Ahsan Irshad1, Huijun Guo2, Shunlin Zhang3, Jiayu Gu4, Linshu Zhao5, Yongdun Xie6, Hongchun Xiong7, Shirong Zhao8, Yuping Ding9, Youzhi Ma10, Luxiang Liu11. 1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. ahsanirshad@126.com. 2. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. guohuijun@caas.cn. 3. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. zhangshunlin1994@163.com. 4. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. guijiayu@caas.cn. 5. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. zhaolinshu@caas.cn. 6. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. xieyongdun@caas.cn. 7. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. xionghongchun@caas.cn. 8. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. zhaoshirong@caas.cn. 9. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. dingyuping@caas.cn. 10. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. mayouzhi@caas.cn. 11. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Molecular Breeding/National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Beijing 100081, China. liuluxiang@caas.cn.
Abstract
Wheat is a staple food commodity grown worldwide, and wheat starch is a valuable source of energy and carbon that constitutes 80% of the grain weight. Manipulation of genes involved in starch synthesis significantly affects wheat grain weight and yield. TaSSIV plays an important role in starch synthesis and its main function is granule formation. To mine and stack more favorable alleles, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TaSSIV-A, B, and D were investigated across 362 wheat accessions by Ecotype-Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genome (EcoTILLING). As a result, a total of 38 SNPs in the amplified regions of three TaSSIV genes were identified, of which 10, 15, and 13 were in TaSSIV-A, B, and D, respectively. These 38 SNPs were evaluated by using KASP and six SNPs showed an allele frequency >5% whereas the rest were <5%, i.e., considered to be minor alleles. In the Chinese mini core collection, three haplotypes were detected for TaSSIV-A and three for TaSSIV-B. The results of an association study in the Chinese mini core collection with thousand grain weight (TGW) and spike length (SPL) showed that Hap-2-1A was significantly associated with TGW and Hap-3-1B with SPL. Allelic frequency and geographic distribution indicated that the favored haplotype (Hap-2-1A) has been positively selected in Chinese wheat breeding. These results suggested that the Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) markers can be applied in starch improvement to ultimately improve wheat yield by marker assisted selection in wheat breeding.
Wheat is a staple food commodity grown worldwide, and wheatstarch is a valuable source of energy and carbon that constitutes 80% of the grain weight. Manipulation of genes involved in starch synthesis significantly affects wheat grain weight and yield. TaSSIV plays an important role in starch synthesis and its main function is granule formation. To mine and stack more favorable alleles, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TaSSIV-A, B, and D were investigated across 362 wheat accessions by Ecotype-Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genome (EcoTILLING). As a result, a total of 38 SNPs in the amplified regions of three TaSSIV genes were identified, of which 10, 15, and 13 were in TaSSIV-A, B, and D, respectively. These 38 SNPs were evaluated by using KASP and six SNPs showed an allele frequency >5% whereas the rest were <5%, i.e., considered to be minor alleles. In the Chinese mini core collection, three haplotypes were detected for TaSSIV-A and three for TaSSIV-B. The results of an association study in the Chinese mini core collection with thousand grain weight (TGW) and spike length (SPL) showed that Hap-2-1A was significantly associated with TGW and Hap-3-1B with SPL. Allelic frequency and geographic distribution indicated that the favored haplotype (Hap-2-1A) has been positively selected in Chinese wheat breeding. These results suggested that the Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) markers can be applied in starch improvement to ultimately improve wheat yield by marker assisted selection in wheat breeding.
