| Literature DB >> 30967152 |
S Pucci1, C Greggi2,3, C Polidoro4, M C Piro5, M Celi2,3, M Feola2,3, E Gasbarra2,3, R Iundusi2,3, F Mastrangeli2,3, G Novelli4, A Orlandi4, U Tarantino2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeting new molecular pathways leading to Osteoporosis (OP) and Osteoarthritis (OA) is a hot topic for drug discovery. Clusterin (CLU) is a glycoprotein involved in inflammation, proliferation, cell death, neoplastic disease, Alzheimer disease and aging. The present study focuses on the expression and the role of CLU in influencing the decrease of muscle mass and fiber senescence in OP-OA condition.Entities:
Keywords: Clusterin (CLU); Muscle waist; Osteoarthritis; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis marker; Sarcopenia
Year: 2019 PMID: 30967152 PMCID: PMC6457035 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1868-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Main characteristics of OP and OA patients
| OP | OA | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 80.58 ± 6.3 years | 67.63 ± 8 years |
| BMI | 24.56 ± 4.6 | 27.32 ± 4.4 |
| Menopause age | 42.89 ± 1.3 | 43.68 ± 1.4 |
| T-score (L1–L4) | − 2.8 ± 0.7 | − 0.75 ± 0.5 |
| T-score (femoral neck) | − 3 ± 0.6 | − 0.67 ± 0.11 |
| HHS | – | 47.26 ± 5 |
| K–L score | 0–1 | 3/4 |
Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis
| Antibody | Characteristics | Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| IHC | ||
| Anti-IL6 | Mouse monoclonal, R&D Systems | 1:20 |
| Anti-Cluβ | Goat polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology | 1:100 |
| Anti-acetyl histone H4 | Rabbit polyclonal, Upstate | 1:75 |
| Anti-myosin slow | Mouse monoclonal, Sigma-Aldrich | 1:100 |
Fig. 5Effect of CLU silencing on OP and OA myoblasts: a RT-PCR analysis of CLU expression in OA and OP myoblasts transfected with CLU siRNA. The efficiency of CLU silencing was confirmed by RT-PCR. The transfection determined a strong down-regulation of CLU expression both in OA and in OP cells (p < 0.01). b Effect of CLU silencing on OP and OA myoblasts proliferation. Cells were seeded and 24 h after seeding cells were transfected with CLU siRNA. CLU siRNA transfection determined an increase of proliferation only in OP myoblasts (siRNA vs scramble: p < 0.05); conversely, in OA myoblasts we noticed a decrease of proliferation 72 h after transfection (siRNA vs scramble: p < 0.05). (**p < 0.01; *p < 0.05)
Sequences of primers used for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR
| Gene | Primer sequences | T annealing (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| CLU | Sense: 5′-GTGCAATGAGACCATGATGG-3′ | 55 |
| sCLU | Sense: 5′-ATTCTCATCGCTTTGGAAGG-3′ | 58 |
| TGM2 | Sense: 5′-GAGGAGCTGGTCTTAGAGAGG-3 ´ | 62 |
| β2-microglobulin | Sense: 5′-CTGGAACGGTGAAGGTGACA-3′ | 60 |
| GAPDH | Sense: 5′-ACGGATTTGGTCGTATTGG-3′ | 60 |
Primary antibodies used for immunocytochemistry (IHC) analysis
| Antibody | Characteristics | Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| ICC | ||
| Anti-Cluβ | Goat polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology | 1:100 |
| Anti-NFKB | Mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology | 1:100 |
| Anti-acetyl histone H4 | Rabbit polyclonal, Upstate | 1:300 |
| Anti-CX3CR1 | Rabbit polyclonal, Mo Bi Tec Molecular Biologische Technologie | 1:150 |
| Anti-MYOG | Rabbit monoclonal, AbCam | 1:200 |
