M Buchner; Chongzhi Di; Kelly R Evenson; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 10.  Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Ulf Ekelund; Christine Delisle Nyström; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Marie Löf; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accelerometer-Measured Daily Steps, Physical Function, and Subsequent Fall Risk in Older Women: The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Women Study.

Authors:  Benjamin T Schumacher; John Bellettiere; Michael J LaMonte; Kelly R Evenson; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; David A Sleet; Charles B Eaton; Cora E Lewis; Karen L Margolis; Lesley F Tinker; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.109

2.  Associations of Daily Steps and Step Intensity With Incident Diabetes in a Prospective Cohort Study of Older Women: The OPACH Study.

Authors:  Alexis C Garduno; Andrea Z LaCroix; Michael J LaMonte; David W Dunstan; Kelly R Evenson; Guangxing Wang; Chongzhi Di; Benjamin T Schumacher; John Bellettiere
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 17.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.