Literature DB >> 34622317

Comparison of nutritional and immunological scoring systems predicting prognosis in T1-2N0 colorectal cancer.

Guangzhe Pian1,2,3, Seung Yeop Oh4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that the new nutritional and immunological status scoring systems of the Naples prognostic score (NPS), controlling nutritional status score (CONUT), and the older prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are independent predictors in colorectal cancer. This study compares the prognostic value of NPS, CONUT, and PNI in T1-2N0 colorectal cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 305 consecutive stage I (T1-2N0M0) colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery from January 2010 to December 2015 at our hospital. The NPS results were divided into 3 groups (0, 1, and 2 groups), and the PNI and CONUT results were divided into 2 groups (low and high groups).
RESULTS: The patients with low PNI had worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those with high PNI (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that PNI was independently associated with OS and DFS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), but NPS and CONUT results were not.
CONCLUSION: The PNI is an independent predictor in stage I colorectal cancer, but NPS and CONUT results are not.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Controlling nutritional status score; Naples prognostic score; Prognostic nutritional index; T1-2N0M0

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34622317     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04043-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  25 in total

1.  Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  G P Buzby; J L Mullen; D C Matthews; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Mustafa A Arain; Yi-Jen Chen; Kristen K Ciombor; Stacey Cohen; Harry S Cooper; Dustin Deming; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Jean L Grem; Andrew Gunn; Sarah Hoffe; Joleen Hubbard; Steven Hunt; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Wells A Messersmith; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Eric D Miller; Mary F Mulcahy; Steven Nurkin; Michael J Overman; Aparna Parikh; Hitendra Patel; Katrina Pedersen; Leonard Saltz; Charles Schneider; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Alyse Johnson-Chilla; Lisa A Gurski
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization.

Authors:  Robert L Camp; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Nutrition, inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Federico Pietrocola; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Naples Prognostic Score, Based on Nutritional and Inflammatory Status, is an Independent Predictor of Long-term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Gennaro Galizia; Eva Lieto; Annamaria Auricchio; Francesca Cardella; Andrea Mabilia; Vlasta Podzemny; Paolo Castellano; Michele Orditura; Vincenzo Napolitano
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Impact of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index on postoperative and survival outcomes in colorectal cancer patients who underwent primary tumor resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guangwei Sun; Yalun Li; Yangjie Peng; Dapeng Lu; Fuqiang Zhang; Xueyang Cui; Qingyue Zhang; Zhuang Li
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kosei Takagi; Stefan Buettner; Jan N M Ijzermans
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Alan P Venook; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Lynette Cederquist; Yi-Jen Chen; Kristen K Ciombor; Stacey Cohen; Harry S Cooper; Dustin Deming; Paul F Engstrom; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Jean L Grem; Axel Grothey; Howard S Hochster; Sarah Hoffe; Steven Hunt; Ahmed Kamel; Natalie Kirilcuk; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Wells A Messersmith; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Eric D Miller; Mary F Mulcahy; James D Murphy; Steven Nurkin; Leonard Saltz; Sunil Sharma; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena M Stoffel; Eden Stotsky-Himelfarb; Christopher G Willett; Evan Wuthrick; Kristina M Gregory; Deborah A Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Impact of the Preoperative Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score on the Survival after Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhito Iseki; Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Hiroshi Ohtani; Kenji Sugano; Tetsuro Ikeya; Kazuya Muguruma; Hiroaki Tanaka; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Changes in Nutritional Status Impact Immune Cell Metabolism and Function.

Authors:  Yazan Alwarawrah; Kaitlin Kiernan; Nancie J MacIver
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.