Literature DB >> 24372600

Epistasis, pleiotropy, and the mutation load in sexual and asexual populations.

Denis Roze1, Alexandre Blanckaert.   

Abstract

Mutation may impose a substantial load on populations, which varies according to the reproductive mode of organisms. Over the past years, various authors used adaptive landscape models to predict the long-term effect of mutation on mean fitness; however, many of these studies assumed very weak mutation rates, so that at most one mutation segregates in the population. In this article, we derive several simple approximations (confirmed by simulations) for the mutation load at high mutation rate (U), using a general model that allows us to play with the number of selected traits (n), the degree of pleiotropy of mutations, and the shape of the fitness function (which affects the average sign and magnitude of epistasis among mutations). When mutations have strong fitness effects, the equilibrium fitness W¯ of sexuals and asexuals is close to e(-U); under weaker mutational effects, sexuals reach a different regime where W¯ is a simple function of U and of a parameter describing the shape of the fitness function. Contrarily to weak mutation results showing that W¯ is an increasing function of population size and a decreasing function of n, these parameters may have opposite effects in sexual populations at high mutation rate.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Adaptive landscape; epistasis; evolutionary quantitative genetics; multilocus models; mutation load; stabilizing selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24372600     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  The distribution of epistasis on simple fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; John J Welch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  The Nonstationary Dynamics of Fitness Distributions: Asexual Model with Epistasis and Standing Variation.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Lionel Roques
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The Fitness Effects of Spontaneous Mutations Nearly Unseen by Selection in a Bacterium with Multiple Chromosomes.

Authors:  Marcus M Dillon; Vaughn S Cooper
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Accelerating Mutational Load Is Not Due to Synergistic Epistasis or Mutator Alleles in Mutation Accumulation Lines of Yeast.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Jasmin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  What happens after inbreeding avoidance? Inbreeding by rejected relatives and the inclusive fitness benefit of inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Jane M Reid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Utility of Fisher's Geometric Model in Evolutionary Genetics.

Authors:  O Tenaillon
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 13.915

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.