| Literature DB >> 30992039 |
Feng Liang1, Guillaume Emeriaud2, Dilson E Rassier3, Dong Shang1, Ekaterina Gusev1, Sabah N A Hussain1, Michael Sage4, Benjamin Crulli2, Etienne Fortin-Pellerin4, Jean-Paul Praud4, Basil J Petrof5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diaphragm weakness occurs rapidly in adult animals treated with mechanical ventilation (MV), but the effects of MV on the neonatal diaphragm have not been determined. Furthermore, it is unknown whether co-existent lung disease exacerbates ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD). We investigated the impact of MV (mean duration = 7.65 h), either with or without co-existent respiratory failure caused by surfactant deficiency, on the development of VIDD in newborn lambs.Entities:
Keywords: Lung injury; Mechanical ventilation; Neonatal; Surfactant deficiency; Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD)
Year: 2019 PMID: 30992039 PMCID: PMC6469194 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2409-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
Ventilator settings and gas exchange parameters in the two groups of newborn lambs receiving mechanical ventilation
| Respiratory parameters | MV ( | MV+SD ( |
|---|---|---|
| Respiratory rate (bpm) | 60 (59–60) | 53 (47–56)a |
| Tidal volume (ml/kg) | 7.8 (7.7–7.9) | 5.9 (5.7–6.6)a |
| FiO2 (%) | 25 (22–25) | 71 (60–95)a |
| PEEP (cmH2O) | 6.0 (5.3–6.0) | 6.0 (5.3–6.0) |
| Peak inspiratory airway pressure (cmH2O) | 16.0 (15.0–16.0) | 17.0 (14.8–18.5) |
| Arterial pH | 7.33 (7.31–7.37) | 7.26 (7.16–7.28)b |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 63 (52–67) | 97 (92–110)a |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 46 (45–50) | 48 (39–49) |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio | 271 (232–283) | 142 (105–161)a |
| Dynamic compliance (ml/kg/cmH2O) | 0.77 (0.68–0.79) | 0.58 (0.48–0.69)a |
Dynamic compliance = tidal volume/peak inspiratory airway pressure minus PEEP. Data are reported as median (interquartiles) after 5 h of mechanical ventilation
PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, FiO2 fraction of inspired oxygen
ap < 0.01 or bp < 0.05 (rank test)
Fig. 1Inflammatory signaling in mechanically ventilated newborn diaphragms. a Representative immunoblot images of phosphorylated and total STAT3 protein in the diaphragm. b Group mean ratio of phosphorylated to total STAT3 protein in the diaphragm, expressed as fold change relative to CTL. c Group mean transcript levels of IL-6, depicted as fold change relative to CTL group values. *p < 0.05 for CTL (n = 5) versus MV (n = 6) or MV+SD (n = 6)
Fig. 2Proteolysis pathways in mechanically ventilated newborn diaphragms. a Transcript levels of muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligases (Atrogin1, MuRF1) and SIRT1 in the diaphragm. b Transcript levels of autophagy genes LC3B and Gabarapl1, expressed as fold change relative to CTL values. c Representative immunoblot and group mean values for LC3B-I and LC3B-II protein in the diaphragm. *p < 0.05 versus CTL; #p < 0.05 for MV versus MV+SD
Fig. 3Indices of oxidative stress in mechanically ventilated newborn diaphragms. a Representative immunoblot images of carbonyl groups and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) in diaphragm proteins extracted from CTL, MV, and MV+SD groups. Group mean quantification of b carbonyls and c 4-HNE in the diaphragm under the above experimental conditions
Fig. 4Diaphragm muscle fiber phenotype in mechanically ventilated newborn lambs. a Transcript levels of MyHC isoforms in the diaphragm. b Representative immunohistochemical staining for slow type 1 (blue) and fast type 2a (green) MyHC isoforms. c Group mean diaphragm muscle fiber size (Feret’s minimal diameter) for type 1 and type 2a fibers in the three experimental groups. *p < 0.05 versus CTL; #p < 0.05 for MV versus MV+SD
Fig. 5Diaphragm muscle fiber function in mechanically ventilated newborn lambs. a Representative examples of plots of absolute isometric force generation after exposure to calcium by diaphragm myofibrils isolated from CTL, MV, and MV+SD lambs. b Group mean maximal isometric specific force (normalized to cross-sectional area). c Group mean rate of force development (Kact). d Group mean rate of force redevelopment after acute shortening (Ktr). e Group mean rate of relaxation (Krel). *p < 0.05 for CTL (n = 5) versus MV (n = 4) or MV+SD (n = 6)