Literature DB >> 23022496

Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study.

Heiko Pohl1, Amitabh Srivastava, Steve P Bensen, Peter Anderson, Richard I Rothstein, Stuart R Gordon, L Campbell Levy, Arifa Toor, Todd A Mackenzie, Thomas Rosch, Douglas J Robertson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although the adenoma detection rate is used as a measure of colonoscopy quality, there are limited data on the quality of endoscopic resection of detected adenomas. We determined the rate of incompletely resected neoplastic polyps in clinical practice.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study on 1427 patients who underwent colonoscopy at 2 medical centers and had at least 1 nonpedunculated polyp (5-20 mm). After polyp removal was considered complete macroscopically, biopsies were obtained from the resection margin. The main outcome was the percentage of incompletely resected neoplastic polyps (incomplete resection rate [IRR]) determined by the presence of neoplastic tissue in post-polypectomy biopsies. Associations between IRR and polyp size, morphology, histology, and endoscopist were assessed by regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 346 neoplastic polyps (269 patients; 84.0% men; mean age, 63.4 years) removed by 11 gastroenterologists, 10.1% were incompletely resected. IRR increased with polyp size and was significantly higher for large (10-20 mm) than small (5-9 mm) neoplastic polyps (17.3% vs 6.8%; relative risk = 2.1), and for sessile serrated adenomas/polyps than for conventional adenomas (31.0% vs 7.2%; relative risk = 3.7). The IRR for endoscopists with at least 20 polypectomies ranged from 6.5% to 22.7%; there was a 3.4-fold difference between the highest and lowest IRR after adjusting for size and sessile serrated histology.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoplastic polyps are often incompletely resected, and the rate of incomplete resection varies broadly among endoscopists. Incomplete resection might contribute to the development of colon cancers after colonoscopy (interval cancers). Efforts are needed to ensure complete resection, especially of larger lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01224444.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23022496     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  181 in total

1.  Management and risk factors for incomplete resection associated with jumbo forceps polypectomy for diminutive colorectal polyps: a single-institution retrospective study.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shinji Nagata; Kenjiro Shigita; Yutaro Ogawa; Hirosato Tamari; Taiki Aoyama; Akira Fukumoto; Shinichi Mukai; Mayumi Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  FIT testing: an overview.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Taft Bhuket; James Allison
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

3.  Does Colon Polyp Surveillance Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  David Lieberman; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Protective association of colonoscopy against proximal and distal colon cancer and patterns in interval cancer.

Authors:  Amandeep K Shergill; Erin E Conners; Kenneth R McQuaid; Sara Epstein; James C Ryan; Janak N Shah; John Inadomi; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroyasu Iishi; Shin-ei Kudo; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Masahiro Igarashi; Yusuke Saitoh; Yuji Inoue; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Takashi Hisabe; Osamu Tsuruta; Yasushi Sano; Hiroo Yamano; Seiji Shimizu; Naohisa Yahagi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisashi Nakamura; Takahiro Fujii; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal adenomas: Only for expert centers?

Authors:  Mario Anders; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Endoscopic Management of Large (≥2 cm) Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Impact of Polyp Morphology on Outcomes.

Authors:  Seon Hee Lim; John M Levenick; Abraham Mathew; Matthew T Moyer; Charles E Dye; Thomas J McGarrity
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Diagnosis, epidemiology and management of serrated polyposis syndrome: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Fotios S Fousekis; Ioannis V Mitselos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.