| Literature DB >> 30960559 |
Krzysztof Moraczewski1, Magdalena Stepczyńska2, Rafał Malinowski3, Tomasz Karasiewicz4, Bartłomiej Jagodziński5, Piotr Rytlewski6.
Abstract
In this study, natural extracts of plant origin were used as anti-aging compounds of biodegradable polymers. Coffee (0.5⁻10 wt%), cocoa, or cinnamon extracts were added to the polylactide matrix. The obtained materials were subjected to an accelerated aging process (720, 1440, or 2160 h) at 45 °C and 70% relative humidity under continuous UV radiation. The effectiveness of the tested extracts was compared to a commercially available anti-aging compound, 2 wt% of butylated hydroxytoluene. Visual evaluation, scanning electron microscopy, melt flow rate, thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, tensile strength, and impact tensile tests were performed. We show that the use of smaller amounts of tested extracts is particularly advantageous, which do not adversely affect the properties of polylactide-based materials at low contents. At the same time, their effectiveness in stabilizing tested properties during the accelerated aging process is mostly comparable to or greater than the reference compound.Entities:
Keywords: accelerated aging; plant extracts; polylactide; polyphenols
Year: 2019 PMID: 30960559 PMCID: PMC6523449 DOI: 10.3390/polym11040575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Photos of selected samples before and after the aging process.
The test results of melt flow rate (MFR).
| Extract Content [wt%] | MFR [g/10 min] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aging Time [h] | |||||
| 0 | 720 | 1440 | 2160 | ||
|
| - | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 5.7 ± 0.7 | 21.5 ± 1.0 | 42.5 ± 1.6 |
|
| 0.5 | 18.5 ± 5.1 | 24.7 ± 6.9 | 51.8 ± 5.3 | 117.9 ± 6.3 |
| 1 | 37.2 ± 4.0 | 40.9 ± 10.4 | 85.0 ± 20.5 | 138.3 ± 22.0 | |
| 3 | 51.9 ± 2.3 | 60.1 ± 11.3 | 99.6 ± 12.7 | 202.1 ± 33.3 | |
| 5 | 61.5 ± 5.0 | 61.9 ± 9.14 | 121.7 ± 15.2 | 156.7 ± 16.0 | |
| 10 | 71.9 ± 7.0 | 73.5 ± 21.4 | 122.9 ± 26.1 | 177.2 ± 26.6 | |
|
| 0.5 | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 7.9 ± 1.1 | 8.9 ± 0.6 | 16.3 ± 3.1 |
| 1 | 6.7 ± 1.4 | 9.4 ± 2.0 | 15.0 ± 1.5 | 15.7 ± 1.5 | |
| 3 | 11.2 ± 3.5 | 17.6 ± 3.1 | 27.9 ± 5.0 | 27.8 ± 3.9 | |
| 5 | 13.8 ± 3.6 | 22.8 ± 6.0 | 33.8 ± 8.0 | 33.0 ± 8.9 | |
| 10 | 19.9 ± 5.1 | 33.7 ± 5.4 | 33.5 ± 6.8 | 48.3 ± 7.8 | |
|
| 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 9.9 ± 2.8 | 14.2 ± 1.4 | 38.7 ± 2.9 |
| 1 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 8.4 ± 1.7 | 11.1 ± 1.5 | 25.5 ± 1.3 | |
| 3 | 5.3 ± 1.2 | 15.2 ± 3.4 | 14.3 ± 2.8 | 32.1 ± 2.9 | |
| 5 | 7.4 ± 1.9 | 15.4 ± 4.2 | 22.1 ± 4.6 | 39.3 ± 7.9 | |
| 10 | 8.6 ± 1.3 | 22.7 ± 3.5 | 27.5 ± 3.1 | 43.4 ± 4.2 | |
|
| - | 4.7 ± 0.6 | 8.6 ± 1.1 | 17.8 ± 2.2 | 36.3 ± 3.2 |
Figure 2Changes in the melt flow rate (MFR) of selected samples as a function of aging time.