Breeding for yield potential of cereal crops due to a surging population is an important priority. Wheat is a staple food commodity for the ever-growing worldwide population. Wheat is central to food security and has a large share of required calories globally. Starch is a valuable source of carbon and energy. In leaves, starch is synthesized during daytime from photosynthetically-fixed carbon and is mobilized in the night time. It is also synthesized in other transient organs such as root cap cells and meristems, but major storage organs are fruits, tubers, seeds, and roots [1]. At the physiological level, seed crop yields are mainly determined by source and sink relationships [2]. Strength of source for photoassimilates is dictated by both the photosynthetic rate and the rate of photoassimilate remobilization from source tissues. In wheat, sink capacity is more important than source accumulation [3], hence, exploitation of enzymes involved in starch synthesis will be more effective in breeding for increased wheat yield [4].In plants, starch is degraded at night during the process of respiration and helps the formation of sucrose. Starch consists of amylose and amylopectin. Amylopectin is the major part of starch, contributing about 75% of starch granules [5]. Different enzymes are involved in the formation of starch such as ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylases (AGPase) and starch synthases (SS) [6]. SS is controlled by different gene classes such as granule bound starch synthase (GBSS), and starch synthases I, II, III, and IV [5,7]. GBSS completely binds the starch granules and is only responsible for amylose synthesis. SSI, SSII, and SSIII are involved in amylopectin elongation [8], while SSIV controls the number of starch granules in the leaves of Arabidopsis [9,10]. The presence of SSIV in thylakoid membranes in Arabidopsis suggests that starch granules are initiated at a specific area of the chloroplast. Exon and intron regions of SSIII and SSIV are highly conserved in Arabidopsis, rice, and wheat but are different from SSI, SSII, and GBSS [11,12]. The Arabidopsisstarch mutant plant (esv1) cannot synthesize or degrade starch at night and was dwarfed [13]. Overexpression of SSIV increases the level of starch accumulated in the leaves of Arabidopsis and potato, which also show higher rates of growth. Overexpression increased starch content in both photosynthetic and sink organs [14,15]. OsSSIVa and OsSSIVb are mainly expressed in endosperm and leaves, respectively. Starch granule synthesis initiation in rice endosperm does not solely depend on OsSSIIIa and OsSSIVb, because suppression of these genes did not stop the granule initiation process. These results are different from Arabidopsis double mutant in which suppression of these two genes totally stopped granule production [16].In wheat, TaSSIV is closely related to TaSSIII according to phylogenetic analysis and these genes share a similar arrangement of exons and introns [7]. The chromosomal location of TaSSIV is on the long arm of homoeologous group 1 chromosome and is syntonic with OsSSIVb located on chromosome 5 [7]. The presence of TaSSIII and TaSSIV on the same chromosome but opposite arms and phylogenetic analysis indicates that the evolutionary histories of these genes are related [17]. TaSSIV-D mutation of wheat through EMS (ethyl methane sulphonate) showed that the chloroplasts containing 0–2 granules increased significantly while the chloroplasts containing 3–4 granules decreased [18].EcoTILLING (Ecotype Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes), is an inexpensive, robust, and reliable allele mining approach. This approach is capable of allele mining and identifying genotypes of novel functional and natural variation of known genes [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. In rice, this technique has been used to characterize five genes of salt tolerance [26]. Similarly, eight genes in tomato related to sucrose synthesis were characterized [27]. In wheat, the EcoTILLLING approach has also been deployed to determine allelic diversity of genes such as kernel hardness genes, Pin a and Pin b [28]. In the future, new cultivars could be explored by EcoTILLING that contain the alleles originating from their wild relatives.Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been widely used in marker assisted selection (MAS). SNPs and deletions/insertions (InDels) are nucleotide variations in natural populations that can be significantly associated with agronomic parameters [29]. Comprehensive SNP analysis of genes of particular interest are helpful for association analysis between allelic variations with phenotypic differences and the subsequent MAS of the associated traits [30]. To date, DNA polymorphisms of TaSSIV have not been systematically surveyed in wheat. Natural polymorphism can be used for further breeding programmes and to understand the function of TaSSIV. There is also a need to know the allelic variation of TaSSIV in A, B, and D genomes.In this study, EcoTILLING was used to detect allelic variation in the targeted region of TaSSIV-A, B, and D genomes in 362 wheat accessions collected from diverse geographical areas of China and Pakistan to identify nucleotide diversity. The developed Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) markers were applied to screen 262 Chinese mini core collection (MCC) and 100 Pakistani wheat accessions for particular nucleotide variation. SNPs were identified with distinguishable haplotypes in the germplasm collection. In addition, association analysis between the haplotypes and phenotypic traits of the MCC was also performed to reveal marker trait associations (MTAs).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material and DNA Extraction
A panel of 362 wheat accessions was used for EcoTILLING. This panel mainly consisted of 262 mini core collection (MCC) accessions from China and 100 accessions originating from Pakistan (spring wheat) (Table S1). MCC represents 70% of the total wheat genetic diversity available in China [4]. MCC accessions were planted at CAAS Luoyang Experimental Station in Henan Province in 2002 and 2005. Morphological data was collected at the maturity stage, for thousand grain weight (TGW) and spike length (SPL) [31].
