Literature DB >> 3094946

The new contrast agents: a perspective.

M A Bettmann.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3094946     DOI: 10.1007/bf02577934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: randomized double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  P H Nakstad; S J Bakke; O Kjartansson; J von Krogh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Lumbar myelography with iohexol and metrizamide: a comparative multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  S A Kieffer; E F Binet; D O Davis; T O Gabrielsen; D K Kido; R E Latchaw; P A Turski; D D Shaw
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Direct myocardial effects of intracoronary administration of new contrast materials with lost osmolality.

Authors:  C B Higgins; M Sovak; W S Schmidt; M J Kelley; J D Newell
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  D N Salem; M A Konstam; J M Isner; J D Bonin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Experience with metrizamide in patients with previous severe anaphylactoid reactions to ionic contrast agents.

Authors:  S Rapoport; J J Bookstein; C B Higgins; P H Carey; M Sovak; E C Lasser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Iohexol in patients with previous adverse reactions to contrast media.

Authors:  S Holtås
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  M A Bettmann; C B Higgins
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Iohexol vs. iopamidol for myelography.

Authors:  J T Lamb
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Effects of a new nonionic and a conventional ionic contrast agent on coronary sinus ionized calcium and left ventricular hemodynamics in dogs.

Authors:  P D Bourdillon; M A Bettmann; S McCracken; P A Poole-Wilson; W Grossman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Absence of myocardial biochemical toxicity with a nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol).

Authors:  J A Wisneski; E W Gertz; R A Neese; D L Morris
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  2 in total

1.  Unsuccessful pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade during angiocardiography with nonionic contrast material.

Authors:  J Calabuig; S Mejía; J Cabanero; S Crisóstomo; C Navarro; D Martínez Caro
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Safety of the nonionic contrast medium omnipaque in coronary angiography.

Authors:  K Levorstad; K Vatne; U Brodahl; B Laake; S Simonsen; T Aakhus
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.740

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.