Literature DB >> 27652717

Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults.

Joanne A McVeigh1, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Genevieve N Healy, James Slater, Peter R Eastwood, Leon M Straker.   

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly using 24 h accelerometer wear protocols. No automated method has been published that accurately distinguishes 'waking' wear time from other data ('in-bed', non-wear, invalid days) in young adults. This study examined the validity of an automated algorithm developed to achieve this for hip-worn Actigraph GT3X  +  60 s epoch data. We compared the algorithm against a referent method ('into-bed' and 'out-of-bed' times visually identified by two independent raters) and benchmarked against two published algorithms. All methods used the same non-wear rules. The development sample (n  =  11) and validation sample (n  =  95) were Australian young adults from the Raine pregnancy cohort (54% female), all aged approximately 22 years. The agreement with Rater 1 in each minute's classification (yes/no) of waking wear time was examined as kappa (κ), limited to valid days (⩾10 h waking wear time per day) according to the algorithm and Rater 1. Bland-Altman methods assessed agreement in daily totals of waking wear and in-bed wear time. Excellent agreement (κ  >  0.75) was obtained between the raters for 80% of participants (median κ  =  0.94). The algorithm showed excellent agreement with Rater 1 (κ  >  0.75) for 89% of participants and poor agreement (κ  <  0.40) for 1%. In this sample, the algorithm (median κ  =  0.86) performed better than algorithms validated in children (median κ  =  0.77) and adolescents (median κ  =  0.66). The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between Rater 1 and the algorithm was 7 (-220, 234) min d-1 for waking wear time on valid days and  -41 (-309, 228) min d-1 for in-bed wear time. In this population, the automated algorithm's validity for identifying waking wear time was mostly good, not worse than inter-rater agreement, and better than the evaluated published alternatives. However, the algorithm requires improvement to better identify in-bed wear time.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27652717     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/10/1636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  14 in total

1.  Light intensity physical activity increases and sedentary behavior decreases following total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Frimpong; Joanne A McVeigh; Dick van der Jagt; Lipalo Mokete; Yusuf S Kaoje; Mohammed Tikly; Rebecca M Meiring
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Parameterizing and validating existing algorithms for identifying out-of-bed time using hip-worn accelerometer data from older women.

Authors:  John Bellettiere; Yiliang Zhang; Vincent Berardi; Kelsie M Full; Jacqueline Kerr; Michael J LaMonte; Kelly R Evenson; Melbourne Hovell; Andrea Z LaCroix; Chongzhi Di
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Feasibility of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with malignant pleural effusion.

Authors:  Emily Jeffery; Yc Gary Lee; Joanne McVeigh; Leon Straker; Troy Wooding; Robert U Newton; Carolyn Peddle-McIntyre
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Accelerometer-Derived Activity Phenotypes in Young Adults: a Latent Class Analysis.

Authors:  Erin K Howie; Anne L Smith; Joanne A McVeigh; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-10

5.  Identifying bedrest using 24-h waist or wrist accelerometry in adults.

Authors:  J Dustin Tracy; Sari Acra; Kong Y Chen; Maciej S Buchowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Health in Older Women (OPACH) Study.

Authors:  Andrea Z LaCroix; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; David Buchner; Kelly R Evenson; Chongzhi Di; I-Min Lee; Steve Marshall; Michael J LaMonte; Julie Hunt; Lesley Fels Tinker; Marcia Stefanick; Cora E Lewis; John Bellettiere; Amy H Herring
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Standing Desks in a Grade 4 Classroom over the Full School Year.

Authors:  Sharon Parry; Beatriz Ir de Oliveira; Joanne A McVeigh; Joyln Ee; Angela Jacques; Leon Straker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Protocol for a gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered in Australian football league settings (Aussie-FIT): A feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Eleanor Quested; Dominika Kwasnicka; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Daniel F Gucciardi; Deborah A Kerr; Kate Hunt; Suzanne Robinson; Philip J Morgan; Robert U Newton; Cindy Gray; Sally Wyke; Joanne McVeigh; Eva Malacova; Nikos Ntoumanis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Does a Classroom Standing Desk Intervention Modify Standing and Sitting Behaviour and Musculoskeletal Symptoms during School Time and Physical Activity during Waking Time?

Authors:  Jolyn Ee; Sharon Parry; Beatriz Ir de Oliveira; Joanne A McVeigh; Erin Howie; Leon Straker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Correlates of physical activity and sedentary time in young adults: the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study.

Authors:  Erin K Howie; Joanne A McVeigh; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Genevieve N Healy; Romola S Bucks; Peter R Eastwood; Leon M Straker
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.