J Bauer1, S Capra, M Ferguson. 1. The Wesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia, and Centre for Public Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. DESIGN: An observational study assessing the nutritional status of patients with cancer. SETTING: Oncology ward of a private tertiary Australian hospital. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one cancer patients aged 18-92 y. INTERVENTION: Scored PG-SGA questionnaire, comparison of scored PG-SGA with subjective global assessment (SGA), sensitivity, specificity. RESULTS: Some 24% (17) of 71 patients were well nourished, 59% (42) of patients were moderately or suspected of being malnourished and 17% (12) of patients were severely malnourished according to subjective global assessment (SGA). The PG-SGA score had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 82% at predicting SGA classification. There was a significant difference in the median PG-SGA scores for each of the SGA classifications (P<0.001), with the severely malnourished patients having the highest scores. Re-admission within 30 days of discharge was significantly different between SGA groups (P=0.037). The mortality rate within 30 days of discharge was not significantly different between SGA groups (P=0.305). The median length of stay of well nourished patients (SGA A) was significantly lower than that of the malnourished (SGA B+C) patients (P=0.024). CONCLUSION: The scored PG-SGA is an easy to use nutrition assessment tool that allows quick identification and prioritisation of malnutrition in hospitalised patients with cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. DESIGN: An observational study assessing the nutritional status of patients with cancer. SETTING: Oncology ward of a private tertiary Australian hospital. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one cancerpatients aged 18-92 y. INTERVENTION: Scored PG-SGA questionnaire, comparison of scored PG-SGA with subjective global assessment (SGA), sensitivity, specificity. RESULTS: Some 24% (17) of 71 patients were well nourished, 59% (42) of patients were moderately or suspected of being malnourished and 17% (12) of patients were severely malnourished according to subjective global assessment (SGA). The PG-SGA score had a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 82% at predicting SGA classification. There was a significant difference in the median PG-SGA scores for each of the SGA classifications (P<0.001), with the severely malnourished patients having the highest scores. Re-admission within 30 days of discharge was significantly different between SGA groups (P=0.037). The mortality rate within 30 days of discharge was not significantly different between SGA groups (P=0.305). The median length of stay of well nourished patients (SGA A) was significantly lower than that of the malnourished (SGA B+C) patients (P=0.024). CONCLUSION: The scored PG-SGA is an easy to use nutrition assessment tool that allows quick identification and prioritisation of malnutrition in hospitalised patients with cancer.
Authors: Ralph Simanek; Michael Wuensch; Roland Edlinger; Bernhard Hammerl-Ferrari; Ludwig Kramer; Klaus Geissler Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: C W Bassim; H Fassil; J W Mays; D Edwards; K Baird; S M Steinberg; K M Williams; E W Cowen; S A Mitchell; K Cole; T Taylor; D Avila; D Zhang; D Pulanic; L Grkovic; D Fowler; R E Gress; S Z Pavletic Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: B Laquente; A Calsina-Berna; A Carmona-Bayonas; P Jiménez-Fonseca; I Peiró; A Carrato Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Amro Mohamed Sedky El-Ghammaz; Rima Ben Matoug; Maha Elzimaity; Nevine Mostafa Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.603