Literature DB >> 10735051

Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring.

A M van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw1, E Mullaart, A P de Roos, J S Merton, J H den Daas, B Kemp, L de Ruigh.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of in vitro production (IVP) of bovine and sheep pre-implantation embryos, increased birth weights and other deviations of IVP calves and lambs compared with AI or MOET offspring have been reported. Study 1 of the present paper, a comparison between AI, MOET and IVP (co-culture/serum) calves with respect to calf and calving characteristics in large-scale field conditions, confirms these reports. In addition, it is shown that MOET calves tend towards higher birth weights and have significantly longer gestations and more difficult calvings than AI calves. It is presently unknown if the effect of IVP is also observed later in life. In this paper, data on reproduction characteristics of bovine IVP co-culture/serum offspring are presented. Semen production--and non return data of one year old IVP bulls and superovulation-, AI- and OPU/IVP results of one year old IVP heifers are compared with those of one year old AI and MOET animals producing semen or embryos in the same time period. So far, there are no indications that the use of IVP is reflected in deviate reproduction characteristics of bovine IVP offspring. It has been suggested that use of co-culture cells and serum during in vitro culture of bovine (and sheep) embryos may partially explain the increased birth weights and other deviations of bovine and sheep IVP offspring. Deletion of these factors in semi-defined culture media, e.g. Synthetic Oviductal Fluid (SOF), could result in more normal offspring. Study 2 investigates this hypothesis in both field conditions (Study 2a, comparing AI, IVP co-culture/serum and IVP SOF calves) and in semi-standardized conditions (Study 2b, comparing MOET, IVP co-culture/serum and IVP SOF calves at one herd). In Study 2a, although IVP SOF calves showed (non-significant) shorter gestations, easier calvings and lower percentages of perinatal mortality and congenital malformations than IVP co-culture calves, birth weights were not decreased. In Study 2b however, the difference between IVP co-culture and IVP SOF calves in birth weight and ease of calving was significant (P < 0.05), IVP SOF calves resembling MOET calves more. IVP calves differed significantly from MOET calves with respect to several physiological parameters, such as blood oxygen saturation level, heart beat frequency and some measures of the heart. In addition, in Study 2b, recipients receiving an IVP SOF embryo showed a more regular return to estrus than those receiving an IVP co-culture embryo. From Study 2 it can be concluded that using a semi-defined medium for in vitro culture (SOF) may improve characteristics of IVP calves born.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735051     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(99)00259-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  16 in total

Review 1.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: Post-transfer consequences of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle.

Authors:  Alan D Ealy; Lydia K Wooldridge; Sarah R McCoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Embryo development, fetal growth and postnatal phenotype of eGFP lambs generated by lentiviral transgenesis.

Authors:  M Crispo; M Vilariño; P C dos Santos-Neto; R Núñez-Olivera; F Cuadro; N Barrera; A P Mulet; T H Nguyen; I Anegón; A Menchaca
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Overgrowth Syndrome.

Authors:  Yahan Li; Callum G Donnelly; Rocío Melissa Rivera
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Alternariol disturbs oocyte maturation and preimplantation development.

Authors:  Eric J Schoevers; Regiane R Santos; Bernard A J Roelen
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.833

5.  Zinc supplementation during in vitro embryo culture increases inner cell mass and total cell numbers in bovine blastocysts1.

Authors:  Lydia K Wooldridge; Madison E Nardi; Alan D Ealy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Epigenetic disorders and altered gene expression after use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Rodrigo Urrego; Nélida Rodriguez-Osorio; Heiner Niemann
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Transcriptional regulators TRIM28, SETDB1, and TP53 are aberrantly expressed in porcine embryos produced by in vitro fertilization in comparison to in vivo- and somatic-cell nuclear transfer-derived embryos.

Authors:  Jennifer Hamm; Kim Tessanne; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Lipid profile of bovine grade-1 blastocysts produced either in vivo or in vitro before and after slow freezing process.

Authors:  Sarah Janati Idrissi; Daniel Le Bourhis; Antoine Lefevre; Patrick Emond; Laurene Le Berre; Olivier Desnoës; Thierry Joly; Samuel Buff; Virginie Maillard; Laurent Schibler; Pascal Salvetti; Sebastien Elis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  No peri- and postnatal effects on calves born after transfer of in vitro produced embryos vitrified by the open pulled straw (OPS) method.

Authors:  H Jacobsen; P Holm; M Schmidt; B Avery; T Greve; H Callesen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Metabolomic prediction of pregnancy viability in superovulated cattle embryos and recipients with fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marta Muñoz; Asli Uyar; Eva Correia; Claire Ponsart; Catherine Guyader-Joly; Daniel Martínez-Bello; Brigitte Marquant-Le Guienne; Alfonso Fernandez-Gonzalez; Carmen Díez; Jose Nestor Caamaño; Beatriz Trigal; Patrice Humblot; Susana Carrocera; David Martin; Emre Seli; Enrique Gomez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.