Literature DB >> 26115462

Forceps versus snare polypectomies in colorectal cancer screening: are we adhering to the guidelines?

Martha Britto-Arias1, Elisabeth Waldmann1, Philip Jeschek1, Irina Gessl1, Daniela Sallinger1, Christina Bannert2, Michael Weber2, Michael Trauner1, Werner Weiss2, Arnulf Ferlitsch1, Monika Ferlitsch1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening recommend snare resection for polyps > 5 mm. The aim of this study was to investigate polypectomy technique according to lesion size and shape, and to assess adherence of endoscopists enrolled in the national quality assurance program to the European guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cohort study included screening colonoscopies performed between 2007 and 2013 within a quality assurance program in Austria. Resection technique was analyzed according to lesion characteristics and endoscopy facility (private practices, hospitals, outpatient clinics) before publication of the EU guidelines (2007 - 2010) and adherence to the guidelines after publication (2011 - 2013). All surveillance colonoscopies and examinations with missing data were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 128 969 screening colonoscopies performed by 278 endoscopy units were included. The polyp detection rate was 39.6 % (n = 47 797) and 95.6 % of polyps were resected. Of polyps ≥ 5 mm, 46.0 % were resected using forceps and were therefore not treated in accordance with the guidelines. Forceps polypectomy of lesions 5 - 10 mm and > 10 mm decreased significantly in hospitals after implementation of the guidelines (both P < 0.0001). In private practices, there was no difference in forceps usage for polyps of 5 - 10 mm (P = 0.41) before and after the guidelines, and for polyps > 10 mm forceps usage even increased (P < 0.0001). Endoscopists' forceps removal rates for polyps ≥ 5 mm correlated significantly with respective adenoma detection rates (P = 0.0007, r p  - 0.187) and cecal intubation rates (P = 0.0001, r p  - 0.303). Among endoscopists in private practices, internists had slightly lower forceps removal rates for polyps ≥ 5 mm than surgeons, both before (47.2 % vs. 50.7 %; P = 0.014) and after publication of the guidelines (51.9 % vs. 53.5 %; P = 0.161).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the importance of the European guidelines. The inclusion of adequate resection technique as a quality indicator in colorectal cancer screening programs is recommended. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26115462     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  5 in total

Review 1.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Pushing the Limit: How to Get the Most Out of Cold Snares.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Adherence to European Polypectomy Guidelines: Retrospective Experience from a Tertiary Irish Hospital.

Authors:  Vikrant Parihar; Julia Sopheno-Falco; Pardeep Maheshwari; Neil O'Moran; Vivien Graziadei; Aishling O'Grady Walshe; Orla O'Dwyer; Lakshman Kumar; Sean Fennessy; Niall Breslin; Barbara M Ryan; Deirdre McNamara
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-11-22

Review 4.  Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review.

Authors:  Florien M Kruse; Niek W Stadhouders; Eddy M Adang; Stef Groenewoud; Patrick P T Jeurissen
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2018-03-02

5.  ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 - 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru.

Authors:  Julio F León Moreno
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-11-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.