PURPOSE: Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi. METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdimax) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2-7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0-10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdimax in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4-20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1-21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdimax between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant (p < 0.001). Patients intubated mainly because of a lung pathology exhibited higher EAdi (p < 0.01), with a similar temporal increase. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic description of EAdi evolution in children during their stay in the PICU. In our patient cohort, diaphragm activity was frequently low in conventional ventilation, suggesting that overassistance or oversedation is common in clinical practice. EAdi monitoring appears to be a helpful tool to detect such situations.
PURPOSE: Diaphragm function should be monitored in critically ill patients, as full ventilatory support rapidly induces diaphragm atrophy. Monitoring the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) may help assess the level of diaphragm activity, but such monitoring results are difficult to interpret because reference values are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe EAdi values in critically ill children during a stay in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), from the acute to recovery phases, and to assess the impact of ventilatory support on EAdi. METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal observational study of children requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥24 h. EAdi was recorded using a validated method in the acute phase, before extubation, after extubation, and before PICU discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-five critically ill children were enrolled in the study. Median maximum inspiratory EAdi (EAdimax) during mechanical ventilation was 3.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.2-7.6] μV in the acute phase and 4.8 (IQR 2.0-10.7) μV in the pre-extubation phase. Periods of diaphragm inactivity (with no detectable inspiratory EAdi) were frequent during conventional ventilation, even with a low level of support. EAdimax in spontaneous ventilation was 15.4 (IQR 7.4-20.7) μV shortly after extubation and 12.6 (IQR 8.1-21.3) μV before PICU discharge. The difference in EAdimax between mechanical ventilation and post-extubation periods was significant (p < 0.001). Patients intubated mainly because of a lung pathology exhibited higher EAdi (p < 0.01), with a similar temporal increase. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic description of EAdi evolution in children during their stay in the PICU. In our patient cohort, diaphragm activity was frequently low in conventional ventilation, suggesting that overassistance or oversedation is common in clinical practice. EAdi monitoring appears to be a helpful tool to detect such situations.
Authors: Davide Colombo; Gianmaria Cammarota; Moreno Alemani; Luca Carenzo; Federico Lorenzo Barra; Rosanna Vaschetto; Arthur S Slutsky; Francesco Della Corte; Paolo Navalesi Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Valérie Payen; Philippe Jouvet; Jacques Lacroix; Thierry Ducruet; France Gauvin Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Rosanna Vaschetto; Gianmaria Cammarota; Davide Colombo; Federico Longhini; Francesca Grossi; Andrea Giovanniello; Francesco Della Corte; Paolo Navalesi Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Tro Sekayan; Justin Hotz; Rutger C Flink; Gerrard F Rafferty; Narayan Iyer; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Justin Hotz; Rica Morzov; Rutger C Flink; Asvari Kamerkar; Marie LaFortune; Gerrard F Rafferty; Patrick A Ross; Christopher J L Newth Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-06-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Justin C Hotz; Dinnel Bornstein; Kristen Kohler; Erin Smith; Anil Suresh; Margaret Klein; Anoopindar Bhalla; Christopher J Newth; Robinder G Khemani Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 3.971
Authors: Kelby E Knox; Leonardo Nava-Guerra; Justin C Hotz; Christopher J L Newth; Michael C K Khoo; Robinder G Khemani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 9.296