2.2. DNA Isolation and Molecular Analyses
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from young seedling leaves using the standard CTAB procedure [32]. Extracted gDNA was checked by using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis for quality and quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer.
2.3. Primers Development
The target gene regions with maximum probability for missense variants were predicted using the CODDLE bioinformatics pipeline (http://blocks.fhcrc.org/proweb/). Genomic sequences of the three TaSSIV genes were obtained from the GenBank database (http://www.wheatgenome.org/). Multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences was conducted by Bioedit 7.0. Primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA). Genome-specific primers for TaSSIV-A and TaSSIV-B were designed on the basis of SNPs and/or InDels; primers were already available for TaSSIV-D [18]. Specificity of primers for target genes was tested by PCR amplification in Chinese Spring (CS), Jing411, and nulli-tetrasomic lines of CS. Detailed information for primers is given in Tables S2, S3 and Figure S1.
2.4. EcoTILLING
For EcoTILLING, each accession and Chinese Spring (WT) were pooled in a 1:1 ratio after diluting the samples. PCRs were performed in 10 µL final volumes on 100 ng µL−1 DNA using 0.4 U/reaction of Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Ex TaqTM). The mixture contained a 4:1 ratio of IRD800-labeled to unlabeled reverse primers and 3:2 ratio of IRD700-labeled to unlabeled forward primers. The EcoTILLING method was followed as described in [33]. After the denaturation step, each sample was loaded on the 6.5% polyacrylamide gel with a 96 well comb. The gel images were analyzed using Gel buddy software and polymorphisms were identified.
2.5. Sequencing of Variants
Resultant PCR products were directly sequenced in both directions by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China, to confirm the sequence variations. Identified sequence variants were analyzed by the PARSESNP (http://blocks.fhcrc.org/proweb/) and SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant) (http://sift.jcvi.org/) programs with default parameters [34].
2.6. Development of Functional Markers (FMs) Using KASP
For high-throughput genotyping, KASP primers were developed on the variants of TaSSIV-A, -B, and -D by following standard KASP guidelines (http://www.lgcgenomics.com). The allele-specific primers were developed using the standard FAM (5′ GAAGGTGACCAAGTTCATGCT 3′) and HEX (5′ GAAGGT CGGAGTCAACGGATT 3′) tails with a targeted SNP at the 3′ end. KASP markers were then applied across the entire population. The KASP markers were developed by following standard KASP guidelines [35]. A scatter plot for KASP assays showed clustering of accessions on the X-(FAM) and Y-(HEX) signals. Detailed information for primers is given in Tables S2, S3 and Figure S1.
2.7. Association between SNPs and Agronomic Traits
Descriptive statistics and estimates of variance were conducted using Microsoft Excel 2013. The effect of haplotypes on agronomic traits were analyzed using Student’s t-tests at p < 0.05 (even 0.01).
