| Literature DB >> 30966075 |
Jinyu Han1,2, Dandan Zhao3, Dan Li4, Xiaohua Wang5,6, Zheng Jin7, Kai Zhao8,9.
Abstract
Nanotechnology plays a significant role in drug development. As carriers, polymeric nanoparticles can deliver vaccine antigens, proteins, and drugs to the desired site of action. Polymeric nanoparticles with lower cytotoxicity can protect the delivered antigens or drugs from degradation under unfavorable conditions via a mucosal administration route; further, the uptake of nanoparticles by antigen-presenting cells can increase and induce potent immune responses. Additionally, nanomaterials are widely used in vaccine delivery systems because nanomaterials can make the vaccine antigen long-acting. This review focuses on some biodegradable polymer materials such as natural polymeric nanomaterials, chemically synthesized polymer materials, and biosynthesized polymeric materials, and points out the advantages and the direction of research on degradable polymeric materials. The application and future perspectives of polymeric materials as delivery carriers and vaccine adjuvants in the field of drugs and vaccines are presented. With the increase of knowledge and fundamental understandings of polymer-based nanomaterials, means of integrating some other attractive properties, such as slow release, target delivery, and alternative administration methods and delivery pathways are feasible. Polymer-based nanomaterials have great potential for the development of novel vaccines and drug systems for certain needs, including single-dose and needle-free deliveries of vaccine antigens and drugs in the future.Entities:
Keywords: delivery carriers; drugs; nanoparticles; polymer-based nanomaterials; vaccine adjuvants; vaccines
Year: 2018 PMID: 30966075 PMCID: PMC6415012 DOI: 10.3390/polym10010031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Classification, application areas, advantages, and disadvantages of polymer-based nanomaterials.
| Classification | Materials | Application Areas | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural polymeric material | Chitosan | Hemostasis material, medical dressing, hydrogel, drug delivery carrier, gene transfer [ | Biocompatibility, antimicrobial, innocuous, easily degradable, adsorbability, film formation [ | Poor spinnability, poor strength, low water-solubility [ |
| Starch | Hemostasis material, tissue-engineered scaffold, drug delivery carrier, bone repair material [ | Extensive sources, low price, degradation products safe and non-toxic, non-antigenic [ | Poor mechanical properties, resistance to water, poor blocking performance [ | |
| Alginate | Pharmaceutical excipient, pepcid complete, medical dressing [ | Hypotoxicity, biocompatibility, suppresses tumor growth, enhances immunity [ | Bad biodegradability, cell attachment poor [ | |
| Cellulose | Pharmaceutical adjuvant [ | Extensive sources, low price [ | Rare adverse reactions [ | |
| Biosynthesis material | Poly β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) | Drug-delivery carrier, tissue engineering material [ | Biodegradable, safe, non-toxic, good physical and chemical properties [ | High crystallinity, bad thermal stability [ |
| Chemosynthes material (Copolymer) | Polylactic (PLA) | Anti-adhesion materials, patch, drug-delivery carrier, bone-fixing device, suture, tissue-engineered scaffold [ | Biocompatibility, good mechanical properties, safe, non-toxic [ | Poor toughness, degradation speed slow, hydrophobicity, lack of reactive side chain groups [ |
| Polyurethane | Excipients, medical bandage [ | Low cost, rich resource, good mechanical properties [ | Degradation speed slow [ | |
| Poly(lactic-glycolic acid) (PLGA) | Absorbable suture, drug delivery, bone screw fixation, tissue repair [ | Controllable biodegradability, biocompatibility [ | Higher cost, drug-loading capacity and stability can be improved [ | |
| Polymethyl methacrylate resin (PMMA) | Bone-fixation materials, dental materials, artificial crystal [ | Easy operation, good biocompatibility | Monomer has cytotoxicity, easy oxidation |
Figure 1Characteristics of chitosan/triphenyl phosphate nanoparticles considered in this review: their inherent biological properties and ability to incorporate many bioactive species within them. Reprinted from Reference [54].
Figure 2Various types of nanoparticles as mucosal vaccines delivery candidates. Reprinted from Reference [63].
Figure 3Immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody content in serum (A); tears (B); tracheal fluid (C); and bile (D) of specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens immunized with PBS i.m., blank CS/PLGA NPs i.m., blank CS/PLGA NPs i.n., pVAX I-optiF i.m., pFDNA-CS/PLGA-NPs i.m., and pFDNA-CS/PLGA-NPs i.n. Values are means ± SD (n = 5). Reprinted from Reference [69].