Literature DB >> 3099978

Mnemonic correlates of unit activity in the hippocampus.

C G Wible, R L Findling, M Shapiro, E J Lang, S Crane, D S Olton.   

Abstract

The role of the hippocampus in memory processing was examined by recording single unit activity while rats performed two different types of memory tasks. The same apparatus was used for all tasks; it consisted of two goal boxes, side by side, on the end of a runway. One goal box was white, the other was black. Experiment I used a working memory, delayed match-to-sample (DMTS) task. A trial began with a sample phase in which the rat was forced to a goal box containing a reward. The rat was then placed at the beginning of the runway again for the choice phase and allowed to enter either of the two goal boxes. Entering the goal box with the same color as that entered during the sample phase was rewarded. Experiment II used a within-subjects, within-units, design to test rats in two reference memory tasks, a cue task and a spatial task. During the cue task, the rat was rewarded for choosing the same colored goal box on each trial regardless of its spatial location. During the spatial task, the rat was rewarded for choosing the goal box in a specific location on each trial regardless of its color. During all tasks, the location of the goal boxes was changed between trials in a pseudorandom, counterbalanced fashion so that each colored goal box was on the right for half of the trials and on the left for half of the trials. During performance of the DMTS task, activity of most units was correlated with a combination of factors such as color and location, or color and phase. For example, most units showing differential activity in one of the colored goal boxes fired more when that box was in a certain spatial location, or during either the sample or choice phase. During performance of the reference memory tasks, the activity of most units was not correlated with behavior. However, the rate for some units changed between the cue and spatial tasks. When unit activity was correlated with behavior, it was dependent on a combination of dimensions such as color and spatial location. These results demonstrate that units in the hippocampus respond to combinations of stimulus dimensions such as color and spatial location, and to the temporal context necessary to solve a working memory task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3099978     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90604-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  16 in total

1.  Common firing patterns of hippocampal cells in a differential reinforcement of low rates of response schedule.

Authors:  B Young; N McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Dynamic adjustments in prefrontal, hippocampal, and inferior temporal interactions with increasing visual working memory load.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Motivational states activate distinct hippocampal representations to guide goal-directed behaviors.

Authors:  Pamela J Kennedy; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum; Magdalena Sauvage; Norbert Fortin; Robert Komorowski; Paul Lipton
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Acquisition of matching-to-sample performance in rats using visual stimuli on nose keys.

Authors:  I H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Working Memory Performance Correlates with Prefrontal-Hippocampal Theta Interactions but not with Prefrontal Neuron Firing Rates.

Authors:  James M Hyman; Eric A Zilli; Amanda M Paley; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10

8.  Differences in hippocampal neuronal population responses to modifications of an environmental context: evidence for distinct, yet complementary, functions of CA3 and CA1 ensembles.

Authors:  Almira Vazdarjanova; John F Guzowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where.

Authors:  Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Hippocampal-cortical interaction in decision making.

Authors:  Jai Y Yu; Loren M Frank
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.