3. Results
3.1. Natural Variation of TaSSIV in Accessions
Gene structure analysis showed that TaSSIV-A consisted of 13 exons and 12 introns while TaSSIV-B, and TaSSIV-D each consisted of 16 exons and 15 introns. Each gene was exploited in the wheat population for sequence polymorphism by EcoTILLING. A total of 38 putative natural variation sites were identified across the population (Table 1 and Figure 1). Twelve sequence polymorphic sites were identified in the coding region, while 26 were identified in the non-coding region. Out of 38 DNA polymorphisms, 31 were SNPs while seven were InDels. Among the identified sequence polymorphisms, two missense polymorphisms were identified in TaSSIV-A and TaSSIV-B each, while TaSSIV-D possessed three missense polymorphisms. TaSSIV-B and TaSSIV-D also possessed one and three silent polymorphisms, respectively.
Table 1
List of nucleotide polymorphism in TaSSIV with their effects on codons and variation in amino acid.
No.
Gene
Genotype
Allele
Mutation Type
Variation in Amino Acid
1
TaSSIV-A
Laoqiaomai
A1447G
Non-coding
2
Sankecun
T1455G
Non-coding
3
Wenmai-6
C1563T
Non-coding
4
Yangmai-158
A1673T
Non-coding
5
Yangmai-158
C2436T
Missense
R77C
6
Guinong-10
T2073G
Non-coding
6
Zhongzhou-741
A2403C
Missense
I66L
8
Mahuaban
G5081A
Intron
9
Huoliyan
C5952T
Intron
10
Huangshuibai
T6013:
Intron
11
Guinong-11
G2143A
Non-coding
12
TaSSIV-B
Dingxingzhai
C1529T
Missense
S149L
13
Pingyuan-50
C1560T
Silent
F159=
14
Dabaimai
A2234G
Missense
K384R
15
Lumai-1
T3314G
Intron
16
Lumai-1
T3325G
Intron
17
Xinmai-18
A3478ATT
Intron
18
Baipixiaomai
C6107T
Silent
I822=
19
Xiaobaimai
G6329A
Intron
20
Shahkar-95
A2950:
Intron
21
Drawar-97
A2991G
Intron
22
Blue silver
C3457T
Intron
23
Lasani
G4115CTT
Intron
24
Kohistan
C4176T
Intron
25
Marvi
T3268G
Intron
26
TaSSIV-D
Zijuhong
T5904:
Intron
27
Hongchumai
A6168C
Intron
28
Hongmai
G6485:
Intron
29
Hongmai
T6440C
Intron
30
Kabka-3
A3387:
Intron
31
Chumai
C3593G
Silent
G454=
32
Yangmai
C3899G
Silent
V505=
33
Hongpidongmai
T3981A
Missense
S533T
34
FSD-08
C5849T
Intron
35
BWP-6309
G6164T
Intron
36
Manthar
G6070A
Missense
V800I
37
Kohistan-97
A6540G
Missense
T841A
38
Sehar
T4016C
Silent
Y533=
Note: only one accession was listed as a representative due to limited space. “:” Deletion; “=” No change in amino acid.
Figure 1
Location of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TaSSIV-A, TaSSIV-B and TaSSIV-D.
The SIFT computer program predicted that only one sequence polymorphism in TaSSIV-D led to an amino acid change (V → I at 800 aa), which was located in the GT-5 domain and may affect the protein function. All other missense polymorphisms of TaSSIV-A, B, and D were present in coiled regions of protein structure and not in functional domains.
3.2. KASP Marker Development
KASP markers were developed using identified sequence polymorphisms. Among the KASP markers, four markers (KASP-A1673T, KASP-C5952T, KASP-A2403C, and KASP-C2436T) in TaSSIV-A and two markers (KASP-C1560T and KASP-C6107T) in TaSSIV-B had allele frequencies over 5%. These results were consistent with EcoTILLING. All SNPs of TaSSIV-D had allelic frequencies less than 5% and were therefore excluded from further analysis. For KASP-A11673T, KASP-C5952T, KASP-A2403C, and KASP-C2436T (Figure 2a–d) accessions in blue circles have A, C, A, and C alleles while accessions in red circles have T, T, C, and T alleles, respectively, for TaSSIV-A. Similarly, for KASP-C1560T and KASP-C6107T (Figure 2e,f) accessions in blue circles have C allele whereas accessions in red circles have T allele in TaSSIV-B gene (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Scatter plot for KASP assays; showing clustering of accessions on the X-(FAM) and Y-(HEX) axes. Accessions colored blue have the FAM- type allele; accessions colored red have the HEX-type allele; black dots represent the NTC (non-template control). (a–d): TaSSIV-A. (a) KASP-A1673T, (b) KASP-A2403C, (c) KASP-C2436T, (d) KASP-C5952T, (e,f) TaSSIV-B. (e) KASP-C1560T, (f) KASP-C6107T.
