| Literature DB >> 31003520 |
Axelle Hoge1, Valentine Tabar2, Anne-Françoise Donneau3, Nadia Dardenne4, Sylvie Degée5, Marie Timmermans6, Michelle Nisolle7, Michèle Guillaume8, Vincenzo Castronovo9.
Abstract
While studies revealed that the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) and their mediators would be able to regulate several biological processes involved into the development of postpartum depression (PPD), evidence from observational studies remains mixed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between maternal erythrocyte n-3 PUFA, measured in early pregnancy, and the risk of PPD. A Belgian cohort of 72 healthy women was screened. Erythrocyte fatty acids were analysed using gas chromatography. PPD was assessed using the Bromley Postnatal Depression Scale by phone interview one year after delivery. We observed a significant negative association between docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) levels and the risk of postpartum depression in the adjusted model (p = 0.034). Higher n-6/n-3 and arachidonic acid (AA)/eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ratios were significantly associated with an increased odds of PPD (p = 0.013 and p = 0.043, respectively). Women with an omega-3 index <5% had a 5-fold increased risk of depressive episode than did those with an omega-3 index ≥5% (OR 5.22 (95%CI 1.24-21.88)). A low n-3 PUFA status, alone and combined with high n-6 PUFA status, in early pregnancy was associated with a greater risk of PPD. Management of maternal n-3 PUFA deficiency can be a simple, safe and cost-effective strategy for the prevention of this major public health issue.Entities:
Keywords: erythrocyte; polyunsaturated fatty acids; postpartum depression; pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31003520 PMCID: PMC6521039 DOI: 10.3390/nu11040876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Flowchart of recruitment process.
Characteristics of the women (n = 71).
| Variables | All | Depressive ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 29.1 ± 5.0 | 29.5 ± 4.6 | 28.9 ± 5.1 | 0.70 |
| Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) class (kg/m²) | 0.29 | |||
| <25 | 47 (66.2) | 9 (52.9) | 38 (70.4) | |
| 25–30 | 20 (28.2) | 6 (35.3) | 14 (25.9) | |
| ≥30 | 4 (5.63) | 2 (11.8) | 2 (3.70) | |
| Gestational age at inclusion (weeks) | 10.6 ± 2.4 | 10.5 ± 2.6 | 10.6 ± 2.4 | 0.97 |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks) | 39.1 ± 1.7 | 39.2 ± 1.7 | 39.0 ± 1.8 | 0.66 |
| Parity |
| |||
| Nulliparous | 31 (43.7) | 5 (29.4) | 26 (48.2) | |
| Primiparous | 26 (36.6) | 5 (29.4) | 21 (38.9) | |
| Multiparous | 14 (19.7) | 7 (41.2) | 7 (13.0) | |
| Nationality | 0.31 | |||
| Belgian | 47 (66.2) | 13 (76.5) | 34 (63.0) | |
| Other | 24 (33.8) | 4 (23.5) | 20 (37.0) | |
| Level of education | 0.63 | |||
| Low | 34 (47.9) | 9 (52.9) | 25 (46.3) | |
| High | 37 (52.1) | 8 (47.1) | 29 (53.7) | |
| Socio-professional occupation |
| |||
| Yes | 40 (56.3) | 6 (35.3) | 34 (63.0) | |
| No | 31 (43.6) | 11 (64.7) | 20 (37.0) | |
| In a relationship | 0.21 | |||
| Yes | 60 (84.5) | 16 (94.1) | 44 (81.5) | |
| No | 11 (15.5) | 1 (5.88) | 10 (18.5) |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or number (%). 1 p-value from Student’s t-test or Chi-square test. Significant p-values (<0.05) are in bold.
Univariate logistic regression model associating postpartum depression (PPD) with potential risk factors. Odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI).
| Variables | PPD | OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, | No, | ||||
| Planned pregnancy | 0.71 | ||||
| Yes | 13 (81.3) | 46 (85.2) | - | - | |
| No | 3 (18.8) | 8 (14.8) | 1.33 | 0.31–5.73 | |
| Adverse life event(s) during pregnancy | 0.49 | ||||
| No | 7 (43.8) | 29 (53.7) | - | - | |
| Yes | 9 (56.3) | 25 (46.3) | 1.49 | 0.49–4.59 | |
| Adverse life event(s) after childbirth |
| ||||
| No | 4 (25.0) | 31 (57.4) | - | - | |
| Yes | 12 (75.0) | 23 (42.6) | 4.04 | 1.15–14.2 | |
| Satisfaction in social support from entourage during pregnancy | 0.52 2 | ||||
| Yes | 16 (100.0) | 50 (92.6) | - | - | |
| No | 0 (0.00) | 4 (7.41) | 0.34 | 0.01–9.35 | |
| Satisfaction in social support from entourage after childbirth | 0.43 2 | ||||
| Yes | 16 (100.0) | 49 (90.7) | - | - | |
| No | 0 (0.00) | 5 (9.3) | 0.27 | 0.01–6.83 | |
| Emotional distress during pregnancy | 0.26 | ||||
| No | 6 (37.5) | 29 (53.7) | - | - | |
| Yes | 10 (62.5) | 25 (46.3) | 1.93 | 0.62–6.07 | |
Data are presented as number (%). PPD: postpartum depression. 1 Significant p-values (<0.05) are in bold. 2 Results obtained from the firth binary logistic.
Logistic regression model associating postpartum depression with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) composition (% of total RBC phospholipid FA).
| Fatty Acids (%) | PPD | Unadjusted Model | Adjusted Model 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, Mean ± SD | No, Mean ± SD | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| ALA | 0.14 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 1.05 (0.25–4.49) | 0.95 3 | 2.31 (0.43–12.5) | 0.33 3 |
| EPA | 0.46 ± 0.26 | 0.58 ± 0.26 | 0.10 (0.00–1.99) | 0.13 | 0.11 (0.00–2.48) | 0.17 |
| DHA | 4.85 ± 1.36 | 5.72 ± 1.34 | 0.55 (0.33–0.93) |
| 0.53 (0.30–0.95) |
|
| Total n-3 PUFA | 5.45 ± 1.52 | 6.43 ± 1.52 | 0.58 (0.35–0.94) |
| 0.57 (0.34–0.98) |
|
| Omega-3 index | 5.31 ± 1.53 | 6.30 ± 1.54 | 0.58 (0.36–0.97) |
| 0.57 (0.34–0.98) |
|
| Total n-6 PUFA | 24.6 ± 1.63 | 23.8 ± 1.36 | 1.51 (1.00–2.26) | 0.05 | 1.55 (0.96–2.51) | 0.07 |
| n-6/n-3 ratio | 4.92 ± 1.60 | 3.91 ± 0.94 | 2.09 (1.24–3.52) |
| 2.31 (1.20–4.45) |
|
| AA/EPA ratio | 39.3 ± 19.4 | 28.8 ± 11.3 | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) |
| 1.05 (1.00–1.11) |
|
PPD: post-partum depression; AA: arachidonic acid; ALA: alpha-linolenic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; n-3 PUFA: omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; n-6 PUFA: omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids; RBC: red blood cells; FA: fatty acids; AA: arachidonic acid; n-6/n-3 ratio = total n-6 PUFA/total n-3 PUFA; 1 Adjusted for parity, socio-professional occupation and adverse life events after childbirth. 2 Significant p-values (<0.05) are in bold. 3 ALA levels were log-transformed to normalise distribution in statistical analyses.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of omega-3 index cut-offs as a prediction for postpartum depression.
Figure 3Distribution of participants by omega-index and postpartum depression status.