Literature DB >> 11165526

Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types.

T Kammer1, S Beck, A Thielscher, U Laubis-Herrmann, H Topka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the stimulation effectiveness of different magnetic stimulator devices with respect to pulse waveform and current direction in the motor cortex.
METHODS: In 8 normal subjects we determined motor thresholds of transcranial magnetic stimulation in a small hand muscle. We used focal figure-of-eight coils of 3 common stimulators (Dantec Magpro, Magstim 200 and Magstim Rapid) and systematically varied current direction (postero-anterior versus antero-posterior, perpendicular to the central sulcus) as well as pulse waveform (monophasic versus biphasic). The coil position was kept constant with a stereotactic positioning device.
RESULTS: Motor thresholds varied consistently with changing stimulus parameters, despite substantial interindividual variability. By normalizing the values with respect to the square root of the energy of the capacitors in the different stimulators, we found a homogeneous pattern of threshold variations. The normalized Magstim threshold values were consistently higher than the normalized Dantec thresholds by a factor of 1.3. For both stimulator types the monophasic pulse was more effective if the current passed the motor cortex in a postero-anterior direction rather than antero-posterior. In contrast, the biphasic pulse was weaker with the first upstroke in the postero-anterior direction. We calculated mean factors for transforming the intensity values of a particular configuration into that of another configuration by normalizing the different threshold values of each individual subject to his lowest threshold value.
CONCLUSIONS: Our transformation factors allow us to compare stimulation intensities from studies using different devices and pulse forms. The effectiveness of stimulation as a function of waveform and current direction follows the same pattern as in a peripheral nerve preparation (J Physiol (Lond) 513 (1998) 571).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11165526     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00513-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  92 in total

1.  Neural summation in human motor cortex by subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Fow-Sen Choa; Ann Summerfelt; Malle A Tagamets; Laura M Rowland; Peter Kochunov; Paul Shepard; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects on the right motor hand-area excitability produced by low-frequency rTMS over human contralateral homologous cortex.

Authors:  Francesca Gilio; Vincenzo Rizzo; Hartwig R Siebner; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system.

Authors:  Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Dennis Wenzel; James Luckemeyer; John Roby; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets.

Authors:  Janine D Bijsterbosch; Anthony T Barker; Kwang-Hyuk Lee; P W R Woodruff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  An rTMS study into self-face recognition using video-morphing technique.

Authors:  Christine Heinisch; Hubert R Dinse; Martin Tegenthoff; Georg Juckel; Martin Brüne
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Cortical neuron activation induced by electromagnetic stimulation: a quantitative analysis via modelling and simulation.

Authors:  Tiecheng Wu; Jie Fan; Kim Seng Lee; Xiaoping Li
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Test-retest reliability of short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Inhibitory circuits and the nature of their interactions in the human motor cortex a pharmacological TMS study.

Authors:  J Florian; M Müller-Dahlhaus; Yali Liu; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  TMS evoked N100 reflects local GABA and glutamate balance.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Fow-Sen Choa; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.