Literature DB >> 24251861

Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success.

H E Knight1, I Gurol-Urganci, J H van der Meulen, T A Mahmood, D H Richmond, A Dougall, D A Cromwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the demographic and obstetric factors associated with the uptake and success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC).
DESIGN: Cohort study using data from Hospital Episode Statistics.
SETTING: English National Health Service. POPULATION: Women whose first birth resulted in a live singleton delivery by caesarean section between 1 April 2004 and 31 March 2011, and who had a second birth before 31 March 2012.
METHODS: Logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attempted and successful VBAC.
RESULTS: Among the 143,970 women in the cohort, 75,086 (52.2%) attempted a VBAC for their second birth. Younger women, those of non-white ethnicity and those living in a more deprived area had higher rates of attempted VBAC. Overall, 47,602 women (63.4%) who attempted a VBAC had a successful vaginal birth. Younger women and women of white ethnicity had higher success rates. Black women had a particularly low success rate (OR, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.57). Women who had an emergency caesarean section in their first birth also had a lower VBAC success rate, particularly those with a history of failed induction of labour (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.67).
CONCLUSION: In this national cohort, just over one-half of women with a primary caesarean section who were eligible for a trial of labour attempted a VBAC for their second birth. Of these, almost two-thirds successfully achieved a vaginal delivery.
© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative data; England; trial of labour; vaginal birth after caesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24251861     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  29 in total

1.  Trial of labor after cesarean in the low-risk obstetric population: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  S Stattmiller; M Lavecchia; N Czuzoj-Shulman; A R Spence; H A Abenhaim
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity.

Authors:  Joyce K Edmonds; Summer Sherburne Hawkins; Bruce B Cohen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-06

3.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald E Iverson; Lois McCloskey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  VBAC: Changes over Last 10 Years.

Authors:  Neha Gupta; Arpita De; Swaraj Batra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-03-13

5.  Predicting Successful Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems.

Authors:  Mayur Dilipbhai Patel; Nandita Maitra; Purvi K Patel; Tosha Sheth; Palak Vaishnav
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-07-07

6.  After surgery: the effects of life-saving caesarean sections in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Véronique Filippi; Rasmané Ganaba; Clara Calvert; Susan F Murray; Katerini T Storeng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Nationwide population-based cohort study of uterine rupture in Belgium: results from the Belgian Obstetric Surveillance System.

Authors:  G Vandenberghe; M De Blaere; V Van Leeuw; K Roelens; Y Englert; M Hanssens; H Verstraelen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Planned Repeat Cesarean Section at Term and Adverse Childhood Health Outcomes: A Record-Linkage Study.

Authors:  Mairead Black; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Sam Philip; Jane E Norman; David J McLernon
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 9.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices.

Authors:  Mairead Black; Vikki A Entwistle; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shu-Wen Chen; Alison M Hutchinson; Cate Nagle; Tracey K Bucknall
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.