Thermogravimetric test results.
| Extract Content [wt%] | T5% [°C] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aging Time [h] | |||||
| 0 | 720 | 1440 | 2160 | ||
| P | - | 320.6 | 300.7 | 289.9 | 279.3 |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 297.8 | 288.6 | 285.5 | 266.9 |
| 1 | 273.5 | 275.0 | 282.4 | 287.1 | |
| 3 | 249.7 | 258.6 | 253.6 | 263.9 | |
| 5 | 245.8 | 249.5 | 251.3 | 251.9 | |
| 10 | 240.42 | 243.9 | 241.1 | 239.0 | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 308.9 | 306.0 | 286.4 | 281.7 |
| 1 | 303.2 | 307.8 | 300.3 | 296.6 | |
| 3 | 295.7 | 301.3 | 294.9 | 282.7 | |
| 5 | 283.3 | 291.0 | 286.5 | 282.9 | |
| 10 | 279.6 | 280.3 | 275.4 | 276.5 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 312.62 | 298.4 | 298.0 | 299.0 |
| 1 | 316.0 | 320.7 | 320.7 | 310 | |
| 3 | 309.27 | 308.6 | 315.6 | 302.3 | |
| 5 | 305.8 | 301.2 | 303.1 | 302.4 | |
| 10 | 277.1 | 301.8 | 296.7 | 289.6 | |
| R | - | 291.3 | 299.1 | 295.1 | 289.5 |
Figure 3Changes in the temperature of 5% of mass loss (T5%) of selected samples as a function of aging time.
Results of differential scanning calorimetry test.
| Extract Content [wt%] | Aging Time [h] | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 720 | 1440 | 2160 | ||||||
| Tg1 [°C] | Tg2 [°C] | Tg1 [°C] | Tg2 [°C] | Tg1 [°C] | Tg2 [°C] | Tg1 [°C] | Tg2 [°C] | ||
| P | - | 62.0 | 60.1 | 61.4 | 57.8 | 60.3 | 57.0 | 59.3 | 55.5 |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 61.0 | 59.8 | 60.1 | 59.4 | 59.7 | 58.9 | 62.4 | 58.7 |
| 1 | 61.2 | 59.9 | 60.4 | 59.4 | 59.7 | 58.8 | 61.8 | 57.9 | |
| 3 | 59.9 | 59.1 | 59.9 | 58.8 | 58.2 | 57.9 | 61.1 | 56.9 | |
| 5 | 59.6 | 58.5 | 60.2 | 58.4 | 58.5 | 58.0 | 60.9 | 56.9 | |
| 10 | 58.4 | 58.1 | 58.6 | 57.8 | 58.0 | 56.6 | 61.1 | 55.7 | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 62.9 | 60.1 | 62.8 | 60.0 | 62.5 | 59.8 | 63.2 | 59.7 |
| 1 | 62.7 | 59.5 | 62.8 | 60.0 | 62.7 | 59.5 | 62.9 | 59.9 | |
| 3 | 62.2 | 59.6 | 62.9 | 59.5 | 62.0 | 59.2 | 62.3 | 59.0 | |
| 5 | 62.1 | 58.7 | 62.2 | 59.0 | 61.6 | 58.9 | 62.2 | 58.5 | |
| 10 | 61.2 | 58.6 | 61.7 | 58.7 | 61.2 | 58.5 | 62.4 | 57.9 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 62.6 | 59.7 | 62.8 | 59.9 | 62.4 | 59.9 | 62.9 | 59.3 |
| 1 | 62.5 | 59.4 | 62.7 | 60.2 | 61.9 | 59.7 | 62.4 | 59.4 | |
| 3 | 61.6 | 59.6 | 61.9 | 59.6 | 61.4 | 59.6 | 62.2 | 59.0 | |
| 5 | 60.7 | 59.9 | 61.8 | 59.5 | 61.7 | 59.2 | 62.2 | 58.9 | |
| 10 | 60.4 | 59.6 | 61.3 | 58.8 | 61.8 | 59.1 | 62.0 | 58.2 | |
| R | - | 60.5 | 59.9 | 59.9 | 59.9 | 60.4 | 59.6 | 60.0 | 57.1 |
Figure 4Changes in the glass transition temperature (Tg) of selected samples as a function of aging time; (a) first heating and (b) second heating.