3.3. Association Between Haplotypes and Yield-Related Traits
There was a total of 14 haplotypes in TaSSIV-A. The frequency of each haplotype in MCC was different. Frequencies of the three haplotypes of TaSSIV-A, i.e., Hap-1-1A (AATC), Hap-2-1A (ACTT), and Hap-3-1A (ACTC) were more than 5%. The other eleven haplotypes were less than 5%, marking them as rare haplotypes. Three haplotypes of TaSSIV-B i.e., Hap-1-1B (CC), Hap-2-1B (TC), and Hap-3-1B (CT) in the wheat population had frequencies more than 5% (Table 2). Association analysis showed that TaSSIV-A was associated with TGW; Hap-2-1A showed significant difference from the other two haplotypes and had higher TGW. Hap-3-1B was the favored haplotype for SPL and was significantly different from Hap-1-1B and Hap-2-1B (Figure 3). Therefore, these two haplotypes were significantly associated with yield-related traits, which may have potential as functional markers (FMs) to be used in MAS for starch content breeding.
Table 2
Nucleotide polymorphisms and functional marker development of TaSSIV-A and TaSSIV-B.
Gene
Haplotype
Position of Nucleotides
Gene
Haplotype
Position of Nucleotides
TaSSIV-A
1673 nt
2403 nt
2436 nt
5952 nt
TaSSIV-B
1560 nt
6107 nt
Hap-1-1A
A
A
T
C
Hap-1-1B
C
C
Hap-2-1A
A
C
T
T
Hap-2-1B
T
C
Hap-3-1A
A
C
T
C
Hap-3-1B
C
T
Figure 3
Favorable haplotypes and their interaction with phenotype. TGW, thousand grain weight; SPL, spike length; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; Two-year data of 2002 and 2005.
3.4. Geographic Distribution of TaSSIV-A and TaSSIV-B Haplotypes
To determine, whether the favored haplotypes for TaSSIV-A and TaSSIV-B were selected in wheat breeding, we investigated the geographic distribution of TaSSIV-A and B in MCC. On the basis of agro-climatic conditions, China has 10 agro-ecological regions, I to X [36].Regions I–IV are the major wheat producing regions based on production and cultivation area. In landraces, the frequency of the favored haplotype Hap-2-1A for TGW was low and Hap-1-1A was dominant in all major areas. In modern cultivars, the favored haplotype Hap-2-1A frequency was high (more than 50%) in regions I–IV (Figure 4). The frequency of Hap-2-1A was significantly increased from 25% to 50% in region I, 20% to 48% in region II, 11.67% to 33.37% in region III, and 8% to 85.71% in region IV from landraces to modern cultivars, respectively. The results showed that favored haplotypes experienced positive selection in Chinese wheat breeding programs. Similarly, in TaSSIV-B haplotypes, the favored haplotype Hap-3-1B was significantly different from Hap-1-1B and Hap-2-1B for SPL but its frequency was balanced or selectively neutral in landraces and modern wheat cultivars. Therefore, the positive alleles of these haplotypes have the potential to be used in wheat breeding to increase in the grain yield.
Figure 4
Geographic distribution of TaSSIV-A and TaSSIV-B Haplotypes in China. (a,c) Landraces, (b,d) modern cultivars. I, Northern winter wheat region; II, Yellow and Huai River valleys winter wheat region; III, Middle and low Yangtze valleys winter wheat region; IV, Southwestern winter wheat region; V, Southern winter wheat region; VI, Northeastern spring wheat region; VII, Northern spring wheat region; VIII, Northwestern spring wheat region; IX, Qinghai-Tibetan spring-winter wheat region; X, Xinjiang winter-spring wheat region. Pie chart size is directly proportional to number of genotypes.
