Literature DB >> 15344194

Regression analysis of multiple source and multiple informant data from complex survey samples.

Nicholas J Horton1, Garrett M Fitzmaurice.   

Abstract

In this tutorial, we describe regression-based methods for analysing multiple source data arising from complex sample survey designs. We use the term 'multiple-source' data to encompass all cases where data are simultaneously obtained from multiple informants, or raters (e.g. self-reports, family members, health care providers, administrators) or via different/parallel instruments, indicators or methods (e.g. symptom rating scales, standardized diagnostic interviews, or clinical diagnoses). We review regression models for analysing multiple source risk factors or multiple source outcomes and show that they can be considered special cases of generalized linear models, albeit with correlated outcomes. We show how these methods can be extended to handle the common survey features of stratification, clustering, and sampling weights. We describe how to fit regression models with multiple source reports derived from complex sample surveys using general purpose statistical software. Finally, the methods are illustrated using data from two studies: the Stirling County Study and the Eastern Connecticut Child Survey. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15344194     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  31 in total

1.  Joint modeling of missing data due to non-participation and death in longitudinal aging studies.

Authors:  Kumar B Rajan; Sue E Leurgans
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The impact of different sources of body mass index assessment on smoking onset: An application of multiple-source information models.

Authors:  Maria Paola Caria; Rino Bellocco; Maria Rosaria Galanti; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Maximum likelihood estimation of marginal pairwise associations with multiple source predictors.

Authors:  Liam M O'Brien; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

4.  Analyzing multiple informant data from an evaluation of the health disparities collaboratives.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Bruce E Landon; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Research Review: Multi-informant integration in child and adolescent psychopathology diagnosis.

Authors:  Michelle M Martel; Kristian Markon; Gregory T Smith
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 8.982

6.  Method effects of the relation between family history of alcoholism and parent reports of offspring impulsive behavior.

Authors:  Angela M Haeny; Andrew K Littlefield; Phillip K Wood; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Research Methods in Child Disaster Studies: A Review of Studies Generated by the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks; the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami; and Hurricane Katrina.

Authors:  Betty Pfefferbaum; Carl F Weems; Brandon G Scott; Pascal Nitiéma; Mary A Noffsinger; Rose L Pfefferbaum; Vandana Varma; Amarsha Chakraburtty
Journal:  Child Youth Care Forum       Date:  2013-08-01

8.  Childhood maltreatment, emotional distress, and early adolescent sexual intercourse: multi-informant perspectives on parental monitoring.

Authors:  Sarah E Oberlander; Yan Wang; Richard Thompson; Terri Lewis; Laura J Proctor; Patricia Isbell; Diana J English; Howard Dubowitz; Alan J Litrownik; Maureen M Black
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-09-19

9.  Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.

Authors:  Jacqueline Kerr; Catherine R Marinac; Katherine Ellis; Suneeta Godbole; Aaron Hipp; Karen Glanz; Jonathan Mitchell; Francine Laden; Peter James; David Berrigan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Multiple indicator hidden Markov model with an application to medical utilization data.

Authors:  Melanie M Wall; Ran Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.