Literature DB >> 594094

Drug discrimination and generalization in pigeons.

M R Leberer, S C Fowler.   

Abstract

In a three-key operant conditioning situation six pigeons were trained to select the response key which was associated with each of three drug treatment conditions: d-amphetamine (2 mg/kg), pentobarbital (5 mg/kg), and saline. Thus, the drug state served as a discriminative stimulus for food reinforcement. After 20 sessions of discrimination training in each of the three conditions, more than 90% of the responses were correctly emitted in the presence of the appropriate drug or saline stimulus. Acquisition of the discrimination progressed at approximately equal rates for the three treatments. Subsequent to discrimination training, generalization gradients were obtained for several doses of the training drugs and for dose ranges of cocaine, morphine, and methocarbamol. The pigeons responded to morphine by choosing the key paired with pentobarbital during training; further, cocaine administration resulted in choice of the amphetamine key. However, metocarbamol, over the doses used, produced responding more characteristic of saline than of the other training drugs. The data suggest that a three-key operant discrimination procedure using pigeons provides a sensitive method for investigating the stimulus properties of relatively low doses of behaviorally relevant drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 594094     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(77)90219-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  10 in total

1.  Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  D E McMillan; W C Hardwick; Mi Li
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discriminative effects of combinations of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol and pentobarbital in pigeons.

Authors:  T U Järbe; G C Ohlin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-06-21       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Drug discrimination procedures: differential characteristics of the drug A vs drug B and the drug A vs drug B vs no drug cases.

Authors:  M D Swedberg; T U Järbe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations.

Authors:  J M Witkin; R B Carter; L A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Prediction and Prevention of Prescription Drug Abuse: Role of Preclinical Assessment of Substance Abuse Liability.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; Timothy W Lefever; Scott P Novak; Bruce E Blough; Jenny L Wiley
Journal:  Methods Rep RTI Press       Date:  2013-07

6.  Effects of prior saline-morphine discrimination by pigeons on three-way discrimination including two morphine doses.

Authors:  D V Gauvin; A M Young
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Role of training conditions in discrimination of central nervous system stimulants by rats.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; G D D'Mello
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Differentiation between the stimulus effects of (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide and lisuride using a three-choice, drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  P M Callahan; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in rhesus monkeys: tests of stimulus generalization and duration of action.

Authors:  G Winger; S Herling
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons.

Authors:  S Herling; R J Valentino; G D Winger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.