Literature DB >> 10734423

Statistical models predicting embryo survival to term in cattle after embryo transfer.

W H McMillan1.   

Abstract

Embryo survival to term in recipient cattle is highly variable. We examined calving data in the published literature to determine whether a model of binomial independence or a model which includes an embryo (e) and recipient term (r), adequately explain observed embryo survival rates following attempts to induce twin calving using transfer of two embryos. To achieve this we examined 32 published papers which provided us with 47 sets of data concerning 4560 recipients with either 0, 1 or 2 calves born. In each set of data, the observed embryo survival rate to term (p) (number of calves born/number of embryos) was calculated and the expected number of recipients with either 0, 1 or 2 calves born was determined, assuming a binomial distribution. Parameters for the second model were estimated using maximum-likelihood procedures. The model of embryo independence was rejected in 85% of the sets of data, suggesting that factors other than the embryo are important sources of variation in embryo survival or loss. The proposed e and r model of embryo survival adequately describes the published data in recipients receiving either single or twin embryos. In general, only 50-70% of embryos and recipients are sufficiently competent to result in a calving. Variation among laboratories producing either in vitro or in vivo derived embryos was due to variation in recipient and not embryo competence. It is argued that e rather than observed embryo survival rate, and r rather than observed pregnancy rate, should be used to compare differences among embryo treatments and groups of recipients, respectively. Acceptance of this proposition should permit faster progress in identifying the biology of superior embryos and recipients, which is a prerequisite to improving embryo survival rate in cattle. Collectively, the published data are not consistent with a model of embryo independence, and that a model of embryo survival to term which recognises recipient as well as embryo contributions to embryo survival may be more appropriate in cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10734423     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00207-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

Review 1.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle.

Authors:  Alan D Ealy; Lydia K Wooldridge; Sarah R McCoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Regulation of present and future development by maternal regulatory signals acting on the embryo during the morula to blastocyst transition - insights from the cow.

Authors:  Peter J Hansen; Paula Tríbulo
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Molecular fingerprint of female bovine embryos produced in vitro with high competence to establish and maintain pregnancy†.

Authors:  A M Zolini; J Block; M B Rabaglino; P Tríbulo; M Hoelker; G Rincon; J J Bromfield; P J Hansen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Identification of Beef Heifers with Superior Uterine Capacity for Pregnancy.

Authors:  Thomas W Geary; Gregory W Burns; Joao G N Moraes; James I Moss; Anna C Denicol; Kyle B Dobbs; M Sofia Ortega; Peter J Hansen; Michael E Wehrman; Holly Neibergs; Eleanore O'Neil; Susanta Behura; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Loci and pathways associated with uterine capacity for pregnancy and fertility in beef cattle.

Authors:  Mahesh Neupane; Thomas W Geary; Jennifer N Kiser; Gregory W Burns; Peter J Hansen; Thomas E Spencer; Holly L Neibergs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exacerbated conceptus signaling does not favor establishment of pregnancy in beef cattle.

Authors:  T Martins; M Sponchiado; O A Ojeda-Rojas; A M Gonella-Diaza; E O S Batista; B O Cardoso; C C Rocha; A C Basso; M Binelli
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12-07

7.  Effects of fertility on gene expression and function of the bovine endometrium.

Authors:  Megan A Minten; Todd R Bilby; Ralph G S Bruno; Carolyn C Allen; Crystal A Madsen; Zeping Wang; Jason E Sawyer; Ahmed Tibary; Holly L Neibergs; Thomas W Geary; Stefan Bauersachs; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metabolomic prediction of pregnancy viability in superovulated cattle embryos and recipients with fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marta Muñoz; Asli Uyar; Eva Correia; Claire Ponsart; Catherine Guyader-Joly; Daniel Martínez-Bello; Brigitte Marquant-Le Guienne; Alfonso Fernandez-Gonzalez; Carmen Díez; Jose Nestor Caamaño; Beatriz Trigal; Patrice Humblot; Susana Carrocera; David Martin; Emre Seli; Enrique Gomez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The incompletely fulfilled promise of embryo transfer in cattle-why aren't pregnancy rates greater and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Peter J Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.