Literature DB >> 30956463

VBAC: Changes over Last 10 Years.

Neha Gupta1, Arpita De1, Swaraj Batra1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) has been historically studied to be a standard and a safe procedure with good successful results. AIMS: This study was conducted to determine changes in pattern of VBAC by the same author over a period of 10 years.
RESULTS: Data for 1 year between 2005-2006 and 2014-2015 were compared, and successful VBAC was found to be 74.46% in 2005-2006 period compared to only 34.42% in 2014-2015. Neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity were, however, much higher 10 years ago.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that better diagnostic techniques, awareness of patients and medico legal fear have led to safer health of mother and child and lesser incidence of VBAC over the last 10 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean; Failed; Previous; Trends; Trial; VBAC

Year:  2018        PMID: 30956463      PMCID: PMC6430443          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-018-1101-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  16 in total

Review 1.  Birth route in case of cesarean section in a previous pregnancy.

Authors:  Ricardo Simões; Wanderley M Bernardo; Antônio J Salomão; Edmund C Baracat
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.209

2.  Caesarean delivery: An experience from a tertiary institution in north western Nigeria.

Authors:  C N Daniel; S Singh
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one cesarean section.

Authors:  Lekshmi Balachandran; Pooja R Vaswani; Ramakone Mogotlane
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

4.  Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Salma Imran Kayani; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Cesarean deliveries among Nepalese mothers: changes over time 2001-2011 and determinants.

Authors:  K C Prakash; Subas Neupane
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success.

Authors:  H E Knight; I Gurol-Urganci; J H van der Meulen; T A Mahmood; D H Richmond; A Dougall; D A Cromwell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.

Authors:  F Gary Cunningham; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Sarah S Brown; Thomas Michael Dean; Marilynn Frederiksen; Carol J Rowland Hogue; Tekoa King; Emily Spencer Lukacz; Laurence B McCullough; Wanda Nicholson; Nancy Frances Petit; Jeffrey Lynn Probstfield; Adele C Viguera; Cynthia A Wong; Sheila Cohen Zimmet
Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements       Date:  2010-03-10

8.  Trends of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Germany from 1990 to 2012: a population-based study.

Authors:  I Kyvernitakis; J Reichelt; A Kyvernitakis; B Misselwitz; P Hadji; S Schmidt; M Kalder
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 0.685

Review 9.  Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Vidyadhar B Bangal; Purushottam A Giri; Kunaal K Shinde; Satyajit P Gavhane
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety and feasibility of trial of vaginal labor after cesarean section: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Mingwei Zhang; Qin Su; Yan Cao; Minmin Zhao; Di Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.