In Pakistani wheat accessions, geographic distribution was investigated in TaSSIV-A haplotypes. The frequency of Hap-2-1A among five different regions of Pakistan was higher in the Punjab irrigated region (78%) and the Punjab rainfed region (52%). The frequency of this haplotype in Khyber Pakhtonkhwa was 35%. (Figure 5).
Figure 5
TaSSIV-A haplotypes distribution among Pakistani wheat genotypes. I, Punjab rainfed region; II, Punjab irrigated region; III, Sindh region; IV, Balochistan region; V, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region. Pie chart size is directly proportional to number of genotypes.
3.5. Positive Selection of Hap-2-1A in China’s Wheat Breeding Process
On the basis of released time, the wheat population was grouped into six sub-groups, i.e., accessions released before 1951, 1951–1960, 1961–1970, 1971–1980, 1981–1990, and 1991–2001. The frequency of Hap-2-1A continuously increased, suggesting progressive selection (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Favored haplotypes of TaSSIV-A selected over the history of wheat breeding in China.
4. Discussion
Knowledge-based genetic improvement of crop plants is crucial for global food security in the future [21]. Molecular plant breeding uses phenotypic and genetic variations with contemporary tools to develop new varieties with higher productivity and that are resilient to extreme environments [37].The EcoTILLING approach has been used to discover natural genetic variation in different crop plants such as Arabidopsis, wheat, barley, Brassica sp., and rice [20,38,39]. The SSIV gene has been characterized in Arabidopsis, rice, and wheat; however, its allelic variations were not characterized systematically. Our primary goal was to identify natural genetic variation of TaSSIV in wheat and its association with traits contributing to yield. EcoTILLING successfully identified 38 SNPs across three homeologous TaSSIV genes in modern cultivars and landraces from China and Pakistan.Development of high-throughput molecular markers is of utmost importance for use in wheat molecular breeding [40]. Gel-free KASP assays could significantly improve the speed and efficiency of selection in wheat breeding programs. Although EcoTILLING successfully identified all the allelic variation in TaSSIV homeologous genes, it is a laborious and costly method for routine genotyping. To overcome this problem, KASP markers were developed for several SNPs for high-throughput and cost-effective genotyping of these variants. The six KASP assays developed in our study can be routinely used for identification of SNPs in TaSSIV in other germplasm and breeding populations with extremely high accuracy [41].The allelic variation and KASP markers developed to distinguish TaSSIV haplotypes can be instrumental in MAS, which can be utilized in combination with other FMs for TGW and SPL breeding. Wheat A and B sub-genomes have a relatively broader genetic base compared to the D sub-genome. Additionally, non-coding regions also have relatively higher levels of polymorphism compared to coding regions [42]. The absence of significant polymorphism in TaSSIV-D is probably due to the narrow genetic background of the D sub-genome or allele fixation due to an evolution and domestication bottleneck.A haplotype block combining two or more SNPs in strong linkage disequilibrium are more explanatory than bi-allelic SNPs [43]. Beyond bi-allelic SNP variations, haplotype data can capture associations that evade identification by single SNPs [44]. Haplotype-based analyses are still rare in wheat with few exceptions [45,46]. Identification of haplotypes can also capture epistatic interactions between SNPs. Hence haplotype-based approach could increase prediction accuracies [47].The starch synthase family in plants encodes many starch synthesis genes that play essential roles in starch synthesis and ultimately increase yield [48]. There is a strong relationship between starch and grain yield in wheat and maize. Association analysis is a powerful approach to investigate marker trait associations (MTAs) [49]. In the present study, two haplotypes of TaSSIV (Hap-2-1A in TaSSIV-A and Hap-3-1B in TASSIV-B) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with yield-related traits in wheat.It has been demonstrated that grain yield in France [50], Italy [51], the UK, and China [52] has largely been attained by improvements in grain number per square