Literature DB >> 30981425

Measuring clinically relevant knee motion with a self-calibrated wearable sensor.

Todd J Hullfish1, Feini Qu2, Brendan D Stoeckl1, Peter M Gebhard1, Robert L Mauck2, Josh R Baxter3.   

Abstract

Low-cost sensors provide a unique opportunity to continuously monitor patient progress during rehabilitation; however, these sensors have yet to demonstrate the fidelity and lack the calibration paradigms necessary to be viable tools for clinical research. The purpose of this study was to validate a low-cost wearable sensor that accurately measured peak knee extension during clinical exercises and needed no additional equipment for calibration. Sagittal plane knee motion was quantified using a 9-axis motion sensor and directly compared to motion capture data. The motion sensor measured the field strength of a strong earth magnet secured to the distal femur, which was correlated with knee angle during a simple calibration process. Peak knee motions and kinematic patterns were compared with motion capture data using paired t-tests and cross correlation, respectively. Peak extension values during seated knee extensions were accurate within 5 degrees across all subjects (root mean square error: 2.6 degrees, P = 0.29). Knee flexion during gait strongly correlated (0.84 ≤ rxy ≤ 0.99) with motion capture measurements but demonstrated peak flexion errors of 10 degrees. In this study, we present a low-cost sensor (≈$ 35 US) that accurately determines knee extension angle following a calibration procedure that did not require any other equipment. Our findings demonstrate that this sensor paradigm is a feasible tool to monitor patient progress throughout physical therapy. However, dynamic motions that are associated with soft-tissue artifact may limit the accuracy of this type of wearable sensor.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inertial measurement unit; Low-cost sensor; Motion capture; Wearable sensors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30981425      PMCID: PMC6587970          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  P E Scranton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision.

Authors:  Jane Kim; Charles L Nelson; Paul A Lotke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects.

Authors:  Rita Stagni; Silvia Fantozzi; Angelo Cappello; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.

Authors:  J A Zeni; J G Richards; J S Higginson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement.

Authors:  Scott L Delp; Frank C Anderson; Allison S Arnold; Peter Loan; Ayman Habib; Chand T John; Eran Guendelman; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Joint kinematics estimate using wearable inertial and magnetic sensing modules.

Authors:  Pietro Picerno; Andrea Cereatti; Aurelio Cappozzo
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Non-invasive assessment of soft-tissue artifact and its effect on knee joint kinematics during functional activity.

Authors:  Massoud Akbarshahi; Anthony G Schache; Justin W Fernandez; Richard Baker; Scott Banks; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Flexion contracture persists if the contracture is more than 15° at 3 months after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroaki Mitsuyasu; Shuichi Matsuda; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Shingo Fukagawa; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement.

Authors:  Roy D Crowninshield; Aaron G Rosenberg; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Inertial sensor motion analysis of gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: differentiating knee patients from healthy controls.

Authors:  S A A N Bolink; S N van Laarhoven; M Lipperts; I C Heyligers; B Grimm
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.833

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fusion of Wearable Kinetic and Kinematic Sensors to Estimate Triceps Surae Work during Outdoor Locomotion on Slopes.

Authors:  Sara E Harper; Dylan G Schmitz; Peter G Adamczyk; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  A Nonproprietary Movement Analysis System (MoJoXlab) Based on Wearable Inertial Measurement Units Applicable to Healthy Participants and Those With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Across a Range of Complex Tasks: Validation Study.

Authors:  Riasat Islam; Mohamed Bennasar; Kevin Nicholas; Kate Button; Simon Holland; Paul Mulholland; Blaine Price; Mohammad Al-Amri
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  Wearable Tendon Kinetics.

Authors:  Sara E Harper; Rebecca A Roembke; John D Zunker; Darryl G Thelen; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.