Literature DB >> 33150956

The geometry and genetics of hybridization.

Hilde Schneemann1,2, Bianca De Sanctis1,3, Denis Roze4,5, Nicolas Bierne6, John J Welch1.   

Abstract

When divergent populations form hybrids, hybrid fitness can vary with genome composition, current environmental conditions, and the divergence history of the populations. We develop analytical predictions for hybrid fitness, which incorporate all three factors. The predictions are based on Fisher's geometric model, and apply to a wide range of population genetic parameter regimes and divergence conditions, including allopatry and parapatry, local adaptation, and drift. Results show that hybrid fitness can be decomposed into intrinsic effects of admixture and heterozygosity, and extrinsic effects of the (local) adaptedness of the parental lines. Effect sizes are determined by a handful of geometric distances, which have a simple biological interpretation. These distances also reflect the mode and amount of divergence, such that there is convergence toward a characteristic pattern of intrinsic isolation. We next connect our results to the quantitative genetics of line crosses in variable or patchy environments. This means that the geometrical distances can be estimated from cross data, and provides a simple interpretation of the "composite effects." Finally, we develop extensions to the model, involving selectively induced disequilibria, and variable phenotypic dominance. The geometry of fitness landscapes provides a unifying framework for understanding speciation, and wider patterns of hybrid fitness.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fisher's geometric model; hybrid fitness; line crosses; quantitative genetics; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150956      PMCID: PMC7839769          DOI: 10.1111/evo.14116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   4.171


  56 in total

1.  How informative is Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character?

Authors:  Z B Zeng; D Houle; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Testing natural selection vs. genetic drift in phenotypic evolution using quantitative trait locus data.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  THE GENETIC INTERPRETATION OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND OUTBREEDING DEPRESSION.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Pleiotropic models of quantitative variation.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The role of homoploid hybridization in evolution: a century of studies synthesizing genetics and ecology.

Authors:  Sarah B Yakimowski; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  The genetics of speciation: Insights from Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; P Alexander Gunnarsson; Denis Roze; Nicolas Bierne; John J Welch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Quantifying organismal complexity using a population genetic approach.

Authors:  Olivier Tenaillon; Olin K Silander; Jean-Philippe Uzan; Lin Chao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do settlement dynamics influence competitive interactions between an alien tunicate and its native congener?

Authors:  Sarah Bouchemousse; Laurent Lévêque; Frédérique Viard
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Coadapted genomes and selection on hybrids: Fisher's geometric model explains a variety of empirical patterns.

Authors:  Alexis Simon; Nicolas Bierne; John J Welch
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-08-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Hybrid fitness effects modify fixation probabilities of introgressed alleles.

Authors:  Aaron Pfennig; Joseph Lachance
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.542

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.