Sofia Strömbergsson1, Katarina Holm2, Anette Lohmander2,3, Per Östberg2,3. 1. Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, sofia.strombergsson@ki.se. 2. Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Functional Area Speech and Language Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A traditional curricular structure may challenge integration between foundational and clinical sciences in speech and language pathology (SLP) education. This project aimed to increase curriculum integration at a Swedish SLP education programme. METHODS: Learning outcomes in the existent curriculum were copied from their original courses and re-structured with reference to vertical tracks, in order to address them within and across years of study. A content analysis of interviews with teachers and students was conducted for the evaluation of curricular change. RESULTS: Among the changes were earlier introduction to clinical science and revisiting of foundational sciences later in the education. Theme concepts were defined to scaffold horizontal integration, whereas revisited use of documented material was formalized to ensure vertical integration. In evaluation interviews, multiple examples were provided of how the new curriculum was perceived as being more integrated, with horizontal themes and vertical tracks providing structure. Concerns raised highlight the importance of appointing clear responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: The concepts "gaps" and "overlaps" may guide remediation of areas where increased curricular integration is warranted. Serial child observations running through the curriculum may provide a platform for both horizontal and vertical integration. For maintenance of curricular integration, clear responsibilities are needed, stretching across course and semester boundaries. The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: A traditional curricular structure may challenge integration between foundational and clinical sciences in speech and language pathology (SLP) education. This project aimed to increase curriculum integration at a Swedish SLP education programme. METHODS: Learning outcomes in the existent curriculum were copied from their original courses and re-structured with reference to vertical tracks, in order to address them within and across years of study. A content analysis of interviews with teachers and students was conducted for the evaluation of curricular change. RESULTS: Among the changes were earlier introduction to clinical science and revisiting of foundational sciences later in the education. Theme concepts were defined to scaffold horizontal integration, whereas revisited use of documented material was formalized to ensure vertical integration. In evaluation interviews, multiple examples were provided of how the new curriculum was perceived as being more integrated, with horizontal themes and vertical tracks providing structure. Concerns raised highlight the importance of appointing clear responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: The concepts "gaps" and "overlaps" may guide remediation of areas where increased curricular integration is warranted. Serial child observations running through the curriculum may provide a platform for both horizontal and vertical integration. For maintenance of curricular integration, clear responsibilities are needed, stretching across course and semester boundaries. The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Entities:
Keywords:
Education; Linguistic skills; Logopaedics; Speech-language pathology; Undergraduates
Authors: Andrew O'Regan; Aidan Culhane; Colum Dunne; Michael Griffin; Deirdre McGrath; David Meagher; Pat O'Dwyer; Walter Cullen Journal: Educ Prim Care Date: 2013-05