| Literature DB >> 31569774 |
Krzysztof Moraczewski1, Rafał Malinowski2, Wanda Sikorska3, Tomasz Karasiewicz4, Magdalena Stepczyńska5, Bartłomiej Jagodziński6, Piotr Rytlewski7.
Abstract
The paper presents the effects of biodegradation of polylactide containing natural anti-aging compounds. Polymer containing 0.5; 5 and 10 wt % of coffee, cocoa or cinnamon extracts were subjected to industrial composting for 7, 14, 21 or 28 days. The effect of the composting process on polylactide properties was examined based on visual assessment, scanning electron microscopy, average molecular weight, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetry, and tensile strength. The impact of the tested extracts on the effects of the composting process was compared with the impact of a commercially available anti-aging compound. It was found that the tested extracts in most cases did not adversely affect the effects of the composting process compared to pure polylactide, often resulting in intensification of biodegradation processes. As a result of the composting process, changes in the macro- and microscopic appearance of the samples and a decrease in molecular weight, phase transition temperatures, thermal resistance, and thermal strength were observed on a scale close to or greater than the reference anti-aging compound.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradation; plant extracts; polylactide; polyphenols
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569774 PMCID: PMC6835566 DOI: 10.3390/polym11101582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Photographs of selected samples before the composting process and after 7 or 28 days of composting; P—pure PLA, R—reference sample, P0.5—samples containing 0.5 wt % of individual extract, P10—samples containing 10 wt % of individual extract.
Figure 2SEM images of selected samples before the composting process and after 7 or 28 days of composting; P—pure PLA, R—reference sample, P0.5—samples containing 0.5 wt % of individual extract, P10—samples containing 10 wt % of individual extract. The scale of all images is the same: x2.50k.
Molecular weight (Mw) of samples submitted to the composting process.
| Extract Content [wt %] | Δ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biodegradation Time [days] | |||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | |||
| P | - | 209 900 | 157 100 | 147 300 | 5 900 | 4 300 | 97.9 |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 166 900 | 120 200 | 97 000 | 19 700 | 6 300 | 96.2 |
| 5 | 120 200 | 88 900 | 76 800 | 9 900 | 6 200 | 94.9 | |
| 10 | 127 500 | 95 300 | 88 000 | 7 800 | 3 900 | 97.0 | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 192 000 | 149 200 | 112 200 | 8 600 | 5 000 | 97.4 |
| 5 | 175 000 | 152 400 | 104 600 | 17 300 | 9 100 | 94.8 | |
| 10 | 155 700 | 142 100 | 92 900 | 49 300 | 10 600 | 93.2 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 198 600 | 140 700 | 139 600 | 10 700 | 4 800 | 97.6 |
| 5 | 176 000 | 149 900 | 105 700 | 10 000 | 8 200 | 95.3 | |
| 10 | 179 500 | 157 000 | 109 400 | 16 100 | 7 300 | 96.0 | |
| R | - | 177 900 | 115 800 | 85 600 | 15 000 | 4 500 | 97.5 |
Figure 3Changes in Mw loss as a function of composting time for samples containing (a) coffee extract, (b) cocoa extract, (c) cinnamon extract.
Figure 4Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of selected samples before the composting process and after 28 days of composting; (a) first heating, (b) second heating.
Figure 5DSC curves of selected samples in the range of glass transition.
Figure 6Thermogravimetric (TG) curves of selected samples before and after 28 days of composting.
Temperature of 5% of mass loss (T5%) samples submitted to the composting process.
| Extract Content [wt %] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biodegradation Time [days] | ||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | ||
| P | - | 275.5 | 281.2 | 275.8 | 259.4 | 251.4 |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 257.8 | 258.1 | 261.1 | 243.4 | 210.1 |
| 5 | 242.1 | 244.0 | 247.4 | 235.1 | 233.1 | |
| 10 | 236.2 | 240.4 | 236.4 | 244.1 | 228.2 | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 259.8 | 303.1 | 264.8 | 272.2 | 250.4 |
| 5 | 269.0 | 282.8 | 276.6 | 280.4 | 262.7 | |
| 10 | 268.1 | 279.5 | 271.8 | 258.1 | 265.8 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 270.6 | 297.8 | 277.7 | 252.3 | 192.2 |
| 5 | 283.0 | 267.1 | 254.5 | 272.1 | 177.2 | |
| 10 | 277.6 | 279.9 | 275.1 | 289.6 | 219.6 | |
| R | - | 271.0 | 288.0 | 278.4 | 245.4 | 195.5 |
Tensile strength (σM) of samples submitted to the composting process.
| Extract Content [wt %] | σM [MPa] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biodegradation Time [days] | ||||||
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | ||
| P | - | 56.1 ± 1.3 | 59.9 ± 1.5 | 61.9 ± 4.4 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | - |
| Coffee extract | 0.5 | 53.9 ± 0.84 | 54.7 ± 0.4 | 58.0 ± 1.8 | 5.7 ± 0.4 | - |
| 5 | 52.0 ± 1.3 | 39.2 ± 1.0 | 39.0 ± 1.4 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | - | |
| 10 | 46.4 ± 0.3 | 38.0 ± 0.3 | 20.4 ± 3.7 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | - | |
| Cocoa extract | 0.5 | 54.6 ± 1.3 | 55.2 ± 3.7 | 53.8 ± 6.8 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 11.9 ± 2.3 |
| 5 | 46.8 ± 0.6 | 41.6 ± 3.0 | 35.9 ± 0.5 | 13.2 ± 1.8 | 13.4 ± 2.0 | |
| 10 | 37.1 ± 4.7 | 30.3 ± 1.9 | 27.2 ± 4.8 | 20.3 ± 3.1 | 17.0 ± 1.7 | |
| Cinnamon extract | 0.5 | 53.9 ± 1.0 | 55.4 ± 1.2 | 48.1 ± 1.4 | 27.1 ± 0.9 | - |
| 5 | 51.8 ± 0.1 | 44.8 ± 2.0 | 45.5 ± 3.0 | 43.2 ± 2.9 | - | |
| 10 | 50.9 ± 1.2 | 44.0 ± 2.5 | 37.3 ± 2.9 | 40.2 ± 2.6 | 37.2 ± 2.3 | |
| R | - | 49.6 ± 1.8 | 54.2 ± 3.5 | 56.4 ± 3.2 | - | - |