Literature DB >> 30976579

Adherence to European Polypectomy Guidelines: Retrospective Experience from a Tertiary Irish Hospital.

Vikrant Parihar1, Julia Sopheno-Falco1, Pardeep Maheshwari1, Neil O'Moran1, Vivien Graziadei1, Aishling O'Grady Walshe1, Orla O'Dwyer1, Lakshman Kumar1, Sean Fennessy1, Niall Breslin1, Barbara M Ryan1, Deirdre McNamara1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The European guidelines for colorectal cancer screening state that snare resection should remove any polyps ≥5 mm. This study aimed to investigate if these new guidelines are adhered to in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study consists of patients who underwent colonoscopies in Tallaght Hospital, Dublin (AMNCH), between 2012 and 2015. The size of the polyp, the method of removal, and the subspecialty and grade of the endoscopists were all recorded.
RESULTS: 6,000 colonoscopies were reviewed and 687 (12.5%) of these patients were found to have polyps. In 655 (95%) colonoscopies, the caecum was positively identified. In all, 371 (54%) of the polyps detected were < 5 mm; resection via forceps was carried out in n405 cases (59%). Overall, 16% (n = 45) of the polyps > 5 mm underwent resection with forceps, showing that the new European guidelines are not being tightly adhered to.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found an 84% compliance with polypectomy resection guidelines which is an improvement on previous studies. However, endoscopist grade significantly affected compliance and may reflect overall competency, highlighting the need for specific training in snare polypectomy techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence rates; Polypectomy; Snares

Year:  2018        PMID: 30976579      PMCID: PMC6422123          DOI: 10.1159/000494351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors        ISSN: 2296-3774


  11 in total

1.  A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Soo-kyung Park; Bong Min Ko; Jae Pil Han; Su Jin Hong; Moon Sung Lee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Management of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R J C Steele; C Pox; E J Kuipers; G Minoli; R Lambert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline.

Authors:  Monika Ferlitsch; Alan Moss; Cesare Hassan; Pradeep Bhandari; Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Gregorios Paspatis; Rodrigo Jover; Cord Langner; Maxime Bronzwaer; Kumanan Nalankilli; Paul Fockens; Rawi Hazzan; Ian M Gralnek; Michael Gschwantler; Elisabeth Waldmann; Philip Jeschek; Daniela Penz; Denis Heresbach; Leon Moons; Arnaud Lemmers; Konstantina Paraskeva; Juergen Pohl; Thierry Ponchon; Jaroslaw Regula; Alessandro Repici; Matthew D Rutter; Nicholas G Burgess; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl; Amitabh Srivastava; Steve P Bensen; Peter Anderson; Richard I Rothstein; Stuart R Gordon; L Campbell Levy; Arifa Toor; Todd A Mackenzie; Thomas Rosch; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Quality of polyp resection during colonoscopy: are we achieving polyp clearance?

Authors:  Shanglei Liu; Samuel B Ho; Mary Lee Krinsky
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Bo-In Lee; Hwang Choi; Sun-Young Jun; Eun Su Park; Jae Myung Park; In-Seok Lee; Byung-Wook Kim; Sang Woo Kim; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Forceps versus snare polypectomies in colorectal cancer screening: are we adhering to the guidelines?

Authors:  Martha Britto-Arias; Elisabeth Waldmann; Philip Jeschek; Irina Gessl; Daniela Sallinger; Christina Bannert; Michael Weber; Michael Trauner; Werner Weiss; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 8.  Cancer genome landscapes.

Authors:  Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Victor E Velculescu; Shibin Zhou; Luis A Diaz; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Michal F Kaminski; Magnus Løberg; Ann G Zauber; Jaroslaw Regula; Ernst J Kuipers; Miguel A Hernán; Eleanor McFadden; Annike Sunde; Mette Kalager; Evelien Dekker; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Kjetil Garborg; Maciej Rupinski; Manon C W Spaander; Marek Bugajski; Ole Høie; Tryggvi Stefansson; Geir Hoff; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Role of the cold biopsy technique in diminutive and small colonic polyp removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dany Raad; Priyam Tripathi; Gregory Cooper; Yngve Falck-Ytter
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dye-based chromoendoscopy following polypectomy reduces incomplete polyp resection.

Authors:  Neil R O'Morain; Mohd I Syafiq; Ammar Shahin; Barbara Ryan; Stephen Crowther; Deirdre McNamara
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.