meter with significant change in individual grain weight [53,54]. Accessions possessing haplotype Hap-2-1A had higher TGW while accessions having Hap-3-1B had larger SPL. Yield-related traits of cereal crops are governed by multiple genes and are influenced by environmental factors [55]. Among the reported gene determinants of cereal grain traits, some genes act constitutively under different environments, while others function in specific conditions [56]. In this study, yield-related traits showed significant association with the identified haplotypes, which suggests that use of these haplotypes can be instrumental to improve yield of the wheat crop.In China, the geographical distribution of two haplotypes is also supportive. Varieties bred in regions I to IV usually have bigger grain size and larger spikes, but fewer tillers to evade canopy structures favoring rust epidemics [57]. Region II covers ~40% of the total national wheat area and accounts for ~45% of total wheat production in China [36]. Average TGW of varieties in this region is 42–43 g. From landraces to modern cultivars, positive selection of haplotype Hap-2-1A favored wheat breeding. Regions I, II, and III account for about 64.8% of total national wheat area and greater turnover of wheat cultivars was also reported from these regions [35]. In China, wheat yield increase has largely depended on higher TGW [55]. There was a significant association between haplotype TaSSIV-1A-2 and TGW in MCC (Figure 3). In Northern China, 1.3% genetic gain for TGW has been achieved yearly for three decades with concurrent increases in grains per spike in Yellow and Huai River Valleys winter wheat region [52]. Improvement in TGW and grain weight per spike has also been reported in the Southern China winter wheat region since 1949 [52].Choice of populations plays a critical role to detect MTAs via association analysis. Accessions from Pakistan were also used to evaluate the TaSSIV-A haplotypes in five different geographical regions. In these accessions, the favored haplotype (Hap-2-1A) was selected in major wheat growing regions of Pakistan especially in Punjab regions (rainfed region and irrigated region) (Figure 5). In both populations (China and Pakistan) the frequency of the favored haplotype (Hap-2-1A) was reasonably high, indicating the positive selection during modern wheat breeding. Although both populations have different population structures, unconscious selection of the favored haplotype is likely due to the high linkage disequilibrium of major yield-related genes selected during selection breeding. However, the frequency analysis in wheat cultivars from other regions like Europe, USA, and Australia would be required to draw the conclusion that selection of favored haplotypes of TaSSIV is likely due to the selection of major yield-related genes [35].In conclusion, we have demonstrated that EcoTILLING is an efficient approach for allele mining of wheat candidate genes and KASP is a robust approach to validate SNPs for further analysis. This study identified 38 unique alleles in TaSSIV among 362 wheat accessions collected. Association analysis showed that two haplotypes in TaSSIV were significantly associated with TGW and SPL and these haplotypes can be used in future studies to assess their usefulness as selection criteria for improving these yield-related traits.
Authors: Luca Comai; Kim Young; Bradley J Till; Steven H Reynolds; Elizabeth A Greene; Christine A Codomo; Linda C Enns; Jessica E Johnson; Chris Burtner; Anthony R Odden; Steven Henikoff Journal: Plant J Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Martin A J Parry; Matthew Reynolds; Michael E Salvucci; Christine Raines; P John Andralojc; Xin-Guang Zhu; G Dean Price; Anthony G Condon; Robert T Furbank Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Z Li; G Mouille; B Kosar-Hashemi; S Rahman; B Clarke; K R Gale; R Appels; M K Morell Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Nicolas Szydlowski; Paula Ragel; Sandy Raynaud; M Mercedes Lucas; Isaac Roldán; Manuel Montero; Francisco José Muñoz; Miroslav Ovecka; Abdellatif Bahaji; Véronique Planchot; Javier Pozueta-Romero; Christophe D'Hulst; Angel Mérida Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Andrea Rossi; Zacharias Kontarakis; Claudia Gerri; Hendrik Nolte; Soraya Hölper; Marcus Krüger; Didier Y R Stainier Journal: Nature Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 49.962