Fig. 1Histomorphometry and IL6 expression analysis in muscle tissues of OP and OA patients: a Ematoxilin–eosin (H&E), myosin slow and IL6 staining of muscle tissues from OP and OA patients; b percentage of type I and II muscle fibers in OP and OA tissues. This observation supports the best quality of OA muscle as compared to OP (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 2Acetyl histone H4 and CLU expression in OP and OA muscle tissue and myoblast isolated from the same patients: acetyl histone positivity determined by IHC in OP (a) and OA (b) muscle tissues. A strong immunostaining was observed in 45% of nuclei of OP tissues (p < 0.001) indicating the active DNA transcription in the attempt to repair muscle damage. On the contrary only 1% of the nuclei of OA tissues were positive. Immunostaining of CLU was performed both in muscle tissue and in isolated myoblasts of OP (c–e) and OA (d–f) patients (arrows indicate CLU positivity in degenerated fibers of OP muscle tissue). qRT-PCR analysis of sCLU expression was performed in OP-OA muscle tissues (g) and in OP-OA isolated myoblasts (h). The IHC, ICC and qRT-PCR analysis showed a strong CLU expression in OP muscle tissue and isolated myoblasts (*** p < 0.001; * p < 0.5)
Fig. 3Effect of recombinant CLU on OP and OA myoblasts: a effect of CLU conditioning on OP and OA myoblasts proliferation. Cells were seeded and 24 h after seeding recombinant CLU was added. Only OP myoblasts showed a decrease of proliferation after 6 days of treatment (CLU vs NT: p < 0.001) (NT: untreated; CLU: treated with recombinant CLU). b ICC analysis of NFKB expression in untreated and CLU treated OP and OA myoblasts. CLU conditioning determined a decrease of positive nuclei for NFKB expression, only in OP myoblasts (CLU vs NT: p < 0.001). Nuclei are indicated by arrows; respectively, positive nuclei for staining in NT cells and negative nuclei in CLU treated cells. c ICC analysis of acetyl histone H4 expression in untreated and CLU treated OP and OA myoblasts. In this case, CLU conditioning determined a significant increase of histone H4 acetylation levels in OP treated myoblasts (CLU vs NT: p < 0.05). No significant modulation occurred in OA cells. Nuclei are indicated by arrows; respectively, weakly positive nuclei for staining in NT cells and highly positive nuclei in CLU treated cells. (***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01)
Fig. 4MYOG expression in untreated and CLU treated OP and OA myoblasts: An increase of positive nuclei for MYOG expression was observed in OP myoblasts treated for 6 days with CLU (CLU vs NT: p < 0.001). In OA myoblasts, we noticed an increase of MYOG expression only in the cytoplasm, as inactive form, after 6 days of treatment (CLU vs NT: p < 0.01). Nuclei are indicated by arrows; respectively, negative nuclei for staining in NT cells and positive nuclei in CLU treated cells. (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01)
Fig. 6RT-PCR analysis of TGM2 expression and ICC analysis of acetyl histone H4 and CX3CR1 in OP and OA myoblasts transfected with CLU siRNA: a RT-PCR analysis of TGM2 expression. CLU silencing determined an increase of TGM2 expression only in OP myoblasts (siRNA vs scramble: p < 0.05); no modulation occurred in OA myoblasts. b ICC analysis of acetyl histone H4 in OP and OA myoblasts transfected with scramble and CLU siRNA. CLU silencing determined a strong down-regulation of positive nuclei for acetyl histone H4 expression only in OP myoblasts (siRNA vs scramble: p < 0.01); no significant modulation occurred in OA myoblasts. Nuclei are indicated by arrows; respectively, positive nuclei for staining in Scramble cells and negative nuclei in CLU siRNA treated cells. c ICC analysis of CX3CR1 in OP and OA myoblasts transfected with scramble and CLU siRNA. In this case, CLU silencing determined CX3CR1 cytoplasmic expression down-regulation in OP myoblasts (siRNA vs scramble: p < 0.05) and an increase of CX3CR1 cytoplasmic expression in OA myoblasts (siRNA vs scramble: p < 0.01). (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01)