Literature DB >> 30962754

Prognostic Value of Combined Tumor Marker and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Manabu Yamamoto1, Hiroaki Saito1, Chihiro Uejima1, Akimitsu Tanio1, Yoichiro Tada1, Tomoyuki Matsunaga1, Teruhisa Sakamoto1, Soichiro Honjo1, Keigo Ashida1, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nutritional status is strongly associated with prognosis in cancer patients. Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a nutritional marker based on serum albumin, cholesterol, and total lymphocyte count. We investigated the prognostic significance of a combination of the tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CONUT score (T-CONUT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
METHODS: A total of 522 patients who underwent surgery for CRC at our hospital were retrospectively enrolled in this study.
RESULTS: Patients were divided into groups based on the results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis as follows: CONUThigh (CONUT score ≥ 3) and CONUTlow (CONUT score < 3), and CEAlow (< 5 ng/mL) and CEAhigh (≥ 5 ng/mL). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients in the CONUTlow and CONUThigh groups were 76.0% and 53.9%, respectively (P < 0.0001), and in the CEAlow and CEAhigh groups were 80.7% and 47.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Regarding T-CONUT, the 5-year OS rates of patients with CEAlow/CONUTlow, CEAlow/CONUThigh, CEAhigh/CONUTlow, and CEAhigh/CONUThigh were 84.7%, 69%, 55.3%, and 36.1%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified T-CONUT score as an independent prognostic indicator in CRC patients.
CONCLUSION: T-CONUT may be a useful tool for predicting prognosis in CRC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controlling Nutritional Status score; carcinoembryonic antigen; colorectal cancer; prognosis

Year:  2019        PMID: 30962754      PMCID: PMC6437416     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  34 in total

1.  CONUT: a tool for controlling nutritional status. First validation in a hospital population.

Authors:  J Ignacio de Ulíbarri; A González-Madroño; N G P de Villar; P González; B González; A Mancha; F Rodríguez; G Fernández
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  Are pretreatment serum albumin and cholesterol levels prognostic tools in patients with colorectal carcinoma?

Authors:  Omer Cengiz; Belma Kocer; Süleyman Sürmeli; Mary-Jo Santicky; Atilla Soran
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2006-05-29

3.  Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and albumin in predicting survival in patients with colon and rectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Teeranut Boonpipattanapong; Siripong Chewatanakornkul
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of enteral nutritional supplements postoperatively in malnourished surgical patients.

Authors:  A H Beattie; A T Prach; J P Baxter; C R Pennington
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Increased intratumor Valpha24-positive natural killer T cells: a prognostic factor for primary colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Tachibana; Hisashi Onodera; Tatsuaki Tsuruyama; Akira Mori; Satoshi Nagayama; Hiroshi Hiai; Masayuki Imamura
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  C C Compton; L P Fielding; L J Burgart; B Conley; H S Cooper; S R Hamilton; M E Hammond; D E Henson; R V Hutter; R B Nagle; M L Nielsen; D J Sargent; C R Taylor; M Welton; C Willett
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Jessica L Burrows; Sadie L Dahlk; Pankaj G Vashi; James F Grutsch; Sara Hoffman; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jérôme Galon; Anne Costes; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Amos Kirilovsky; Bernhard Mlecnik; Christine Lagorce-Pagès; Marie Tosolini; Matthieu Camus; Anne Berger; Philippe Wind; Franck Zinzindohoué; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Franck Pagès
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer.

Authors:  J Bauer; S Capra; M Ferguson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery.

Authors:  Hülya Sungurtekin; Uğur Sungurtekin; Canan Balci; Mehmet Zencir; Ergün Erdem
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a prognostic factor for obstructive colorectal cancer patients received stenting as a bridge to curative surgery.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Sato; Masaya Oikawa; Tetsuya Kakita; Takaho Okada; Tomoya Abe; Takashi Yazawa; Haruyuki Tsuchiya; Naoya Akazawa; Masaki Sato; Tetsuya Ohira; Yoshihiro Harada; Haruka Okano; Kei Ito; Takashi Tsuchiya
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of nutritional and immunological scoring systems predicting prognosis in T1-2N0 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Guangzhe Pian; Seung Yeop Oh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The prognostic value of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Jin Qian; Jing Wang; Feng Cheng; Hong-Feng Guo; Jun Xia; Xin Zhou
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a New Indicator of Prognosis in Patients With Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Is Superior to NLR and PNI: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ankang Wang; Zhenxing He; Peng Cong; Yueyu Qu; Tao Hu; Yu Cai; Bo Sun; Hao Chen; Wenguang Fu; Yong Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Prognostic Value of Combination of Controlling Nutritional Status and Tumor Marker in Patients with Radical Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Keru Ma; Hao Wang; Xiangyu Jiang; Chengyuan Fang; Jianqun Ma
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Predictive value of CONUT score combined with serum CA199 levels in postoperative survival of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ankang Wang; Bo Sun; Min Wang; Hao Shi; Zhiwei Huang; Tao He; Qiu Li; Jiaqi Deng; Wenguang Fu; Yu Jiang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of CEA and CA19-9 in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Leilani Lakemeyer; Silvia Sander; Mathias Wittau; Doris Henne-Bruns; Marko Kornmann; Johannes Lemke
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2021-03-17

8.  Is CONUT score a prognostic index in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma?

Authors:  Gülsüm Akgün Çağlıyan; Sibel Hacıoğlu; Başak Ünver Koluman; Kadir İlkkılıç; Rukiye Nar; Mehmet Nuri Başer; Aslı Bozdemir; Hande Şenol; Nilay Şen Türk; Veysel Erol; Onurcan Yılıdırım; Ömer Çağlıyan; Nil Güler
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.