Literature DB >> 30957312

Achalasia diagnosed despite normal integrated relaxation pressure responds favorably to therapy.

Santosh Sanagapalli1,2, Sabine Roman3, Audrey Hastier3, Rupert W Leong4, Kalp Patel1, Amanda Raeburn1, Matthew Banks1, Rehan Haidry1, Laurence Lovat1, David Graham1, Sarmed S Sami1, Rami Sweis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Achalasia diagnosis requires elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP; manometric marker of lower esophageal sphincter [LES] relaxation). Yet, some patients exhibit clinical features of achalasia despite normal IRP and have LES dysfunction demonstrable by other means. We hypothesized these patients to exhibit equivalent therapeutic response compared to standard achalasia patients.
METHODS: Symptomatic achalasia-like cases, despite normal IRP, displayed evidence of impaired LES relaxation using rapid drink challenge (RDC), solid swallows during high-resolution manometry, and/or barium esophagogram; were treated with achalasia therapies and compared to standard achalasia patients with raised IRP. Outcomes included equivalence for short- and long-term symptom response and stasis on barium esophagogram. KEY
RESULTS: Twenty-nine normal IRP achalasia cases (14 males, median age 50 year, median Eckardt 6, barium stasis 12 ± 7 cm) and 29 consecutive standard achalasia controls underwent therapy. Among cases, LES dysfunction was most often identified by RDC and/or barium esophagogram. Short-term symptomatic success was equivalent in cases vs controls (90% vs 93%; 95% CI for difference: -19% to 13%). Median short-term (1 vs 1; 95% CI for difference: 0-1) and long-term Eckardt scores (2 vs 1; 95% CI for difference: 0-2) were similar in cases and controls, respectively. Adequate clearance was observed in 67% of cases vs 81% of controls on post-therapy esophagogram. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: We described a subset of achalasia patients with normal IRP, but impaired LES relaxation identifiable only on additional provocative tests. These patients benefited from treatment, suggesting that such tests should be performed to increase the number of clinically relevant diagnoses.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; high resolution manometry; timed barium swallow

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30957312     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  8 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Role of Rapid Drink Challenge During Esophageal High-resolution Manometry in Predicting Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Achalasia.

Authors:  Hélène Foisy; Mathieu Pioche; Edouard Chabrun; Thierry Ponchon; Frank Zerbib; Jérôme Rivory; François Mion; Sabine Roman
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

3.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  Nigel J Trudgill; Daniel Sifrim; Rami Sweis; Mark Fullard; Kumar Basu; Mimi McCord; Michael Booth; John Hayman; Guy Boeckxstaens; Brian T Johnston; Nicola Ager; John De Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Advances and caveats in modern achalasia management.

Authors:  Marcella Pesce; Rami Sweis
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Leonardo M Del Grande; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Rami Sweis; Rena Yadlapati; John Pandolfino; Albis Hani; Claudia Defilippi; Tack Jan; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  High-Resolution Manometry-Observations After 15 Years of Personal Use-Has Advancement Reached a Plateau?

Authors:  Rami Sweis; Mark Fox
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-08-07

8.  Combination of Symptom Profile, Endoscopic Findings, and Esophageal Mucosal Histopathology Helps to Differentiate Achalasia from Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Chia-Chu Yeh; Chia-Tung Shun; Liang-Wei Tseng; Tsung-Hsien Chiang; Jia-Feng Wu; Hui-Chuan Lee; Chien-Chuan Chen; Hsiu-Po Wang; Ming-Shiang Wu; Ping-Huei Tseng
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.