| Literature DB >> 31006277 |
Hongde Zhen1,2, Xiang Qian2, Xiaoxuan Fu1, Zhuo Chen1, Aiqin Zhang2, Lei Shi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shaoyao Ruangan mixture (SRM) has been applied clinically for more than 20 years in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital to treat patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Intestinal microecology plays an important role in the emergence of liver diseases. This study aimed to reveal connections among SRM, intestinal microbiota and PLC, and the potential targets of SRM for liver cancer.Entities:
Keywords: IL-10; Shaoyao Ruangan mixture; intestinal flora; primary liver cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31006277 PMCID: PMC6477757 DOI: 10.1177/1534735419843178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Cancer Ther ISSN: 1534-7354 Impact factor: 3.279
Figure 1.Size and number of tumors in the model group and the treatment group. After weighing the case by number, a Mann-Whitney test was performed (Z = −2.032, P = .042).
Figure 2.The body weight of the mice changed over time. Analysis of variance of repeated measurement data was used to examine the effects of time and group on mouse body weight and their interactions. The corrected intrasubject effect (time) was statistically significant (P = .003). The intersubject effect (group) test had a P value of .232, and there was no significant difference in mouse body weight in different groups. The interaction effect analysis revealed an interaction between group and time, which meant that group allocation influenced the trend in mouse body weight over time (P = .039).
Figure 3.Taxa abundance histogram at the genus level.
Figure 4.Significantly different taxa at the genus level. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify taxa with significant differences between groups (P < .05). *P < .05, **P < .01.
Figure 5.A scatter plot of serum interleukin (IL)-10 levels and Bacteroides abundance. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.837 (P < .05) in the control group, 0.856 (P < .05) in the model group, and 0.898 (P < .01) in the treatment group.
Figure 6.(A) Spearman correlation analysis of the control group and the model group. (B) Spearman correlation analysis of the model group and the treatment group. Blue indicates a positive correlation, and red indicates a negative correlation. A darker color indicates a stronger correlation between taxa.