Figure 5DSC curves of selected samples; (a) first heating of un-aged samples, (b) second heating of un-aged samples, (c) first heating of samples aged for 2160 h, and (d) second heating of samples aged for 2160 h.
Results of the tensile test.
| Extract Content [wt%] | Aging Time [h] | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 720 | 1440 | 2160 | ||||||
| σM [MPa] | εB [%] | σM [MPa] | εB [%] | σM [MPa] | εB [%] | σM [MPa] | εB [%] | ||
| P | - | 62.2 ± 2.0 | 12.4 ± 0.6 | 66.4 ± 2.7 | 7.0 ± 2.2 | 59.6 ± 2.0 | 6.9 ± 1.2 | 45.5 ± 2.2 | 6.4 ± 0.7 |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 62.6 ± 1.4 | 11.3 ± 0.7 | 70.7 ± 1.6 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 66.5 ± 1.7 | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 64.2 ± 1.4 | 5.5 ± 1.0 |
| 1 | 61.0 ± 1.2 | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 71.6 ± 3.1 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 62.6 ± 3.3 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 57.4 ± 4.9 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | |
| 3 | 61.6 ± 1.2 | 10.5 ± 0.8 | 67.2 ± 2.9 | 6.6 ± 0.4 | 60.2 ± 3.0 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 56.7 ± 2.7 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | |
| 5 | 60.7 ± 0.9 | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 63.7 ± 2.9 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 56.8 ± 3.0 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 54.0 ± 2.0 | 5.1 ± 0.7 | |
| 10 | 54.1 ± 1.5 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | 56.3 ± 2.0 | 8.0 ± 1.7 | 49.9 ± 1.5 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 47.7 ± 1.3 | 7.5 ± 0.9 | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 61.5 ± 1.9 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | 69.3 ± 1.7 | 7.0 ± 1.1 | 64.3 ± 1.1 | 7.2 ± 1.9 | 61.3 ± 1.6 | 6.7 ± 1.3 |
| 1 | 59.4 ± 1.8 | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 62.5 ± 4.2 | 6.6 ± 1.0 | 60.7 ± 1.8 | 7.3 ± 1.5 | 61.5 ± 1.8 | 7.4 ± 1.2 | |
| 3 | 58.3 ± 1.1 | 6.9 ± 0.4 | 61.5 ± 2.2 | 7.3 ± 1.0 | 56.8 ± 0.6 | 7.5 ± 1.4 | 58.0 ± 1.0 | 6.3 ± 0.8 | |
| 5 | 52.6 ± 2.1 | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 52.2 ± 2.5 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 49.8 ± 2.1 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 50.0 ± 2.0 | 6.3 ± 0.9 | |
| 10 | 43.1 ± 2.2 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 41.1 ± 1.5 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 37.6 ± 2.3 | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 36.5 ± 1.5 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 59.9 ± 1.7 | 11.1 ± 0.7 | 69.1 ± 0.8 | 8.2 ± 1.0 | 63.1 ± 1.3 | 6.9 ± 1.4 | 59.3 ± 1.3 | 6.7 ± 1.1 |
| 1 | 60.6 ± 1.2 | 11.0 ± 0.7 | 66.3 ± 2.8 | 6.8 ± 0.8 | 60.3 ± 2.7 | 9.5 ± 2.2 | 57.3 ± 2.2 | 7.0 ± 1.2 | |
| 3 | 58.5 ± 1.5 | 9.9 ± 0.4 | 63.4 ± 2.8 | 7.4 ± 1.1 | 55.7 ± 2.6 | 9.3 ± 1.1 | 54.0 ± 2.9 | 13.3 ± 2.1 | |
| 5 | 57.4 ± 1.6 | 9.2 ± 0.3 | 60.0 ± 1.4 | 7.6 ± 1.2 | 56.7 ± 2.1 | 8.3 ± 2.7 | 53.6 ± 1.0 | 7.6 ± 1.0 | |
| 10 | 57.7 ± 1.6 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 58.0 ± 2.0 | 9.8 ± 2.6 | 52.0 ± 1.4 | 10.2 ± 1.5 | 49.5 ± 0.3 | 14.8 ± 1.7 | |
| R | - | 55.5 ± 2.1 | 9.1 ± 0.7 | 66.4 ± 2.1 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 66.8 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 61.8 ± 2.1 | 4.8 ± 0.4 |
Figure 6Changes in (a) tensile strength (σM) and (b) tensile strain (εB) of selected samples as a function of aging time.
