Literature DB >> 30972464

In vivo kinematics and ligamentous function of the knee during weight-bearing flexion: an investigation on mid-range flexion of the knee.

Zhitao Rao1,2,3, Chaochao Zhou1,3, Willem A Kernkamp1, Timothy E Foster1,4, Hany S Bedair1,4,3, Guoan Li5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the in vivo femoral condyle motion and synergistic function of the ACL/PCL along the weight-bearing knee flexion.
METHODS: Twenty-two healthy human knees were imaged using a combined MRI and dual fluoroscopic imaging technique during a single-legged lunge (0°-120°). The medial and lateral femoral condyle translation and rotation (measured using geometric center axis-GCA), and the length changes of the ACL/PCL were analyzed at: low (0°-30°), mid-range (30°-90°) and high (90°-120°) flexion of the knee.
RESULTS: At low flexion (0°-30°), the strains of the ACL and the posterior-medial bundle of the PCL decreased. The medial condyle showed anterior translation and lateral condyle posterior translation, accompanied with a sharp increase in external GCA rotation (internal tibial rotation). As the knee continued flexion in mid-range (30°-90°), both ACL and PCL were slack (with negative strain values). The medial condyle moved anteriorly before 60° of flexion and then posteriorly, accompanied with a slow increase of GCA rotation. As the knee flexed in high flexion (90°-120°), only the PCL had increasingly strains. Both medial and lateral condyles moved posteriorly with a rather constant GCA rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: The ACL and PCL were shown to play a reciprocal and synergistic role during knee flexion. Mid-range reciprocal anterior-posterior femoral translation or laxity corresponds to minimal constraints of the ACL and PCL, and may represent a natural motion character of normal knees. The data could be used as a valuable reference when managing the mid-range "instability" and enhancing high flexion capability of the knee after TKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; High flexion; In vivo knee kinematics; Mid-range instability; PCL; TKA

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30972464      PMCID: PMC6786938          DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05499-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  46 in total

1.  The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis.

Authors:  Louis E Defrate; Ramprasad Papannagari; Thomas J Gill; Jeremy M Moses; Neil P Pathare; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  In situ forces of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in high knee flexion: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Shay Zayontz; Ephrat Most; Louis E DeFrate; Jeremy F Suggs; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  In vivo gap analysis in various knee flexion angles during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jung-Ro Yoon; Hyeon-Il Jeong; Kwang-Jun Oh; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Can we define envelope of laxity during navigated knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  K M Ghosh; A P Blain; L Longstaff; S Rushton; A A Amis; D J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  In vivo determination of cam-post engagement in fixed and mobile-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Sumesh M Zingde; Filip Leszko; Adrija Sharma; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Richard D Komistek; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  In vivo knee kinematics during stair and deep flexion activities in patients with bicruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuji Kuroyanagi; Shang Mu; Satoshi Hamai; William J Robb; Scott A Banks
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Midflexion Laxity After Implantation Was Influenced by the Joint Gap Balance Before Implantation in TKA.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Shigeru Nakagawa; Ryo Sugama; Tessyu Ikawa; Takahiro Noguchi; Masashi Hirakawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Post-cam mechanics and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic in vitro analysis of eight posterior-stabilized total knee designs.

Authors:  N Arnout; L Vanlommel; J Vanlommel; J P Luyckx; L Labey; B Innocenti; J Victor; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Kinematics of medial osteoarthritic knees before and after posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Angela L Moynihan; Fang Liu; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Effect of ACL sacrifice, retention, or substitution on kinematics after TKA.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Does contemporary bicruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty restore the native knee kinematics? A descriptive literature review.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Yun Peng; Shuai An; Hany Bedair; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Ligament deformation patterns of the craniocervical junction during head axial rotation tracked by biplane fluoroscopes.

Authors:  Chaochao Zhou; Runsheng Guo; Cong Wang; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Yan Yu; Wei Wang; Guoan Li; Thomas Cha
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.034

3.  Predicting the Effect of Localized ACL Damage on Neighbor Ligament Mechanics via Finite Element Modeling.

Authors:  Alexander Knapp; Lakiesha N Williams
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Biomechanical consequences of anterior root detachment of the lateral meniscus and its reinsertion.

Authors:  Alejandro Espejo-Reina; Maria Prado-Novoa; Alejandro Espejo-Baena; Alejandro Peña-Trabalon; Ana Perez-Blanca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  UTE-T2* versus conventional T2* mapping to assess posterior cruciate ligament ultrastructure and integrity-an in-situ study.

Authors:  Lena Marie Wilms; Karl Ludger Radke; David Latz; Thomas Andreas Thiel; Miriam Frenken; Benedikt Kamp; Timm Joachim Filler; Armin Michael Nagel; Anja Müller-Lutz; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-08

6.  PCL insufficient patients with increased translational and rotational passive knee joint laxity have no increased range of anterior-posterior and rotational tibiofemoral motion during level walking.

Authors:  Stephan Oehme; Philippe Moewis; Heide Boeth; Benjamin Bartek; Annika Lippert; Christoph von Tycowicz; Rainald Ehrig; Georg N Duda; Tobias Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  In vivo length change of ligaments of normal knees during dynamic high flexion.

Authors:  Kenichi Kono; Shoji Konda; Takaharu Yamazaki; Sakae Tanaka; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Tetsuya Tomita
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Cruciate ligament force of knees following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is larger than the preoperative value.

Authors:  Kenichi Kono; Hiroshi Inui; Tetsuya Tomita; Darryl D D'Lima; Takaharu Yamazaki; Shoji Konda; Shuji Taketomi; Ryota Yamagami; Kohei Kawaguchi; Shin Sameshima; Tomofumi Kage; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.