Results of impact tensile strength (atU) test.
| Extract Content [wt%] | atU [kJ/m2] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aging Time [h] | |||||
| 0 | 720 | 1440 | 2160 | ||
| P | - | 140.3 ± 3.4 | 150.3 ± 11.9 | 125.3 ± 14.9 | 112.4 ± 10.7 |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 140.5 ± 3.8 | 145.6 ± 11.9 | 136.3 ± 13.5 | 133.0 ± 10.9 |
| 1 | 140.4 ± 3.6 | 134.9 ± 8.4 | 138.4 ± 12.4 | 90.5 ± 4.1 | |
| 3 | 140.2 ± 3.6 | 147.6 ± 8.5 | 120.2 ± 5.6 | 121.0 ± 8.6 | |
| 5 | 141.0 ± 4.4 | 151.7 ± 10.7 | 103.7 ± 6.2 | 103.9 ± 11.5 | |
| 10 | 126.7 ± 4.3 | 143.5 ± 10.6 | 109.4 ± 9.9 | 109.0 ± 9.6 | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 139.9 ± 3.5 | 154.2 ± 9.8 | 135.0 ± 3.3 | 125.1 ± 10.7 |
| 1 | 140.8 ± 3.6 | 160.3 ± 9.2 | 119.7 ± 9.7 | 126.3 ± 6.6 | |
| 3 | 131.5 ± 3.3 | 139.7 ± 14.1 | 128.7 ± 11.3 | 123.6 ± 8.1 | |
| 5 | 118.4 ± 3.2 | 139.1 ± 9.0 | 117.3 ± 5.3 | 119.1 ± 13.1 | |
| 10 | 107.9 ± 3.4 | 148.2 ± 10.0 | 94.9 ± 2.6 | 94.7 ± 7.4 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 134.0 ± 3.4 | 145.9 ± 7.9 | 125.1 ± 9.7 | 133.8 ± 11.6 |
| 1 | 133.8 ± 3.6 | 163.9 ± 10.9 | 137.5 ± 18.6 | 121.3 ± 3.3 | |
| 3 | 134.9 ± 3.9 | 155.0 ± 6.7 | 145.7 ± 7.3 | 142.1 ± 11.7 | |
| 5 | 131.9 ± 4.2 | 168.5 ± 10.8 | 131.7 ± 11.4 | 132.4 ± 8.7 | |
| 10 | 130.5 ± 3.8 | 152.2 ± 4.7 | 130.6 ± 12.5 | 126.6 ± 6.9 | |
| R | - | 145.7 ± 3.9 | 157.8 ± 14.9 | 134.7 ± 7.2 | 118.4 ± 5.4 |
Figure 7Changes in the impact tensile strength (atU) of selected samples as a function of aging time.